Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 595. (Read 2591920 times)
January 14, 2013, 08:07:31 PM
Anyone who's experiencing the memory leak: If you felt comfortable giving me SSH access to the host running P2Pool to try to diagnose the problem, it would help a lot! I've been unable to replicate this.
January 14, 2013, 12:21:31 PM
With longpool miner does not fall off. It appeared along with stratum.
It's a bug in cgminer when stratum is being used. Upgrade to the latest cgminer. If it is still happening, ask in the cgminer thread.
January 14, 2013, 06:59:10 AM
With longpool miner does not fall off. It appeared along with stratum.
January 14, 2013, 02:41:13 AM
Also don't work autorun after system restart.
(...)
And now, with p2pool 11, all this program is start, but cgminer (or bfgminer) at once crashed.
Miner don't crash only if p2pool 11 is ready.
Use cgminer 2.10.4 (...)
And now, with p2pool 11, all this program is start, but cgminer (or bfgminer) at once crashed.
Miner don't crash only if p2pool 11 is ready.
January 13, 2013, 10:21:10 PM
Also don't work autorun after system restart.
If p2pool 11 dont ready then miner is crashed.
Before, with p2pool 9 or 10, I start it with bat-file:
And now, with p2pool 11, all this program is start, but cgminer (or bfgminer) at once crashed.
Miner don't crash only if p2pool 11 is ready.
If p2pool 11 dont ready then miner is crashed.
Before, with p2pool 9 or 10, I start it with bat-file:
Code:
start bitcoin-0.7.2-win32\bitcoin-qt.exe -datadir=data -server
start p2pool_win32_10(or 9)\run_p2pool.exe bla bla bla
start cgminer-2.10.4-win32\cgminer.exe -c cgminer-2.10.4-win32\p2pool.conf
All programs is start, p2pool and cgminer wait bitcoind, then cgminer wait p2pool, then cgminer began to work.start p2pool_win32_10(or 9)\run_p2pool.exe bla bla bla
start cgminer-2.10.4-win32\cgminer.exe -c cgminer-2.10.4-win32\p2pool.conf
And now, with p2pool 11, all this program is start, but cgminer (or bfgminer) at once crashed.
Miner don't crash only if p2pool 11 is ready.
Insert sleep.exe between commands. Or you can do a script: loop waiting for proper answer from "bitcoind getinfo" for example: if it's ready, then start p2pool. Another loop - if wget is getting your localhost:9332 properly, then start cgminer.
January 13, 2013, 08:02:39 PM
Also don't work autorun after system restart.
If p2pool 11 dont ready then miner is crashed.
Before, with p2pool 9 or 10, I start it with bat-file:
And now, with p2pool 11, all this program is start, but cgminer (or bfgminer) at once crashed.
Miner don't crash only if p2pool 11 is ready.
If p2pool 11 dont ready then miner is crashed.
Before, with p2pool 9 or 10, I start it with bat-file:
Code:
start bitcoin-0.7.2-win32\bitcoin-qt.exe -datadir=data -server
start p2pool_win32_10(or 9)\run_p2pool.exe bla bla bla
start cgminer-2.10.4-win32\cgminer.exe -c cgminer-2.10.4-win32\p2pool.conf
All programs is start, p2pool and cgminer wait bitcoind, then cgminer wait p2pool, then cgminer began to work.start p2pool_win32_10(or 9)\run_p2pool.exe bla bla bla
start cgminer-2.10.4-win32\cgminer.exe -c cgminer-2.10.4-win32\p2pool.conf
And now, with p2pool 11, all this program is start, but cgminer (or bfgminer) at once crashed.
Miner don't crash only if p2pool 11 is ready.
January 13, 2013, 07:32:01 PM
If the internet disconnected, bfgminer also crashed.
But with p2pool 9 or 10 this doesn't happen.
Problem in the p2pool 11.
Maybe a bug in the protocol (stratum) ?
But with p2pool 9 or 10 this doesn't happen.
Problem in the p2pool 11.
Maybe a bug in the protocol (stratum) ?
January 13, 2013, 06:55:03 PM
lenny_
I have crash cgminer when the internet disconnected.
I have crash cgminer when the internet disconnected.
Ask in the cgminer thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/official-cgminer-mining-software-thread-for-linuxwinosxmipsarmr-pi-4110-28402
January 13, 2013, 06:40:40 PM
lenny_
I have crash cgminer when the internet disconnected.
I have crash cgminer when the internet disconnected.
January 13, 2013, 05:17:55 PM
With p2pool 11.1
I have drop cgminer or bfgminer, if drop internet connection.
With 10 version this was not.
What can I do ?
I have drop cgminer or bfgminer, if drop internet connection.
With 10 version this was not.
What can I do ?
You can learn some more english, so we can understand your babbling.
Don't have to be a dick about it.
January 13, 2013, 05:12:34 PM
you cant have 51 cons if the limit would be 50.
Well, sometimes it's above the limit.Default is 6 outgoing connections.
Now look at this:
Code:
2013-01-11 14:39:46.769000 P2Pool: 17418 shares in chain (17422 verified/17422 total) Peers: 5 (1 incoming)
2013-01-11 14:39:48.734000 Lost peer 80.87.240.47:9333 - Connection to the other side was lost in a non-clean fashion.
2013-01-11 14:39:49.452000 Outgoing connection to peer 168.7.116.243:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.1-50-ga80f1ab'
2013-01-11 14:39:52.369000 Outgoing connection to peer 31.169.66.66:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.0-2-g0981bdf'
2013-01-11 14:39:52.556000 Outgoing connection to peer 80.218.174.253:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.1'
2013-01-11 14:39:52.806000 P2Pool: 17418 shares in chain (17422 verified/17423 total) Peers: 7 (1 incoming)
2013-01-11 14:39:53.024000 Outgoing connection to peer 76.93.79.221:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.0-2-g0981bdf'
2013-01-11 14:39:55.832000 P2Pool: 17418 shares in chain (17422 verified/17424 total) Peers: 8 (1 incoming)
2013-01-11 14:39:48.734000 Lost peer 80.87.240.47:9333 - Connection to the other side was lost in a non-clean fashion.
2013-01-11 14:39:49.452000 Outgoing connection to peer 168.7.116.243:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.1-50-ga80f1ab'
2013-01-11 14:39:52.369000 Outgoing connection to peer 31.169.66.66:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.0-2-g0981bdf'
2013-01-11 14:39:52.556000 Outgoing connection to peer 80.218.174.253:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.1'
2013-01-11 14:39:52.806000 P2Pool: 17418 shares in chain (17422 verified/17423 total) Peers: 7 (1 incoming)
2013-01-11 14:39:53.024000 Outgoing connection to peer 76.93.79.221:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.0-2-g0981bdf'
2013-01-11 14:39:55.832000 P2Pool: 17418 shares in chain (17422 verified/17424 total) Peers: 8 (1 incoming)
January 13, 2013, 05:06:13 PM
you cant have 51 cons if the limit would be 50.
Well, sometimes it's above the limit.Default is 6 outgoing connections.
Now look at this:
Code:
2013-01-11 14:39:46.769000 P2Pool: 17418 shares in chain (17422 verified/17422 total) Peers: 5 (1 incoming)
2013-01-11 14:39:48.734000 Lost peer 80.87.240.47:9333 - Connection to the other side was lost in a non-clean fashion.
2013-01-11 14:39:49.452000 Outgoing connection to peer 168.7.116.243:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.1-50-ga80f1ab'
2013-01-11 14:39:52.369000 Outgoing connection to peer 31.169.66.66:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.0-2-g0981bdf'
2013-01-11 14:39:52.556000 Outgoing connection to peer 80.218.174.253:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.1'
2013-01-11 14:39:52.806000 P2Pool: 17418 shares in chain (17422 verified/17423 total) Peers: 7 (1 incoming)
2013-01-11 14:39:53.024000 Outgoing connection to peer 76.93.79.221:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.0-2-g0981bdf'
2013-01-11 14:39:55.832000 P2Pool: 17418 shares in chain (17422 verified/17424 total) Peers: 8 (1 incoming)
2013-01-11 14:39:48.734000 Lost peer 80.87.240.47:9333 - Connection to the other side was lost in a non-clean fashion.
2013-01-11 14:39:49.452000 Outgoing connection to peer 168.7.116.243:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.1-50-ga80f1ab'
2013-01-11 14:39:52.369000 Outgoing connection to peer 31.169.66.66:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.0-2-g0981bdf'
2013-01-11 14:39:52.556000 Outgoing connection to peer 80.218.174.253:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.1'
2013-01-11 14:39:52.806000 P2Pool: 17418 shares in chain (17422 verified/17423 total) Peers: 7 (1 incoming)
2013-01-11 14:39:53.024000 Outgoing connection to peer 76.93.79.221:9333 established. p2pool version: 1100 '11.0-2-g0981bdf'
2013-01-11 14:39:55.832000 P2Pool: 17418 shares in chain (17422 verified/17424 total) Peers: 8 (1 incoming)
January 13, 2013, 02:57:00 PM
With p2pool 11.1
I have drop cgminer or bfgminer, if drop internet connection.
With 10 version this was not.
What can I do ?
I have drop cgminer or bfgminer, if drop internet connection.
With 10 version this was not.
What can I do ?
You can learn some more english, so we can understand your babbling.
January 13, 2013, 02:24:43 PM
http://nogleg.com:9332/static/graphs.html?Week
the memory thing could possibly be linked to establishing an extra outgoing connection that isn't supposed to be established, they seem to coincide with the straight angled mem usage
i got 50 outgoing cons and got 423MB mean usage, so this isnt possible.the memory thing could possibly be linked to establishing an extra outgoing connection that isn't supposed to be established, they seem to coincide with the straight angled mem usage
you cant have 51 cons if the limit would be 50.
January 13, 2013, 02:23:24 PM
With p2pool 11.1
I have drop cgminer or bfgminer, if drop internet connection.
With 10 version this was not.
What can I do ?
I have drop cgminer or bfgminer, if drop internet connection.
With 10 version this was not.
What can I do ?
January 13, 2013, 01:19:43 PM
http://nogleg.com:9332/static/graphs.html?Week
the memory thing could possibly be linked to establishing an extra outgoing connection that isn't supposed to be established, they seem to coincide with the straight angled mem usage
i got 50 outgoing cons and got 423MB mean usage, so this isnt possible.the memory thing could possibly be linked to establishing an extra outgoing connection that isn't supposed to be established, they seem to coincide with the straight angled mem usage
January 13, 2013, 12:27:30 PM
http://nogleg.com:9332/static/graphs.html?Week
the memory thing could possibly be linked to establishing an extra outgoing connection that isn't supposed to be established, they seem to coincide with the straight angled mem usage
i got 50 outgoing cons and got 423MB mean usage, so this isnt possible. the memory thing could possibly be linked to establishing an extra outgoing connection that isn't supposed to be established, they seem to coincide with the straight angled mem usage
January 13, 2013, 12:23:43 PM
http://nogleg.com:9332/static/graphs.html?Week
the memory thing could possibly be linked to establishing an extra outgoing connection that isn't supposed to be established, they seem to coincide with the straight angled mem usage
the memory thing could possibly be linked to establishing an extra outgoing connection that isn't supposed to be established, they seem to coincide with the straight angled mem usage
January 13, 2013, 10:18:39 AM
ravn_3pl,
AFAIK you're running a Virtual Machine with absolutely everything (except basic kernel and console access) cutted off. IMO it cannot be compared to results provided by people running it on real servers with many services, older but stable Linux kernel etc. running on same hardware all at once.
Why? We talking about Python, it is connected somehow to hardware running program that only run program that NOT use hardware (only ram and cpu)?AFAIK you're running a Virtual Machine with absolutely everything (except basic kernel and console access) cutted off. IMO it cannot be compared to results provided by people running it on real servers with many services, older but stable Linux kernel etc. running on same hardware all at once.
I don't know, I am not Linux expert:) This may be related to: python version and/or Linux kernel version. Probably it needs more attention from forrestv or someone else able to investigate those memory leaks.
January 13, 2013, 10:11:27 AM
ravn_3pl,
AFAIK you're running a Virtual Machine with absolutely everything (except basic kernel and console access) cutted off. IMO it cannot be compared to results provided by people running it on real servers with many services, older but stable Linux kernel etc. running on same hardware all at once.
Why? We talking about Python, it is connected somehow to hardware running program that only run program that NOT use hardware (only ram and cpu)?AFAIK you're running a Virtual Machine with absolutely everything (except basic kernel and console access) cutted off. IMO it cannot be compared to results provided by people running it on real servers with many services, older but stable Linux kernel etc. running on same hardware all at once.
I don't know, I am not Linux expert:) This may be related to: python version and/or Linux kernel version. Probably it needs more attention from forrestv or someone else able to investigate those memory leaks.
Jump to: