267079680
incorrect
Topic: 1BTC - Bitcoin Treasure Hunt - Can you crack the code? [competition now closed] - page 27. (Read 25362 times)
March 03, 2015, 11:56:56 AM
March 03, 2015, 11:55:01 AM
Halfinney
actually not a bad answer, this would have been nice
not this time sorry
March 03, 2015, 11:53:16 AM
(some notes:
Alonzo Church (AC) born: 1903 - died: 1995 = Age 92
Alan Turing (AT) born: 1912 - died: 1954 = Age 42
Charles Babbage (CB) born: 1791 - died: 1871 = Age 80)
---------------------------
genesis edition 001 maybe is the key to the cipher
AC 100 AT 001 CB 000
Alonzo Church (AC) born: 1903 - died: 1995 = Age 92
Alan Turing (AT) born: 1912 - died: 1954 = Age 42
Charles Babbage (CB) born: 1791 - died: 1871 = Age 80)
---------------------------
genesis edition 001 maybe is the key to the cipher
AC 100 AT 001 CB 000
good idea, but the first part of the equation can be solved a by a 5 year old, once you have that answer you just need to throw it in the "bin"
March 03, 2015, 11:42:06 AM
It was cracked? wow.
It forms a triangle? Bermuda triangle? 000, 001, 100 in order.
The triangle contains North America.
The triangle is incomplete in one end.
It forms a triangle? Bermuda triangle? 000, 001, 100 in order.
The triangle contains North America.
The triangle is incomplete in one end.
March 03, 2015, 11:17:46 AM
NaSCasino maybe 
March 03, 2015, 09:20:34 AM
C3220132A
March 03, 2015, 09:10:35 AM
267079680
March 03, 2015, 08:57:26 AM
Halfinney
March 03, 2015, 08:40:09 AM
(some notes:
Alonzo Church (AC) born: 1903 - died: 1995 = Age 92
Alan Turing (AT) born: 1912 - died: 1954 = Age 42
Charles Babbage (CB) born: 1791 - died: 1871 = Age 80)
---------------------------
genesis edition 001 maybe is the key to the cipher
AC 100 AT 001 CB 000
Alonzo Church (AC) born: 1903 - died: 1995 = Age 92
Alan Turing (AT) born: 1912 - died: 1954 = Age 42
Charles Babbage (CB) born: 1791 - died: 1871 = Age 80)
---------------------------
genesis edition 001 maybe is the key to the cipher
AC 100 AT 001 CB 000
March 03, 2015, 08:28:40 AM
Alonzo Church = AC
Alan Turing = AT
Charles Babbage = CB
so far so good
Alan Turing = AT
Charles Babbage = CB
so far so good
March 03, 2015, 08:20:52 AM
Alonzo Church = AC
Alan Turing = AT
Charles Babbage = CB
so far so good
(some notes):
Alonzo Church (AC) born: 1903 - died: 1995 = Age 92
Alan Turing (AT) born: 1912 - died: 1954 = Age 42
Charles Babbage (CB) born: 1791 - died: 1871 = Age 80
Alan Turing = AT
Charles Babbage = CB
so far so good
(some notes):
Alonzo Church (AC) born: 1903 - died: 1995 = Age 92
Alan Turing (AT) born: 1912 - died: 1954 = Age 42
Charles Babbage (CB) born: 1791 - died: 1871 = Age 80
March 03, 2015, 08:14:19 AM
i think we have to deduct / subtract something...
the genesis number "001" looks suspicious
the genesis number "001" looks suspicious
At some point I had a thought that maybe only the second clue is used for the result (because of 001), but.. that would be.. too.. evil
You could work it out using only two virtual coins, but that is just co-incidental and shouldn't be attempted as not all combinations will yield the correct result
Can you confirm that the shaded pairs of letters are correct: AC; AT; CB because T is pretty unusual to convert?
you would be able to confirm what this means yourself by going through previous posts .... {the pairings are correct}
March 03, 2015, 07:45:33 AM
i think we have to deduct / subtract something...
the genesis number "001" looks suspicious
the genesis number "001" looks suspicious
At some point I had a thought that maybe only the second clue is used for the result (because of 001), but.. that would be.. too.. evil
You could work it out using only two virtual coins, but that is just co-incidental and shouldn't be attempted as not all combinations will yield the correct result
Can you confirm that the shaded pairs of letters are correct: AC; AT; CB because T is pretty unusual to convert?
March 03, 2015, 07:42:32 AM
i think we have to deduct / subtract something...
the genesis number "001" looks suspicious
the genesis number "001" looks suspicious
At some point I had a thought that maybe only the second clue is used for the result (because of 001), but.. that would be.. too.. evil
You could work it out using only two virtual coins, but that is just co-incidental and shouldn't be attempted as not all combinations will yield the correct result
March 03, 2015, 07:40:01 AM
i think we have to deduct / subtract something...
the genesis number "001" looks suspicious
the genesis number "001" looks suspicious
Yes a calculation is required...
March 03, 2015, 06:33:25 AM
i think we have to deduct / subtract something...
the genesis number "001" looks suspicious
the genesis number "001" looks suspicious
At some point I had a thought that maybe only the second clue is used for the result (because of 001), but.. that would be.. too.. evil
March 03, 2015, 06:20:17 AM
i think we have to deduct / subtract something...
the genesis number "001" looks suspicious
the genesis number "001" looks suspicious
March 03, 2015, 05:52:46 AM
Any further clues would be much appreciated 
March 03, 2015, 05:08:44 AM
Maybe it's some sort of operation between those letter and the binary numbers on the picture.
CB 000
TA 001
CA 100
A = 1 ?
B = 2 ?
C = 3 ?
T = 20 ?
3 2 - 000
20 1 - 001
3 1 - 100
CB 000
TA 001
CA 100
A = 1 ?
B = 2 ?
C = 3 ?
T = 20 ?
3 2 - 000
20 1 - 001
3 1 - 100
incorrect
March 03, 2015, 05:06:39 AM
Jump to: