Author

Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 130. (Read 2591920 times)

legendary
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027

I use IFTTT (If This Then That) to notify of new payouts.

I shared the recipe if anyone wants to use it: https://ifttt.com/recipes/338858-if-bitcoin-received-at-address-then-send-me-a-text-message

Basically it monitors the chain.com API for any incoming tx's to your mining address and sends you a SMS text message when coins are received...

This is cool - is there a charge for the sms?

Not from IFTTT, but perhaps from your carrier. If you pay to receive regular txt messages then I imagine there would be the same fee. I have unlimited texting included with my cell plan so no charge for me.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250

I use IFTTT (If This Then That) to notify of new payouts.

I shared the recipe if anyone wants to use it: https://ifttt.com/recipes/338858-if-bitcoin-received-at-address-then-send-me-a-text-message

Basically it monitors the chain.com API for any incoming tx's to your mining address and sends you a SMS text message when coins are received...

This is cool - is there a charge for the sms?
legendary
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
BTW if someone wants to receive instant WhatsApp notifications about new blocks - please send you phone number in P.M.

https://i.imgur.com/qO3l6dB.png

http://forum.bits.media/uploads/monthly_11_2015/post-25987-0-68142200-1446512918.jpg

For present moment I can add new phone numbers myself only, still no subscription interface to this service (TBD).
To unsubscribe you may also send me another message or just block incoming number in your WhatsApp application.

One feature - you will get 24x7 notifications immediately as block found. Still no scheduled messages delivery.  So this may disturb your sleep Smiley

I use IFTTT (If This Then That) to notify of new payouts.

I shared the recipe if anyone wants to use it: https://ifttt.com/recipes/338858-if-bitcoin-received-at-address-then-send-me-a-text-message

Basically it monitors the chain.com API for any incoming tx's to your mining address and sends you a SMS text message when coins are received...
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Whew, that was getting ugly.....  Grin

Yeah - let's hope it's a while before we get one of those again. Good to see that the hash rate & miners kept at it though without bailing when luck sucks  Smiley
full member
Activity: 157
Merit: 103
Whew, that was getting ugly.....  Grin
Still nodody posted here?  But we've got block some hours ago. Congratulations Smiley
https://blockchain.info/block/0000000000000000118a4186eb63e9eb750b87bac04d2b905e3b188c343cdf97
legendary
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
Whew, that was getting ugly.....  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1024
Mine at Jonny's Pool
so i am mining with high hashrate for 5 days now.. but obviously all my hashpower is being destroyed by "bad luck"..
we are at 16% luck now..
( luck has nothing to do with other pools by the way, just with the difficulty.. orphaned blocks would indicate too much pool-competition )

16% is really bad.. so i am always frightened that something is wrong and we are not noticing it..
and my biggest fear is that i made it broken..

i am merge mining some forgotten coins nobody else is mining ( obviously - i own 90% of the network hash power there, diff quite low. )
so everytime i find a share, i also find 2-4 blocks simultaneously ( each on a different network )

so please tell me that this is no problem for p2pool and i did not break the network.
( it might be confused that one share = 4 blocks on different networks? could that lead to a broken sharechain in p2pool? )

and no i will not tell in public you which networks i use..
( they bring me a 2% bonus on my income.. or with 0% luck... i only loose 98% instead of 100%..  )

concering the merge "bonus": every node operator should definitely set the fee to zero and use the merged coins as his income.. so everybody wins.. ( a negative fee would also be interesting.. but would be quite complicated, as you would have to integrate transactions ("old coins") in the new block )
First, I like your optimism... "I only lose 98% instead of 100%".  Smiley

Second, no, you didn't break the network.  I have, in the past, merge mined every coin that could be.  there were plenty of times that I would find blocks of multiple coins with a single share.  Think about it like this: every time you find a block of BTC, you have by default also found a block of every coin you are merge mining.

so i am mining with high hashrate for 5 days now.. but obviously all my hashpower is being destroyed by "bad luck"..
we are at 16% luck now..
( luck has nothing to do with other pools by the way, just with the difficulty.. orphaned blocks would indicate too much pool-competition )

16% is really bad.. so i am always frightened that something is wrong and we are not noticing it..
and my biggest fear is that i made it broken..

That's been my paranoia for a few days...


7 day luck is 0%.  30 day luck is 78.77%.  In any case, our current round is painfully long, but certainly not out of the realm of statistical possibility.  Let's assume we've had 1.5PH/s average every day.  With that hash rate, we'd expect to find a block every 2.06 days.  It's almost 10 days.  If we round things off a bit, we can see this is a 500% block.  Painful... but they happen.

In other words, there is nothing wrong here.
member
Activity: 193
Merit: 10
so i am mining with high hashrate for 5 days now.. but obviously all my hashpower is being destroyed by "bad luck"..
we are at 16% luck now..
( luck has nothing to do with other pools by the way, just with the difficulty.. orphaned blocks would indicate too much pool-competition )

16% is really bad.. so i am always frightened that something is wrong and we are not noticing it..
and my biggest fear is that i made it broken..

That's been my paranoia for a few days...
sr. member
Activity: 373
Merit: 250
so i am mining with high hashrate for 5 days now.. but obviously all my hashpower is being destroyed by "bad luck"..
we are at 16% luck now..
( luck has nothing to do with other pools by the way, just with the difficulty.. orphaned blocks would indicate too much pool-competition )

16% is really bad.. so i am always frightened that something is wrong and we are not noticing it..
and my biggest fear is that i made it broken..

i am merge mining some forgotten coins nobody else is mining ( obviously - i own 90% of the network hash power there, diff quite low. )
so everytime i find a share, i also find 2-4 blocks simultaneously ( each on a different network )

so please tell me that this is no problem for p2pool and i did not break the network.
( it might be confused that one share = 4 blocks on different networks? could that lead to a broken sharechain in p2pool? )

and no i will not tell in public you which networks i use..
( they bring me a 2% bonus on my income.. or with 0% luck... i only loose 98% instead of 100%..  )

concering the merge "bonus": every node operator should definitely set the fee to zero and use the merged coins as his income.. so everybody wins.. ( a negative fee would also be interesting.. but would be quite complicated, as you would have to integrate transactions ("old coins") in the new block )
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
hi,

to promote the use of p2pool, it would be possible to make it also "shared" the merged mining?

and permit those who connect to a node add own address? For example add own address nmc instead of the password..

Thank you for reply and sorry for my english.. Wink

Personaly I do not think it is possible. It would be possible only under condition if each node was merge mining and they are not and they will not. I find it great to may merge mine but the principles of decentralised mining of bitcoin goes counter your idea. imho
legendary
Activity: 1257
Merit: 1004
pool.sexy
hi,

to promote the use of p2pool, it would be possible to make it also "shared" the merged mining?

and permit those who connect to a node add own address? For example add own address nmc instead of the password..

Thank you for reply and sorry for my english.. Wink
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 2258
I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)
Is this due to lack of hashpower in the pool vs others (ie: everyone else is beating us to it) or simply really really bad luck..
Simpler than that: Someone just pissed off one of the Elder Gods.

sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
was exactly 3 months ago
Sorry for creating confusion with my slightly unclear post at forum.namecoin.info. Actually it was 3 months ago when the miners had the last chance to mine a NMC block using one of the old Namecoin clients. However, there was a p2pool-mined NMC block six weeks ago, and another one five weeks ago. Both using the new Namecoin Core client.

2015-08-02 23:21 UTC, NMC block 242312, mined by ghash.io. This was the last time an old NMC client was able to sucessfully mine a non-orphaned block.
2015-10-13 21:17 UTC, NMC block 253122, mined by p2pool miner 1GqdAgC1zmzLFMg3XyYctSECWUjkbT7Nv9 using the new Namecoin Core client
2015-10-19 05:10 UTC, NMC block 253874, mined by p2pool miner 14N4xNSDtNYatfCgHhyRaAhdZtaczUBnAa using the new Namecoin Core client

Ah! - that's more like it. Thanks for those stats & putting my concerns at rest cassini - phew!  Smiley


Is this due to lack of hashpower in the pool vs others (ie: everyone else is beating us to it) or simply really really bad luck..


I'd say it's a combination of all of those. Long blocks happen on all pools though, large & small, luck is luck  Wink
member
Activity: 193
Merit: 10
Looks like it was 8 and even 12 days before http://p2pool.info/

Do NOT use p2pool.info - it hasn't worked properly for at least 7 months.

Use   http://minefast.coincadence.com/p2pool-stats.php

WOW! Really 9 days without a block !

Is this due to lack of hashpower in the pool vs others (ie: everyone else is beating us to it) or simply really really bad luck..
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
was exactly 3 months ago
Sorry for creating confusion with my slightly unclear post at forum.namecoin.info. Actually it was 3 months ago when the miners had the last chance to mine a NMC block using one of the old Namecoin clients. However, there was a p2pool-mined NMC block six weeks ago, and another one five weeks ago. Both using the new Namecoin Core client.

2015-08-02 23:21 UTC, NMC block 242312, mined by ghash.io. This was the last time an old NMC client was able to sucessfully mine a non-orphaned block.
2015-10-13 21:17 UTC, NMC block 253122, mined by p2pool miner 1GqdAgC1zmzLFMg3XyYctSECWUjkbT7Nv9 using the new Namecoin Core client
2015-10-19 05:10 UTC, NMC block 253874, mined by p2pool miner 14N4xNSDtNYatfCgHhyRaAhdZtaczUBnAa using the new Namecoin Core client
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Or even more accurately "Does anyone have a best share higher than the current NMC difficulty AND that share did not mine a block?"

I would say probably, yes. But without seeing everyones log it's hard to say. I'm pretty sure that in the months that p2pool users have been using the namecoin-core client for merge mining with p2pool - somebody would have found a valid share & been paid for it......I'd love to hear from that person  Wink

Update on this - I just got the stats through from cassini on the NMC thread - the last NMC block mined by p2pool was exactly 3 months ago, which pretty much matches up with what I thought:

https://forum.namecoin.info/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2371&p=15993#p15993

I think we need to look a little deeper into the namecoin-core code to try & find the cause - only I don't have a clue where to start  Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Looks like it was 8 and even 12 days before http://p2pool.info/

Do NOT use p2pool.info - it hasn't worked properly for at least 7 months.

Use   http://minefast.coincadence.com/p2pool-stats.php
full member
Activity: 157
Merit: 103
Looks like it was 8 and even 12 days before http://p2pool.info/
member
Activity: 193
Merit: 10
Has it really been over 5 days since the last block was found ?
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Or even more accurately "Does anyone have a best share higher than the current NMC difficulty AND that share did not mine a block?"

I would say probably, yes. But without seeing everyones log it's hard to say. I'm pretty sure that in the months that p2pool users have been using the namecoin-core client for merge mining with p2pool - somebody would have found a valid share & been paid for it......I'd love to hear from that person  Wink
Jump to: