Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 756. (Read 2591916 times)
March 07, 2012, 03:32:46 AM
Thank you!! It works!
March 07, 2012, 03:31:24 AM
March 07, 2012, 03:29:11 AM
Hi!
Since day 27 feb 2012, the patron_sendmany stops working for me... Just now I take notice of it...
Look:
$ wget -O- http://192.168.10.1:9332/patron_sendmany?total=2.0 | more
--2012-03-06 02:08:05-- http://192.168.1.235:9332/patron_sendmany?total=200
Connecting to 192.168.1.235:9332... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 50 [text/plain]
Saving to: `STDOUT'
100%[===============================================================================================================================>] 50 --.-K/s in 0s
2012-03-06 02:08:05 (4.23 MB/s) - written to stdout [50/50]
need total argument. go to patron_sendmany/
For both Bitcoin 9332 and Litecoin 9327 I got this...
Any tip!?
Thanks!
Thiago
Since day 27 feb 2012, the patron_sendmany stops working for me... Just now I take notice of it...
Look:
$ wget -O- http://192.168.10.1:9332/patron_sendmany?total=2.0 | more
--2012-03-06 02:08:05-- http://192.168.1.235:9332/patron_sendmany?total=200
Connecting to 192.168.1.235:9332... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 50 [text/plain]
Saving to: `STDOUT'
100%[===============================================================================================================================>] 50 --.-K/s in 0s
2012-03-06 02:08:05 (4.23 MB/s) - written to stdout [50/50]
need total argument. go to patron_sendmany/
For both Bitcoin 9332 and Litecoin 9327 I got this...
Any tip!?
Thanks!
Thiago
Please, someone help me!! How to use patron_sendmany these days?!
It's "patron_sendmany/
Well, I read that and it does not work... Before send this question, I already have tried a lot of ways... No one seems to work.
I already try that:
Code:
usuario@desk:~$ wget -O- http://192.168.10.1:9327/patron_sendmany/total=200.00 | more
--2012-03-07 05:25:18-- http://192.168.1.235:9327/patron_sendmany/total=200.00
Connecting to 192.168.1.235:9327... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 500 Internal Server Error
2012-03-07 05:25:18 ERROR 500: Internal Server Error.
usuario@desk:~$ wget -O- http://192.168.10.1:9327/patron_sendmany/TOTAL=200.00 | more
--2012-03-07 05:25:27-- http://192.168.1.235:9327/patron_sendmany/TOTAL=200.00
Connecting to 192.168.1.235:9327... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 500 Internal Server Error
2012-03-07 05:25:27 ERROR 500: Internal Server Error.
So, how to use patron_sendmany with new version of P2Pool?!
-
Thiago
March 07, 2012, 02:50:13 AM
I was thinking it would be cool if p2pool.info listed how much has been donated as subsidies. Maybe that could be added into the luck calculation, too.
March 07, 2012, 01:33:42 AM
Hi!
Since day 27 feb 2012, the patron_sendmany stops working for me... Just now I take notice of it...
Look:
$ wget -O- http://192.168.10.1:9332/patron_sendmany?total=2.0 | more
--2012-03-06 02:08:05-- http://192.168.1.235:9332/patron_sendmany?total=200
Connecting to 192.168.1.235:9332... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 50 [text/plain]
Saving to: `STDOUT'
100%[===============================================================================================================================>] 50 --.-K/s in 0s
2012-03-06 02:08:05 (4.23 MB/s) - written to stdout [50/50]
need total argument. go to patron_sendmany/
For both Bitcoin 9332 and Litecoin 9327 I got this...
Any tip!?
Thanks!
Thiago
Since day 27 feb 2012, the patron_sendmany stops working for me... Just now I take notice of it...
Look:
$ wget -O- http://192.168.10.1:9332/patron_sendmany?total=2.0 | more
--2012-03-06 02:08:05-- http://192.168.1.235:9332/patron_sendmany?total=200
Connecting to 192.168.1.235:9332... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 50 [text/plain]
Saving to: `STDOUT'
100%[===============================================================================================================================>] 50 --.-K/s in 0s
2012-03-06 02:08:05 (4.23 MB/s) - written to stdout [50/50]
need total argument. go to patron_sendmany/
For both Bitcoin 9332 and Litecoin 9327 I got this...
Any tip!?
Thanks!
Thiago
Please, someone help me!! How to use patron_sendmany these days?!
It's "patron_sendmany/
March 07, 2012, 01:21:24 AM
Hi!
Since day 27 feb 2012, the patron_sendmany stops working for me... Just now I take notice of it...
Look:
$ wget -O- http://192.168.10.1:9332/patron_sendmany?total=2.0 | more
--2012-03-06 02:08:05-- http://192.168.1.235:9332/patron_sendmany?total=200
Connecting to 192.168.1.235:9332... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 50 [text/plain]
Saving to: `STDOUT'
100%[===============================================================================================================================>] 50 --.-K/s in 0s
2012-03-06 02:08:05 (4.23 MB/s) - written to stdout [50/50]
need total argument. go to patron_sendmany/
For both Bitcoin 9332 and Litecoin 9327 I got this...
Any tip!?
Thanks!
Thiago
Since day 27 feb 2012, the patron_sendmany stops working for me... Just now I take notice of it...
Look:
$ wget -O- http://192.168.10.1:9332/patron_sendmany?total=2.0 | more
--2012-03-06 02:08:05-- http://192.168.1.235:9332/patron_sendmany?total=200
Connecting to 192.168.1.235:9332... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 50 [text/plain]
Saving to: `STDOUT'
100%[===============================================================================================================================>] 50 --.-K/s in 0s
2012-03-06 02:08:05 (4.23 MB/s) - written to stdout [50/50]
need total argument. go to patron_sendmany/
For both Bitcoin 9332 and Litecoin 9327 I got this...
Any tip!?
Thanks!
Thiago
Please, someone help me!! How to use patron_sendmany these days?!
March 07, 2012, 01:02:45 AM
I'm also getting the "2012-02-26 02:31:41.256425 > raise ValueError('old share an hour after switch time')
2012-02-26 02:31:41.256481 > exceptions.ValueError: old share an hour after switch time" error message
2012-02-26 02:31:41.256481 > exceptions.ValueError: old share an hour after switch time" error message
This is normal. Some other people haven't upgraded P2Pool and are messing with the rest..
yee
Quote
.................
Got share hash, requesting! Hash: b4b97d3e
2012-03-07 04:23:07.068000 Sending 1 shares to 74.69.38.251:53478
2012-03-07 04:23:07.070000 RECV shares 010....................
2012-03-07 04:23:07.072000 > Error handling message: (see RECV line)
2012-03-07 04:23:07.073000 > Traceback (most recent call last):
..............
Got share hash, requesting! Hash: b4b97d3e
2012-03-07 04:23:07.068000 Sending 1 shares to 74.69.38.251:53478
2012-03-07 04:23:07.070000 RECV shares 010....................
2012-03-07 04:23:07.072000 > Error handling message: (see RECV line)
2012-03-07 04:23:07.073000 > Traceback (most recent call last):
..............
hey man! 74.69.38.25 !
could you please update your pool....it is very restlessly - alot of log errors
March 06, 2012, 11:59:24 PM
Ah, thanks for the explanation. That's good to know.
March 06, 2012, 09:43:43 PM
does p2pool daemon show anything in output when it is using higher share difficulty. I tired /1000 and it doesn't seem to have any effect.
I bumped it up to somewhere around 0.024-ish in my Litecoin p2pool instance, and the new value was reflected in the "share difficulty" lines of p2pool's output. The expected time-to-share doesn't seem to have (yet?) updated, though.
It won't. You could have multiple miners connected so the only sane thing to do is display the estimates for the default options.
March 06, 2012, 08:59:07 PM
does p2pool daemon show anything in output when it is using higher share difficulty. I tired /1000 and it doesn't seem to have any effect.
I bumped it up to somewhere around 0.024-ish in my Litecoin p2pool instance, and the new value was reflected in the "share difficulty" lines of p2pool's output. The expected time-to-share doesn't seem to have (yet?) updated, though.
March 06, 2012, 08:55:49 PM
Yupp.
March 06, 2012, 08:44:00 PM
Variance, blah. 
What a shitty day.
What a shitty day. March 06, 2012, 05:33:37 PM
Yes, with a username like "x/1024+16" it should show up similar to this:
2012-03-06 17:31:12.554000 P2Pool: 17472 shares in chain (11125/17476) Peers: 14 (4 incoming)
2012-03-06 17:31:12.555000 Local: 458MH/s in last 10.0 minutes doa: ~0.0% (0-49%) time to share: 1.8 hours
2012-03-06 17:31:12.555000 Shares: 3 (1, 0) Stale: ~33.3% (6-80%) Efficiency: ~72.1% (22-102%) Pay: 0.040 BTC
2012-03-06 17:31:12.555000 Pool: 289GH/s Stale rate: 7.6% Time to block: 6.2 hours Blocks: 1
2012-03-06 17:31:30.921000 NW: Diff: 16.0 / 1024.0 Block value: 50.049500 BTC 82 transactions
2012-03-06 17:31:40.273000 NW: Diff: 16.0 / 1024.0 Block value: 50.049500 BTC 82 transactions
2012-03-06 17:31:47.031000 NW: Diff: 16.0 / 1024.0 Block value: 50.049500 BTC 82 transactions
2012-03-06 17:31:12.554000 P2Pool: 17472 shares in chain (11125/17476) Peers: 14 (4 incoming)
2012-03-06 17:31:12.555000 Local: 458MH/s in last 10.0 minutes doa: ~0.0% (0-49%) time to share: 1.8 hours
2012-03-06 17:31:12.555000 Shares: 3 (1, 0) Stale: ~33.3% (6-80%) Efficiency: ~72.1% (22-102%) Pay: 0.040 BTC
2012-03-06 17:31:12.555000 Pool: 289GH/s Stale rate: 7.6% Time to block: 6.2 hours Blocks: 1
2012-03-06 17:31:30.921000 NW: Diff: 16.0 / 1024.0 Block value: 50.049500 BTC 82 transactions
2012-03-06 17:31:40.273000 NW: Diff: 16.0 / 1024.0 Block value: 50.049500 BTC 82 transactions
2012-03-06 17:31:47.031000 NW: Diff: 16.0 / 1024.0 Block value: 50.049500 BTC 82 transactions
does p2pool daemon show anything in output when it is using higher share difficulty. I tired /1000 and it doesn't seem to have any effect.
March 06, 2012, 04:07:49 PM
does p2pool daemon show anything in output when it is using higher share difficulty. I tired /1000 and it doesn't seem to have any effect.
March 06, 2012, 01:51:37 PM
Hi!
Since day 27 feb 2012, the patron_sendmany stops working for me... Just now I take notice of it...
Look:
$ wget -O- http://192.168.10.1:9332/patron_sendmany?total=2.0 | more
--2012-03-06 02:08:05-- http://192.168.1.235:9332/patron_sendmany?total=200
Connecting to 192.168.1.235:9332... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 50 [text/plain]
Saving to: `STDOUT'
100%[===============================================================================================================================>] 50 --.-K/s in 0s
2012-03-06 02:08:05 (4.23 MB/s) - written to stdout [50/50]
need total argument. go to patron_sendmany/
For both Bitcoin 9332 and Litecoin 9327 I got this...
Any tip!?
Thanks!
Thiago
Since day 27 feb 2012, the patron_sendmany stops working for me... Just now I take notice of it...
Look:
$ wget -O- http://192.168.10.1:9332/patron_sendmany?total=2.0 | more
--2012-03-06 02:08:05-- http://192.168.1.235:9332/patron_sendmany?total=200
Connecting to 192.168.1.235:9332... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 50 [text/plain]
Saving to: `STDOUT'
100%[===============================================================================================================================>] 50 --.-K/s in 0s
2012-03-06 02:08:05 (4.23 MB/s) - written to stdout [50/50]
need total argument. go to patron_sendmany/
For both Bitcoin 9332 and Litecoin 9327 I got this...
Any tip!?
Thanks!
Thiago
Do what it says. "patron_sendmany/
March 06, 2012, 11:33:44 AM
Hi!
Since day 27 feb 2012, the patron_sendmany stops working for me... Just now I take notice of it...
Since day 27 feb 2012, the patron_sendmany stops working for me... Just now I take notice of it...
Thiago, change the URL from http://192.168.10.1:9332/patron_sendmany?total=2.0 to http://192.168.10.1:9332/patron_sendmany/2.0 . Sorry for not posting about this... I changed the way web api calls like this work.
EDIT: DeathAndTaxes, thanks for clarifying the difficulty-cheating issue!
March 06, 2012, 10:16:04 AM
Well from a purely EV standpoint there is no difference. In the long run you will always get 100% PPS (minus any donations plus any subsidies).
From a selfish standpoint lower target = lower variance. However if everyone runs min diff then for a given hashrate, diff will be higher and smaller miners get no "slack". Using higher diff doesn't give any revenue to miners it just lowers the min diff and that reduces variance (but not long term revenue) for smaller miners.
Obviously the higher you go the more you increase your variance (possibly by insignificant amounts) and lower variance of smaller miners.
I decided to start at a 1000. Maybe someone like meni could point us towards the math involved to get us something like with 10GH/s x% increase in diff is y% increase in payout variance over 24 hour period, 7 day period, 30 day period.
From a selfish standpoint lower target = lower variance. However if everyone runs min diff then for a given hashrate, diff will be higher and smaller miners get no "slack". Using higher diff doesn't give any revenue to miners it just lowers the min diff and that reduces variance (but not long term revenue) for smaller miners.
Obviously the higher you go the more you increase your variance (possibly by insignificant amounts) and lower variance of smaller miners.
I decided to start at a 1000. Maybe someone like meni could point us towards the math involved to get us something like with 10GH/s x% increase in diff is y% increase in payout variance over 24 hour period, 7 day period, 30 day period.
March 06, 2012, 10:07:53 AM
..Now I got it, I didnt understand the point about coinbase.
Thanks for explaining!
So, any clever calculations about which difficulty you should use, depending on your hasing power?
..And is that /1000 really miner-declared, not node-declared? Hmm..
Ente
Thanks for explaining!
So, any clever calculations about which difficulty you should use, depending on your hasing power?
..And is that /1000 really miner-declared, not node-declared? Hmm..
Ente
I had the same question, which value is best for what hashing power
.Dia
March 06, 2012, 09:49:35 AM
..Now I got it, I didnt understand the point about coinbase.
Thanks for explaining!
So, any clever calculations about which difficulty you should use, depending on your hasing power?
..And is that /1000 really miner-declared, not node-declared? Hmm..
Ente
Thanks for explaining!
So, any clever calculations about which difficulty you should use, depending on your hasing power?
..And is that /1000 really miner-declared, not node-declared? Hmm..
Ente
March 06, 2012, 09:23:11 AM
Thank you very much, DeathAndTaxes edit: and kjj.
I understand it now and set my miners to /1000
I understand it now and set my miners to /1000
Jump to: