1xBit campaign is starting again. - page 4.

SmokerFace

sr. member

Activity: 958

Merit: 265

Quote from: Beparanf on October 29, 2021, 04:03:40 AM

Yeah, many of the applicants are bought account and probably has one owner. By the nature of this campaign, You can have ROI on purchasing account when you join on 1xbit and earn a 2 weeks of salary there. I know a website that selling Bitcointalk account in bulk including higher rank member with positive trust.

Maybe we can tag high rank user that recently just active for the purpose of participating on this campaign.

Link to the website please, This is purely for peaceful purposes, I mean no harm.

Beparanf

hero member

Activity: 2744

Merit: 761

Burpaaa

Quote from: FatFork on October 29, 2021, 03:49:56 AM

Quote from: Poker Player on October 29, 2021, 02:50:49 AM

Look at this, lol:

I have already exposed multiple cases of alt accounts participating in 1xbit campaigns ^{[1, 2, 3]}, so this is not surprising. Moreover, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that these accounts are all controlled by only a few people, possibly even 1xbit himself.

One of the things that is interesting about 1xbit campaigns is that they are all funded from Binance addresses and most of the money ends up at coins.ph addresses.

Yeah, many of the applicants are bought account and probably has one owner. By the nature of this campaign, You can have ROI on purchasing account when you join on 1xbit and earn a 2 weeks of salary there. I know a website that selling Bitcointalk account in bulk including higher rank member with positive trust.

Maybe we can tag high rank user that recently just active for the purpose of participating on this campaign.

FatFork

legendary

Activity: 1624

Merit: 2594

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: Poker Player on October 29, 2021, 02:50:49 AM

Look at this, lol:

I have already exposed multiple cases of alt accounts participating in 1xbit campaigns ^{[1, 2, 3]}, so this is not surprising. Moreover, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that these accounts are all controlled by only a few people, possibly even 1xbit himself.

One of the things that is interesting about 1xbit campaigns is that they are all funded from Binance addresses and most of the money ends up at coins.ph addresses.

Poker Player

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 2017

Look at this, lol:

aioc

hero member

Activity: 2926

Merit: 567

1XBIT should be good if instead of paying these bounty hunters they should just fix or solve their issues regarding nonpayment and banning accounts with winnings their reputation grade will go up but instead, they included their participants to get tagged, after this campaign these participants should not beg those who tagged them for participating.

2double0

legendary

Activity: 2618

Merit: 1105

Quote from: dkbit98 on October 28, 2021, 05:20:00 AM

Do we really need to have one more topic about 1xBit campaign?
There is already one or more created by JollyGood so in this way it looks to me that we are only giving them more free advertisement.
As the saying goes - there is no such thing as bad publicity.

I agree. 1xbit is given unnecessary attention every time a member tries to talk about them. There is no bad publicity, but an open proclamation will help the bad guys to gain exposure. But this proclamation is also giving newbies and investors, various insights of how this site had been the reason why major accounts also got tagged as 1xbit's reputation helped ruin those accounts that participated in their campaign due to the dirt that has mudded them.

logfiles

copper member

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1693

Top Crypto Casino

Listed accounts wearing the scam casino's signatures tagged. If there's any that hasn't received a tag, Just alert us in this thread.

UmerIdrees

hero member

Activity: 2226

Merit: 834

Quote from: GowithMi_GMAT on October 26, 2021, 08:03:10 PM

Weekly payouts increased from before, of course allowing many new apps or participants register on the 1xBit campaign!

Weekly payouts are decreased and not increased.

Quote from: ScamViruS on October 27, 2021, 03:06:00 PM

So those who will join 1xbit's signature campaign need to be tagged until they resolve all the complaints.

This is not going to happen. 1xbit claims that they are back in bitcointalk after they have cleared all the issues or are looking to be not-a-scam-campaign but fact is otherwise. Every now and then i see un-resolved accusations against them and they don't show any concern to resolve them.

lovesmayfamilis

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 4265

✿♥‿♥✿

You forget that several accounts can belong to one person. See how many sleeping accounts wake up at the same time when any interesting company appears in their opinion. How do they know about the appearance of the announcement? Surely here on the forum, some people have several alternative accounts that can resent with us about the unfairness of participating in a fraudulent project, and at the same time, in parallel with another account, participate in this signature.
Well, with the participation of several accounts, a not so deplorable amount will come out, especially when we talk about countries with low earnings.

Pmalek

legendary

Activity: 2730

Merit: 7065

Quote from: LoyceV on October 28, 2021, 04:05:27 AM

It's always nice to put this into perspective: there are many countries in which the average income is (much) less than $100 per week.

Per week? Try per month. That source you linked to shows the average income per month. The people living in the bottom ten African countries on the list earn from $38 - $92/month. Getting into a campaign like this crappy one is like winning the lottery for them.

Unfortunately nothing can be done besides tagging the participants. And they don't care. I doubt theymos will interfere unless the campaign goes on a spamming spree. By the looks ok if, that won't be the case.

NeuroticFish

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 6382

Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!

Quote from: mindrust on October 28, 2021, 05:28:39 AM

Those who have effed accounts should pile in here. Free money.

Actually that's not possible, unless the red is strictly because of their campaign. I guess that you've missed this post.

mindrust

legendary

Activity: 3276

Merit: 2442

$100/week is pretty good money if you already have a fucked up account. Otherwise it is not worth getting your account ruined because you won't be able to join other "legit" campaigns in the future.

Those who have effed accounts should pile in here. Free money.

This campaign is just like real life. You can make good money by providing CP or selling drugs but if you get caught, you'll rot in a jail cell while most legit common jobs won't make shit.

dkbit98

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 7064

Do we really need to have one more topic about 1xBit campaign?
There is already one or more created by JollyGood so in this way it looks to me that we are only giving them more free advertisement.
As the saying goes - there is no such thing as bad publicity.

NeuroticFish

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 6382

Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on October 27, 2021, 05:31:36 PM

$100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.

If you compare with the current "market" for signature campaigns, you'll see that many offer less than that, fixed, per week: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/overview-of-bitcointalk-signature-ad-campaigns-last-update-01-jan-23-615953
Then, as said, "low" depends (too) much on the user's home country.

But I do agree, however: it is "damn low" Grin

if you take into account that you'll ruin a not-bad-at-all account's future for 100$/week in a campaign that surely won't be here for ever (i.e. long enough).
And I'll come back to my original "hunch": it also depends on how much these accounts costed, since I am not convinced that it's the original owners who apply there.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on October 27, 2021, 05:31:36 PM

$100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.

It's always nice to put this into perspective: there are many countries in which the average income is (much) less than $100 per week.

BitcoinGirl.Club

legendary

Activity: 2800

Merit: 2736

Farewell LEO: o_e_l_e_o

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on October 27, 2021, 05:31:36 PM

$100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.

Make it 4 weeks and it becomes $400 a week. Spam the forum with shitpost, and $400 is easy. It seems low to you since you are in a campaign which is paying up to $300 a week but when the forum average signature campaigns are paying even $50 a week, $100 a week seems very decent to me.

Quote from: LTU_btc on October 27, 2021, 06:46:40 PM

Why it's not good practice? Red tag will stop them from joining other campaigns in future and maybe they will think twice before starting to promote 1xbit.

Feedback positive and negative are only good use case when you are doing a trade with other party. It used to be leaving feedback for anything even for a statement you do not like but since theymos added flag system and updated the concept of new feedback system back two years ago (more or less) the perception has changed.

2double0

legendary

Activity: 2618

Merit: 1105

Quote from: LTU_btc on October 27, 2021, 06:46:40 PM

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on October 27, 2021, 01:47:15 PM

It's now like a game. 1xBit will come around, offer the shit posters a good amount of money, they will wear their signature and start trolling around. In the current Feedback system I don't think giving red tag is a good practice, but surely we all can leave neutral and alert good projects not to hire them.

Why it's not good practice? Red tag will stop them from joining other campaigns in future and maybe they will think twice before starting to promote 1xbit.

If given a negative feedback to them, sure it will stop them from participating in future signature campaigns (some campaigns allow negative feedback users so far) but how and why will the need for them thinking twice will arise when they will not be left capable of promoting any projects later? I agree with Bitcoingirl on a very slight part of giving neutral because there are 'or may be' some good users who will be left a red tag and will have their account's future opportunities seized from them. I would give a negative to the members who took part again in their new campaign but not the newer ones, I will give them one last chance with a neutral. Though, if 1xbit's signature is not needed on the forum, I think admins should step in like they did in yobit's matter and banned them from advertising here.

LTU_btc

legendary

Activity: 3080

Merit: 1338

Slava Ukraini!

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on October 27, 2021, 05:31:36 PM

One other thing that's striking is how low the rates are for sig campaigns these days (at least if 1xbit's campaign is typical). I guess the days of being able to earn 0.XXXXBTC/post are over, and payment is pegged to USD--and it's a small amount of $ even for Legendary members. $100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.

For Chipmixer member, I agree, it's low rates Cheesy

. But in general, $100 for Legendary isn't bad. In average, most campaigns paying somewhere between $50-$80 for Legendary. Yeah, there is one campaign offering $130, while another giving just $20/week for Legendary.
On the other hand, $100 for 1xbit participants isn't something special, considering ruining their reputation and that they won't be able to join other campaigns in future.
But agree, it was good times for participants when payment rates where fixed in BTC without converting it to USD value.

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on October 27, 2021, 01:47:15 PM

It's now like a game. 1xBit will come around, offer the shit posters a good amount of money, they will wear their signature and start trolling around. In the current Feedback system I don't think giving red tag is a good practice, but surely we all can leave neutral and alert good projects not to hire them.

Why it's not good practice? Red tag will stop them from joining other campaigns in future and maybe they will think twice before starting to promote 1xbit.

2double0

legendary

Activity: 2618

Merit: 1105

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on October 27, 2021, 05:31:36 PM

Quote from: NeuroticFish on October 27, 2021, 06:23:59 AM

Pretty sad. I see very old accounts too. Hacked/sold? Possibly.

Maybe, but I didn't see many Legendary accounts applying. I did see that SmokerFace applied, even though he has negative trust that has nothing to do with being associated with the 1xbit campaign (one of the campaign's exceptions to the no-negative trust rule). Ugh.

Hands changed of that account pretty much before it applied for betking? So when already given a negative, who cares! He deletes and reposts to save his time, man! He is a billionaire and can't just go on posting like that here forever! (sarcasm)

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on October 27, 2021, 05:31:36 PM

It's unbelievable to see so many members applying, even though they've got to know that they're going to get negged all to hell because of it. They might get accepted to the 1xbit campaign, but good luck to them trying to join another one once it ends.

Money can buy happiness, here it can buy 1xbit some users who don't care about their profiles but those rates. Points out that many of them being cheaters and if they manage to enroll more than 3 or 5 accounts in that campaign, even those low rates will get them their yearly expenditure worth money (depens on their belonging country).

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on October 27, 2021, 05:31:36 PM

$100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.

Uhmm, those were the days when BTC0.00075 were being paid per post, missing them? kidding Grin

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3332

Merit: 6809

Cashback 15%

Quote from: NeuroticFish on October 27, 2021, 06:23:59 AM

Pretty sad. I see very old accounts too. Hacked/sold? Possibly.

Maybe, but I didn't see many Legendary accounts applying. I did see that SmokerFace applied, even though he has negative trust that has nothing to do with being associated with the 1xbit campaign (one of the campaign's exceptions to the no-negative trust rule). Ugh.

It's unbelievable to see so many members applying, even though they've got to know that they're going to get negged all to hell because of it. They might get accepted to the 1xbit campaign, but good luck to them trying to join another one once it ends.

One other thing that's striking is how low the rates are for sig campaigns these days (at least if 1xbit's campaign is typical). I guess the days of being able to earn 0.XXXXBTC/post are over, and payment is pegged to USD--and it's a small amount of $ even for Legendary members. $100/week is pretty damn low if you ask me.

Topic: 1xBit campaign is starting again. - page 4. (Read 1372 times)