Author

Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 559. (Read 2591920 times)

-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
So I tried the current version of p2pool on a single 5.7GHz Jalapeño with cgminer connecting via stratum. This works out to about 80 diff1 shares per minute. It "works" in a sense of the word, without causing any weird errors or duplicating work that happen with the Avalon but there are huge lags between share submission and responses from p2pool after a while. Watching the CPU usage, I see a spike to 100% of one core whenever a block of transactions comes in and that coincides with the lag to respond to share submission, leading to more stale rejects if that occurs at the wrong time. The CPU in question is a 12 thread 3.4GHz CPU so it is clearly not underpowered. I suspect what happens on the Avalon is simply a grossly exaggerated form of this leading to misbehaviour.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1014
It's a real Litecoin-P2Pool block, but the Litecoin explorer is displaying Litecoin addresses as Bitcoin addresses for some reason. It appears to have been orphaned, so you didn't get a payout. The explorer displaying Bitcoin addresses and the block being orphaned might have some common cause, however..
That makes sense, thank you for the answers.
hero member
Activity: 516
Merit: 643
2nd time this happens, a block mined by p2pool (LTC), and the reward is shared between the set of addresses all starting from "1" (like BTC addresses), how's it possible? Block #343029, found today at 13:48 UTC: http://explorer.litecoin.net/block/fcfb92180fb433cfd9d5f1bc5b587995232d72e6b5370d343265a8bbbb5ccd96


That's a bug in the block explorer you're using. There is no way for a Litecoin transaction to pay Bitcoin addreses - the network ID isn't even encoded in the block. All addresses in a block are just 160-bit hashes, without any identifying information.
You mean, it's a bug of explorer.litecoin.net? If so, then why is that block listed in the p2pool history? And why haven't I got any reward from it?

It's a real Litecoin-P2Pool block, but the Litecoin explorer is displaying Litecoin addresses as Bitcoin addresses for some reason. It appears to have been orphaned, so you didn't get a payout. The explorer displaying Bitcoin addresses and the block being orphaned might have some common cause, however..
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1014
2nd time this happens, a block mined by p2pool (LTC), and the reward is shared between the set of addresses all starting from "1" (like BTC addresses), how's it possible? Block #343029, found today at 13:48 UTC: http://explorer.litecoin.net/block/fcfb92180fb433cfd9d5f1bc5b587995232d72e6b5370d343265a8bbbb5ccd96


That's a bug in the block explorer you're using. There is no way for a Litecoin transaction to pay Bitcoin addreses - the network ID isn't even encoded in the block. All addresses in a block are just 160-bit hashes, without any identifying information.
You mean, it's a bug of explorer.litecoin.net? If so, then why is that block listed in the p2pool history? And why haven't I got any reward for it?
hero member
Activity: 516
Merit: 643
2nd time this happens, a block mined by p2pool (LTC), and the reward is shared between the set of addresses all starting from "1" (like BTC addresses), how's it possible? Block #343029, found today at 13:48 UTC: http://explorer.litecoin.net/block/fcfb92180fb433cfd9d5f1bc5b587995232d72e6b5370d343265a8bbbb5ccd96


That's a bug in the block explorer you're using. There is no way for a Litecoin transaction to pay Bitcoin addreses - the network ID isn't even encoded in the block. All addresses in a block are just 160-bit hashes, without any identifying information.
full member
Activity: 122
Merit: 100
Also, is there any way to filter out all the "Worker user submitted...", "Hash", and "Target" lines in the output? It just seems like spam, and the other messages are actually useful.
full member
Activity: 122
Merit: 100
(LTC)
How long should I let it keep saying "Shares: 0" before I get concerned something is wrong?

Restarted p2pool and cgminer, and it was at 0 for ~8 hours yesterday, then miner crashed for some reason, and when I started it back up I got a share. Of course it's been 12 hours now and all payouts have been less than half what they were before it. Host downtime seems very punishing with p2pool.
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
it's litecoin the same to bitcoin, to configure?
and what about the adress, is also the same?
The same steps. But don't forget to add a copy of litecoin.conf in a data folder if it's not default one. Had big problems with that.
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
2nd time this happens, a block mined by p2pool (LTC), and the reward is shared between the set of addresses all starting from "1" (like BTC addresses), how's it possible? Block #343029, found today at 13:48 UTC: http://explorer.litecoin.net/block/fcfb92180fb433cfd9d5f1bc5b587995232d72e6b5370d343265a8bbbb5ccd96


Maybe someone configured a LTC P2Pool and connected it to a local Bitcoin node instead of a Litecoin node ? I'm a bit surprised it make it through P2Pool and a Litecoin node to be published on the P2P network though.

It was orphaned (maybe only some Litecoin nodes accept this kind of block and there's one of such active on LTC P2Pool).
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1014
2nd time this happens, a block mined by p2pool (LTC), and the reward is shared between the set of addresses all starting from "1" (like BTC addresses), how's it possible? Block #343029, found today at 13:48 UTC: http://explorer.litecoin.net/block/fcfb92180fb433cfd9d5f1bc5b587995232d72e6b5370d343265a8bbbb5ccd96
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Huh?
"Authorization required".
Something wrong with login/password.
I got such messages when I tried to do merge mining with NMC. That time I didn't put rpcuser/password in bitcoin.cong file in Namecoin folder.

I've also had this problem when the password is too long. 

M
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
it's litecoin the same to bitcoin, to configure?
and what about the adress, is also the same?
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
Huh?
"Authorization required".
Something wrong with login/password.
I got such messages when I tried to do merge mining with NMC. That time I didn't put rpcuser/password in bitcoin.cong file in Namecoin folder.
member
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
can someone help me,
what's this mean?
https://i.imgur.com/7MYYXTS.jpg
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Scattering my bits around the net since 1980
It cant be down

Well, it can be down, but only when the Internet is down.

+1
Well ... technically, no.
You just may be making your own BTC fork (I you find any blocks) or share chain fork (if you find any shares) which isn't advisable coz it will lose as soon as the internet comes back up.
Think someone should try to decentralize the internet so if part of it goes down, the rest of it stays up and keeps on working...

oh... wait... nvm... :trlf:

-- Smoov
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
It cant be down

Well, it can be down, but only when the Internet is down.

+1
Well ... technically, no.
You just may be making your own BTC fork (I you find any blocks) or share chain fork (if you find any shares) which isn't advisable coz it will lose as soon as the internet comes back up.
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
hero member
Activity: 737
Merit: 500
It cant be down

Well, it can be down, but only when the Internet is down.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
Jump to: