Topic: 1miau Merit source application - page 2. (Read 2008 times)

I think we can safely ignore your feedback since its based on some nonsense.
Please proceed wasting your time. Bye.

You mean that you read it but too scared to continue the argument since we just crushed your pathetic excuses for the trust abuse.

Just from this brief probing of your mind it is clear you are not worthy of being a merit source. The only people supporting you are either likely to be your merit cycling fellow DT chums or those with an even more fragile mind than your own.

You failed all of the challenges. Your "opinions" are demonstrated to bogus. You called bullshit and nonsense on observable instances you now REALIZE you can not refute or debunk. So you looks stupid there. You claim it is to sully hhmapuz's reputation (which he has already destroyed himself) and all he needed to say was that he was not aware or be transparent about his actions towards those people involved.

He flat out says he REFUSES to be transparent regarding his selection process.

The entire purpose of that thread is to PUSH for TRANSPARENT FAIR RULES THAT ARE APPLIED EQUALLY TO ALL MEMBERS.  Which hhampuz says he will not be willing to do.

Now that you can also be observed in other threads calling DIFFERENT observable instances of financially motivated wrongdoing again nonsense and such terms trying to cast doubt upon them. It is quite clear that you are deliberately trying to prevent whistle blowing.

Therefore not only should you not be a merit source you should not be on DT either.

These are undeniable behaviors on your part.

The reader may notice we just ignore the member asche - that is because it is such a low functioning sig spammer from the same chipmixer group we just feel ZERO satisfaction from crushing it's feeble mind in public. It is a pitiful moron, never achieved anything of note and seems to have ass kissed its way on to DT. It would be worrying if this idiot was a merit source but since tman is a merit source there are no lower thresholds here it would seem.

I support 1Miau, thats all I can say.

He is not a "greedy" cat 

You might add that getting spammed by CH/TOAA is actually a pretty good sign that he is a good fit

Both of them are pretty vocal only when good people are involved.

I don’t know anything about German board or 1miau.
I never met him or had any exchange, post or merit, with him.
I just opened his application as a merit source by accident.

Well, I must say that is the most accurately crafted merit application I have ever seen.
Quality of informations provided, reasons because of he wants to be made source and reported posts are well written, sensible and right on spot.

Meriting this post just because I feel it is the right to do, and also to mark it, if in a distant future, there will be a chance to compile an application by myself.

Keep up with the good work and good luck with your application 1miau!

tl;dr

LOL  at this low functioning idiot.  This is not off topic. If you are unable to grasp even simple concepts like this how can you be trusted to apply merit to posts of value???

You can't just say that is your opinion and that makes it correct. You are speculating on our intentions. You have clearly demonstrated you are too stupid to form reliable opinions. We are asking you to now demonstrate you are capable of forming a reliable opinion that does not fall apart under even mild scrutiny. This is vital for merit to one day have any meaning here.

NOW RE READ AND ANSWER SPECIFICALLY.

You are repeating FALSE ACCUSATIONS that you made earlier. We are challenging them directly. Your LACK of ability to recognize these direct challenges is evidence that  you are too stupid to be a merit source.

1. Bring the specific " unproven nonsense" that we were asking Hhampuz if he had direct knowledge of - that clearly demonstrates our intention was to damage hhampuz reputation. You need to understand that you are dealing with observable instance, events that undeniably took place.

You do understand you can not cast those aside as simply "bullshit" , "nonsense"  "our opinions"  and then those observable instances vanish just like that.

A low functioning dreg such as yourself ( I say that based on the clear evidence in this thread) can not speculate on the intentions of those far smarter. You are UNABLE to provide any refutation to those observable instances we were asking hhampuz if he had knowledge of but now you claim those instances  are bullshit nonsense??

Do you not see how stupid you appear?

You don't just get to say it's my opinion that these observable instances are bullshit nonsense LOL  and now I will say you are untrustworthy for asking if someone that may be directly employing these people are aware of these observable instances?? haha

How does that sully hhampuz reputation?? all he has to say is I WAS NOT AWARE or NOW THAT I AM AWARE I WILL NO LONGER EMPLOY THEM or I WILL GIVE A TRANSPARENT ANSWER AS TO MY ACTIONS REGARDING THEM.

Your entire argument that hinges on YOUR OPINION falls to pieces in our hands, with just a gentle probing. Bit like your mommy would.

NOW TRY AGAIN.

Demonstrate you are capable of understanding even very simple concepts.

You want to CLAIM something is bullshit, or nonsense then you must be able to demonstrate that. You have zero hope of doing that when someone is only presenting observable instances.

Now delete your merit source application until you can grasp simple concepts like this. You have no business trying to fathom where values lays in any specific thread. Back to school silly bitch.

Can you not see how we are crushing your feeble mind in public to any reader with even an average level of intelligence?  we almost feel sorry for you. Please stop forcing us to do it to you 1moron.

HHampuz subsequent to that thread has sullied his own reputation.

1. He refuses to be transparent about his selection process (seems shady, why not be transparent if you have nothing to hide)?
There should be transparent and fair rules for sig campaigns that ensure ALL members are treated equally.
2. He supported doxing of the forum treasurer placing him and the boards funds at risk
3. He is now implicated in a possible 0.5btc theft a projects funds - there has been NO CLEAR explanation as far as we can see.


Your "opinions" are laughable. Since his selection process he REFUSES to make transparent, then again is simply your opinion and that is obviously just a joke.


1miau to stupid to be a merit source. Also looks to be deliberately attempting to silence whistle blowing or the presentation of observable instances that demonstrate "some members" are involved with financially dangerous behaviors.

Can you publish your top 20 merit fans and recipients? also those that include your on DT? thanks.

Just hit the Ignore button .
As i has written only "  Hieroglyphen and nonsense coming from CH " and its a waste of time to write to him !
Keep your way going and for sure you are worth to be a Merit Source and i trust you that you will be doing that job very good!

Obviously you are too dumb to read my trust feedback. You have gotten that feedback because your only intention was to damage the reputation of Hhampuz with unproven nonsense (you call it "questions").  
He's an excellent signature campaing manager and his achievements for the forum are outstanding.

If some other services are also interested to hire Hhampuz, they might read your bullshit that Hhampuz would reject good posters knowingly with malicious intent and that's just an outright lie. Everyone can check that Hhampuz is well-known for choosing the best users for campaigns managed by him.
You are damaging his business with malicious intent. Your accusation out of nowhere shows how dangerous you are. Obviously, I wouldn't trust such kind of users and avoid to send them money - not a single satoshi.

Maybe you are so pissed because he rejects shitposters effectively.  


Aside from that your accusations against me are totally off-topic and not related to my Merit source application. If you want to discuss it further (although everything is said) create a new not selfmoderated thread in Reputation. If you can't do that you'll just show what your real intention is: damaging the reputation of other users at any cost.

It's tiresome...



Enuff off-topic in my Merit source application...

---

I can agree here, there are times when qwk is very busy distributing Merit because he's distrubuting nearly 50% of all Merit on our local board and if he hasn't much time, some posts made during that time receive less Merit or threads where he isn't active, too.

can´t agree more with the snipped parts and love your pun.

Anyway have to disagree with the statement quoted, since there are many valuable posts in the German Sub, which QWK can not merit as much as he could (compared to merits received for less or similar quality/content in our language-Sub´s).


Just use the "report" button and ignore "him/her/them".

You seem to be pretty good at taking things out of context. You should stop.

Several valued members have been selling/buying accounts in the old days. Nutildah tried to sell an account with exactly 0 trading history or positive feedback afaik.

Your point is totally invalid.

Back to 1miau, I think you have no clue what a merit source should be, because not a single message of yours in this  thread shows that he is unfit for that duty.

Lol, again a huge wall of nonsense. I'm always surprised why you can write so much but provide nothing new. Shitposters would be proud of that skill.

Everyone can read your bullshit in public and no one cares what you are saying because you have proven that you and your alts are toxic members and your only intention is to damage users you don't like. 
Do you think all of your negative ratings are false or maybe you are the moron here?

Actually, I should give you one more tag because of your lie about TMAN's PMs. 
Or can you prove it? 
Please present OBSERVABLE PROOF. 
Otherwise you are indeed a LIAR and PROVEN dishonest.


I think everyone can read the trust pages of you and your sockpuppet alts. So yes, you and your sockpuppets ("we") are dishonest.
Or who is "we"? If it's not your sockpuppets, "we" means that you are sharing your account with different people? I can't imagine that sharing your account is trustworthy.

If you don't like my sent feedback add ~1miau to your trust list.
If you don't like Hhampuz' way of managing campaigns don't join them and if you think you could do it better, become campaign manager yourself and we will see if the members of this forum will prefer your campaigns or the campaigns of Hhampuz.


Looks like I'm indeed proven wrong that The-Bullshit-Above-All is a pitiful idiot and there's no hope that he will change his attitude. My bad.

100% agreed.

@TOAA just crawl back into your darkhole, nobody wants to read you ranting everywhere.

Plus this is perfect non sense.

Back to 1miau's application:

1miau is the perfect man for the job!
He spends his merits wisely and without counting. He is also a nice person in general and easy to talk to. I also trust him (see feedback).

The only negative point in my mind is, there isn't really any merit missing in the german section. The local source qwk is already doing a phantastisch job (pun intended).

If there is a limited count of merit sources, maybe some other local boards need it more. If this is not the case, let it rain!

Well then you have demonstrated EXACTLY WHY you can NOT be a merit source. Your post clearly demonstrates you are low functioning.

Watch how I will pull you apart in public here as a lesson to other low functioning dregs of your type.  You simply do not have the capacity to allocate merit to posts of value.

1. Present the observable instances that are FALSE  and tell me how YOU can prove they ARE FALSE. These instances are not opinions these are events that took place.  We have presented clearly an observable instance that demonstrates lying and scamming and several other instances that provide a strong case with regard clear financially motivated wrong doing.  That is not slinging mud and opinions they are clear instances that are independently verifiable.   Prove them ALL to be FALSE. If you can not then you are WRONG.

2. We are ASKING.. HHampuz if HE KNOWINGLY is employing these types of people in his campaigns. (subsequent to this HHampuz ADMITTED that he would NOT be transparent about this rules for employing or refusing to employ people for sig campaigns that he controls on behalf of projects - which as we explained leaves him wide open and his projects wide open to a lot of valid criticism and questions). That is a question we wanted answered. Your opinion of the intention means nothing noob trash. If he was knowingly employing these types of people then he WAS if he was NOT then he could answer on thread. If he could refute the observable instances then he was free to do that too.

3. Any other "OPINIONS" you have reached are your own problem. Screaming "defamation and lies" is actually simply FALSE ACCUSATIONS on your part.  Only someone as dumb as yourself can not see that. Well done moron.

4. Now you further dig yourself further in to a corner by claiming. WE HAVE BEEN PROVEN dishonest MULTIPLE times.  PRESENT 1 instance of being PROVEN dishonest. PROOF is what we want to see. Not your opinion of others speculations.

You see what is "clear to you" means NOTHING.  Failure to see that is exactly why you are not fit to be a merit source. What is the point of having low functioning ass kissing fools like 1miua giving out merit? you simply do NOT have the capacity to recognize a post of value.

What you are suggesting is this.

That a person like hhmapuz who's actions are lately

1. refusing to be transparent in his campaign selection process (seems very shady)
2. supporting the dox  and placing at risk the forum treasurer and the boards funds.
3. it appears that he may be stealing btc from his campaign projects

should not be asked QUESTIONS based on observable instances?  Observable instances you are saying are clearly incorrect but NOBODY tried to refute or deny took place? Instances that several senior members believe are dishonest and shady and some that are undeniable evidence of lying and scamming?

The person asking the questions is "dishonest" LOL

How can this poor confused dumb piece of ass feltching dirt be a merit source? Boot this fool off DT also.

Noob trash who didn't find out about btc until last year have no place as merit sources/dt. Who knows what you may find out about next... "The wheel" LOL . The board is surely not this hard up that we need noob trash that are also heavily retarded in positions of trust handing out merit.

I wonder where your "merit " all came from CHIPMIXER SIG SPAMMER?

Remove your sig and then we may believe you are here as a real enthusiast not just some euro skank begging for btc crumbs because you were too dumb to notice btc 9 yrs earlier LOL

I've still the hope he'll find something useful to do instead of harassing forum members...

---

What's so hard to understand? Please read my feedback again:

Because your question implies he would be involved. You know how to phrase things that people get a wrong impression of the situation although you didn't make a statement.

And please, lern how to quote. While reading your post I feel like I'm in shitposting wonderland.

---

Maybe that would be better. Let's see if you are right and I should just ignore him or if he's interested to stop his net negative posts.

Notice how they run when you ask for proof?  LOL

Same for 1miau who is not fit to be a merit source nor fit to lick our boots.

Both vanish when you ask from some PROOF of their false claims.

@1miau

You should try this :



it's so quiet here.

Present the LIES you slobbering imbecile. You need PROOF not just you "claim" I am lying.

1miau is a "NOTHING BURGER" he is a non achieving piece of dirt like you. BRING your own largest achievement here or 1miau so we can compare it to something a TRUE legend has done here and laugh at you both.

1maui or whatever his shit stain trust abusing name is.. is  NOT FIT TO BE A MERIT SOURCE. Like yourself he has observable issues differentiating between Observable instances and lies. How can such a fool be ready to be a merit source. Likely because you are both retarded euro trash feltching dregs.

What you likely mean in 1miau has licked more ass and feltched more dirt than most people do in several life times if they are unlucky. The idiot is pure brown nosing dirt.

ANOTHER --CHIPMIXER SIG SPAMMER - WHAT A SHOCK.  Simply here to spam for his btc dust - that is all. Take it's sig away and see how  it vanishes.

All i Read everytime from you is "  Blah Blah Blah ..............  Blah Blah Blah ........... Blub   "

As i have written in my earlyer Post , come up with something Constructive for the Forum , apply for an Merit Source yourself , and dont Cry everytime like a Baby !

You write everytime lies about others because you dont get something working for yourself and all others are the Reason for it .

Again , Show us your awesome SKILLZ , oh wait thats the problem , there are nothing .

In contrast to you, 1miau has done more for the forum and for many members in a year than you have in the whole past since you came here!

Cheers Cryptohunter you made it again on my Ignore.

I fully support 1miau's application as a merit source.
Always enjoyed reading his posts, they are really great quality indeed. Some of their posts are really helpful and by seeing the content in OP, it makes no doubt that 1miau has been very involved with the community.
I trust 1miau's judgement when it comes to give merits and I think the job will be nicely done.  
It is important to have responsible people as merit sources.

The fact that 1miau is active on some local boards is great too, because he will help to spread those merits to people that aren't particularly familiar with english.

Keep up the great work 1miau.