Author

Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 697. (Read 2591919 times)

legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008
hey guys. having a little difficulty getting setup here. my miner (ufasoft, through guiminer) isn't able to complete a handshake with a locally running p2pool node. the handshake is timing out. any thoughts?
Smoovious thinks "details?"

-- Smoov


running latest p2pool software, which is up and running problem free. attempt to connect to http:127.0.0.1:9332 with the proper name and password results in "handshake timed out, disconnecting from 127.0.0.1:51084"
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
Crazy, google has zero results.

Edit: WTF
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Scattering my bits around the net since 1980
hey guys. having a little difficulty getting setup here. my miner (ufasoft, through guiminer) isn't able to complete a handshake with a locally running p2pool node. the handshake is timing out. any thoughts?
Smoovious thinks "details?"

-- Smoov
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008
hey guys. having a little difficulty getting setup here. my miner (ufasoft, through guiminer) isn't able to complete a handshake with a locally running p2pool node. the handshake is timing out. any thoughts?
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Web Dev, Db Admin, Computer Technician
The total network is producing ⊅7450 per 24hrs for 11.91 TH/s. How many ⊅ per GH/s is that?
http://bitcoincharts.com/bitcoin/

How does that compare to the current expected value of ⊅0.58016 per GH/s based on the current difficulty?
What is the current p2pool payout per GH/s?

Being PPLNS, the payout to each address is dependent upon the total shares in the chain, and the number of shares at that the address has in the chain. The share finding functions similarly to how block finding does, IIRC, so it's ****-based. For example, with 1.3ghash in my miner, my payout fluctuates between .17BTC/block found and .26BTC/block found. It would be difficult to use your suggested calculations in order to determine the overall pool **** over time, or even today.
Huh

I have only used p2pool and my current daily average = ⊅0.66846 per Gigahash.
Are you tracking your received ⊅ from p2pool?
Do you know when you started using p2pool?
If yes, then developing an average payout per day is elementary.

Providing it in a stat page would be awesome. Previous 24hr total hashrate, Previous 24hr total payouts, history per day and a monthly average. I will donate 1 BTC to see it happen!
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
The luck should be based on the total 1-diff shares generated each block
(i.e. if a share is 700 diff then of course that counts as 700 1-diff shares)
The expected number of shares is the difficulty.
So to get luck a simple example would be shares/diff
(i.e. > 1 is bad luck, < 1 is good luck)

The fact that the history is lost (hidden ... wiped ... gone)
means that it is unlikely to get any reliable stats from anyone who hasn't kept that history

(Edit: even shares isn't perfect, but it is as accurate as any pool can be)
hero member
Activity: 682
Merit: 500
The total network is producing ⊅7450 per 24hrs for 11.91 TH/s. How many ⊅ per GH/s is that?
http://bitcoincharts.com/bitcoin/

How does that compare to the current expected value of ⊅0.58016 per GH/s based on the current difficulty?
What is the current p2pool payout per GH/s?

Being PPLNS, the payout to each address is dependent upon the total shares in the chain, and the number of shares at that the address has in the chain. The share finding functions similarly to how block finding does, IIRC, so it's ****-based. For example, with 1.3ghash in my miner, my payout fluctuates between .17BTC/block found and .26BTC/block found. It would be difficult to use your suggested calculations in order to determine the overall pool **** over time, or even today.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Web Dev, Db Admin, Computer Technician
The total network is producing ⊅7450 per 24hrs for 11.91 TH/s. How many ⊅ per GH/s is that?
http://bitcoincharts.com/bitcoin/

How does that compare to the current expected value of ⊅0.58016 per GH/s based on the current difficulty?
What is the current p2pool payout per GH/s?
full member
Activity: 373
Merit: 100
So, pool is still showing >30% stales. Is that a bug because of the old versions mining on a "fork" or is something else going on?

If I understood the problem correctly, anyone with the faulty build will *only* produce stales (because of the protocol switch) - so ~30% stales and ~30% faulty versions seems to work out...
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
So, pool is still showing >30% stales. Is that a bug because of the old versions mining on a "fork" or is something else going on?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Web Dev, Db Admin, Computer Technician
Quote from: forrestv
However, P2Pool is open source - there's no closed server that could be secretly diverting hashes.
It doesn't have to be p2pool software doing the diverting, there are other softwares installed also. I see p2pool more as a target than hiding some hidden attack/assault/diversion agenda.
Quote from: forrestv
It's either a bug somewhere (which I've been trying like mad to find) or just really bad luck.
Barring some "luck" bug, it may require thinking outside the p2pool software box.

How far back do your stats go, can there be a correlation between updates and efficiency/luck?
Can p2pool gather stats on miner software used, OS of a miner, miner software stats like efficiency, rejected, etc.?

Quote from: Garr255
Regardless, its still worth it to mine with P2Pool!
Quote from: kjj
+1

10% is totally worth it.  Don't care if it is a bug, a security problem, bad luck, the phase of Ivpeter, "ghosts", whatever.
I get that you are willing to take one for the team, but where are you taking it? Are they using grease?

You have a widget factory and next door is another widget factory producing exactly what you are producing using the same equipment that you are using. Both of your products are priced the same. You have set up your equipment to be as productive as it can be without killing your workers. You have access to the exact same markets. If all things appear to be equal and yet you are producing 10% less then the widget plant next door, then the question is why? What is causing the 10% reduced production based on other widget manufacturers? Is it an internal issue or an external issue?
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Agreed. I've been taking the 10% hit like everyone else over the past months. Leaving P2pool and decreasing the hashing power just makes it harder and harder to find blocks and increase our ****. And let's be honest, when the **** is good, it's goodWink

I was reading through the earlier posts in here and came across this:

http://p2poolparty.org/stats.html

Assuming the link is accurate, there aren't a whole lot of people in p2pool.  I assume some of these addresses are other pools, like p2pmining, but still, the list is smaller than I thought.

M
hero member
Activity: 682
Merit: 500
Agreed. I've been taking the 10% hit like everyone else over the past months. Leaving P2pool and decreasing the hashing power just makes it harder and harder to find blocks and increase our ****. And let's be honest, when the **** is good, it's goodWink
kjj
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1026
If luck is the explanation of the frequency of block discovery, then we are discovering 10% below what is possible on average. The below average discovery rate could indicate resource diversion, which has already been shown publicly to occur. You could say that "Luck" is how to explain away resource diversion.

However, P2Pool is open source - there's no closed server that could be secretly diverting hashes. Please, do audit the source. It's either a bug somewhere (which I've been trying like mad to find) or just really bad luck.

Regardless, its still worth it to mine with P2Pool!

+1

10% is totally worth it.  Don't care if it is a bug, a security problem, bad luck, the phase of Ivpeter, "ghosts", whatever.

My post history will show that I started with btc guild in their very early days, and that I have nothing but good things to say about E.  My default distribution of p2pcoin even uses btc guild for backup.  But p2pool is just plain healthier for bitcoin, in the long run.  And I care more about bitcoin today and tomorrow than I care about the balance in my wallet.
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
What's a GPU?
If luck is the explanation of the frequency of block discovery, then we are discovering 10% below what is possible on average. The below average discovery rate could indicate resource diversion, which has already been shown publicly to occur. You could say that "Luck" is how to explain away resource diversion.

However, P2Pool is open source - there's no closed server that could be secretly diverting hashes. Please, do audit the source. It's either a bug somewhere (which I've been trying like mad to find) or just really bad luck.

Regardless, its still worth it to mine with P2Pool!
hero member
Activity: 516
Merit: 643
If luck is the explanation of the frequency of block discovery, then we are discovering 10% below what is possible on average. The below average discovery rate could indicate resource diversion, which has already been shown publicly to occur. You could say that "Luck" is how to explain away resource diversion.

However, P2Pool is open source - there's no closed server that could be secretly diverting hashes. Please, do audit the source. It's either a bug somewhere (which I've been trying like mad to find) or just really bad luck.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
I see, nevermind Smiley
Death, what happened to your avatar?
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
So you're telling me that every time I get an NMC block, I also found a BTC block? So the 200 NMC I got over the past 2 months, I could have also gotten 200 BTC? I made only like 10 BTC using p2p/pools.

No.

NMC difficulty is lower than BTC.  Any block which solves BTC difficulty also solves NMC difficulty (because it is lower).  The reverse isn't true..
Jump to: