Author

Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 242. (Read 2592023 times)

legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
Quote from: idonothave
what You have is more then good, no need to make any change, imho

 Cool

Quote from: windpath
Ping from NYC (US east) ~60ms

You can ping yourself from various places here: http://www.pingtest.net/

Thanks for the link. Weird that you're getting 60ms, pinging Brooklyn gets me 25ms.

Added a second dashboard just now, will have to figure out which is best to use and how to customize it to my liking.

http://69.157.250.149:9332/static/p2pool-node-status/
legendary
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
Thanks for the info, guys.

Quote from: windpath
To open it up to the public make sure ports 9332 and 9333 are open to the public and map to your p2pool server on your LAN...

Should 8333 be opened also to provide better node connectivity? I currently have 8333 and 9333 open.

Any security precautions to take into consideration?

Edit: Opened up 9332, and allowed responding to pings.

http://69.157.250.149:9332/static/

Would you fellas mind pinging my server and posting your results? Specifying your general location would be appreciated, too. The server is located in Montreal, Canada.

Ping from NYC (US east) ~60ms

You can ping yourself from various places here: http://www.pingtest.net/
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Thanks for the info, guys.

Quote from: windpath
To open it up to the public make sure ports 9332 and 9333 are open to the public and map to your p2pool server on your LAN...

Should 8333 be opened also to provide better node connectivity? I currently have 8333 and 9333 open.

Any security precautions to take into consideration?

Edit: Opened up 9332, and allowed responding to pings.

http://69.157.250.149:9332/static/

Would you fellas mind pinging my server and posting your results? Specifying your general location would be appreciated, too. The server is located in Montreal, Canada.

what You have is more then good, no need to make any change, imho
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
Thanks for the info, guys.

Quote from: windpath
To open it up to the public make sure ports 9332 and 9333 are open to the public and map to your p2pool server on your LAN...

Should 8333 be opened also to provide better node connectivity? I currently have 8333 and 9333 open.

Any security precautions to take into consideration?

Edit: Opened up 9332, and allowed responding to pings.

http://69.157.250.149:9332/static/

Would you fellas mind pinging my server and posting your results? Specifying your general location would be appreciated, too. The server is located in Montreal, Canada.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
There is a minimum amount of hash power to expect a share in each block found, as the pool rate increases so does that minimum power requirement.

Right now I'd estimate around 500 GH/s as a safe minimum based on current active miners with payouts.

If you go to the global stats page, click on the active miners tab and sort by estimated hashrate you can get an idea of the minimum.

http://minefast.coincadence.com/p2pool-stats.php

I couldn't imagine mining on p2pool with 500 GH/s.  The variance would be horrid.

I've got about 5.7 TH/s on here, and my expected time to share is 2.5 hours.  Working backwards, that's about one share every 28.5 hours on average with 500 GH/s.

M

Agreed, it would be like a long visit to the dentist waiting for those shares, but you would expect to find one share for each block, here is an example of a miner estimated at ~500GH/s:

http://minefast.coincadence.com/miner.php?id=1LavTqNGUSwS4qHWK1d8ZRNQjCxU3bouYQ

To each their own!!

M
legendary
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
There is a minimum amount of hash power to expect a share in each block found, as the pool rate increases so does that minimum power requirement.

Right now I'd estimate around 500 GH/s as a safe minimum based on current active miners with payouts.

If you go to the global stats page, click on the active miners tab and sort by estimated hashrate you can get an idea of the minimum.

http://minefast.coincadence.com/p2pool-stats.php

I couldn't imagine mining on p2pool with 500 GH/s.  The variance would be horrid.

I've got about 5.7 TH/s on here, and my expected time to share is 2.5 hours.  Working backwards, that's about one share every 28.5 hours on average with 500 GH/s.

M

Agreed, it would be like a long visit to the dentist waiting for those shares, but you would expect to find one share for each block, here is an example of a miner estimated at ~500GH/s:

http://minefast.coincadence.com/miner.php?id=1LavTqNGUSwS4qHWK1d8ZRNQjCxU3bouYQ

legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
There is a minimum amount of hash power to expect a share in each block found, as the pool rate increases so does that minimum power requirement.

Right now I'd estimate around 500 GH/s as a safe minimum based on current active miners with payouts.

If you go to the global stats page, click on the active miners tab and sort by estimated hashrate you can get an idea of the minimum.

http://minefast.coincadence.com/p2pool-stats.php

I couldn't imagine mining on p2pool with 500 GH/s.  The variance would be horrid.

I've got about 5.7 TH/s on here, and my expected time to share is 2.5 hours.  Working backwards, that's about one share every 28.5 hours on average with 500 GH/s.

M
legendary
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
Thanks for the chart. Sucks that they left p2pool, I wonder they did. Gotta figure out a way to get more power on the pool!

more reliable nodes ? spread the word, more support for each other & developments for p2pool

i have 2 myself & helped a buddy to make 1 on his own.

I have been thinking about making my private node public to help out a bit, but I have no idea where to start with that. Are there any guides? Here's what it looks like locally, I've been meaning to ask whether it is performing as well as it should be:

...

I'd appreciate any feedback on the node's performance. It's running on high end hardware, SSD, and is connect to the internet VIA a 175/175Mbps fiber optic connection.

Performance looks great, would not mess with it.

To open it up to the public make sure ports 9332 and 9333 are open to the public and map to your p2pool server on your LAN...

The current design of p2pool has a fatal flaw.

The more hashpower it has, the higher the share difficulty gets, which knocks out "smaller" miners.
The less it has, the easier it is for smaller miners, but the longer it is from blocks.

Can't have your blocks and miners too.

M

That could be aided by big miners setting higher difficulty shares right?


There is a minimum amount of hash power to expect a share in each block found, as the pool rate increases so does that minimum power requirement.

Right now I'd estimate around 500 GH/s as a safe minimum based on current active miners with payouts.

If you go to the global stats page, click on the active miners tab and sort by estimated hashrate you can get an idea of the minimum.

http://minefast.coincadence.com/p2pool-stats.php

legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
I'd appreciate any feedback on the node's performance. It's running on high end hardware, SSD, and is connect to the internet VIA a 175/175Mbps fiber optic connection.

That looks good to me.

Quote
Quote
The current design of p2pool has a fatal flaw.

The more hashpower it has, the higher the share difficulty gets, which knocks out "smaller" miners.
The less it has, the easier it is for smaller miners, but the longer it is from blocks.

Can't have your blocks and miners too.

M

That could be aided by big miners setting higher difficulty shares right?

It can help with very large miners, yes.  Doesn't seem like there are any right now.

M
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
Thanks for the chart. Sucks that they left p2pool, I wonder they did. Gotta figure out a way to get more power on the pool!

more reliable nodes ? spread the word, more support for each other & developments for p2pool

i have 2 myself & helped a buddy to make 1 on his own.

I have been thinking about making my private node public to help out a bit, but I have no idea where to start with that. Are there any guides? Here's what it looks like locally, I've been meaning to ask whether it is performing as well as it should be:





I'd appreciate any feedback on the node's performance. It's running on high end hardware, SSD, and is connect to the internet VIA a 175/175Mbps fiber optic connection.

Thanks for the chart. Sucks that they left p2pool, I wonder they did. Gotta figure out a way to get more power on the pool!

more reliable nodes ? spread the word, more support for each other & developments for p2pool

i have 2 myself & helped a buddy to make 1 on his own.

The current design of p2pool has a fatal flaw.

The more hashpower it has, the higher the share difficulty gets, which knocks out "smaller" miners.
The less it has, the easier it is for smaller miners, but the longer it is from blocks.

Can't have your blocks and miners too.

M

That could be aided by big miners setting higher difficulty shares right?
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Thanks for the chart. Sucks that they left p2pool, I wonder they did. Gotta figure out a way to get more power on the pool!

more reliable nodes ? spread the word, more support for each other & developments for p2pool

i have 2 myself & helped a buddy to make 1 on his own.

The current design of p2pool has a fatal flaw.

The more hashpower it has, the higher the share difficulty gets, which knocks out "smaller" miners.
The less it has, the easier it is for smaller miners, but the longer it is from blocks.

Can't have your blocks and miners too.

M
legendary
Activity: 1500
Merit: 1002
Mine Mine Mine
Thanks for the chart. Sucks that they left p2pool, I wonder they did. Gotta figure out a way to get more power on the pool!

more reliable nodes ? spread the word, more support for each other & developments for p2pool

i have 2 myself & helped a buddy to make 1 on his own.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
Thanks for the chart. Sucks that they left p2pool, I wonder they did. Gotta figure out a way to get more power on the pool!
legendary
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
Did p2pool lose it's biggest miner? The top payout address used to be about 5BTC per block. Too bad if so.

I updated the global stats page to include a 6 month resolution for hashrate/miners/DOA, next update when we have 9 months of data.

http://minefast.coincadence.com/p2pool-stats.php



During the gap in September my server was down, the pool was fine...

Without an in depth analysis of the data we store I can not be sure, but it looks like we lost a big miner, and picked up a bunch of smaller ones....
sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
Are we there yet?
Wow. Nice quick round Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
Did p2pool lose it's biggest miner? The top payout address used to be about 5BTC per block. Too bad if so.
sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
Are we there yet?
Ok,

Looks like my node is running stable, so if there is anyone here from Singapore or near Singapore and are not running your own node, feel free to use mine.

sepulcher.wha.la:9332 with 200Mpbs Up/Down Fibre Broadband.

0% Fees with mean getblock latency at 0.2s

Thank you.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
That screen is localhost - not http://192.168.0.4:9332  Huh

lol, yes, maybe he runs it on another machine...
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
WANTED: Active dev to fix & re-write p2pool in C
That screen is localhost - not http://192.168.0.4:9332  Huh
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Jump to: