They are not the one personally buying it but rather those participants that want to get profit by sacrificing the trust score of the account that they purchased in exchange for the weekly payment for signature campaign.
There’s nothing for them to gain on buying account themselves and do posting one by one while they can just paid participants by regular rate for the campaign.
I disagree. Some of their accounts were definitely bought by them and given to their employees who would advertise for them in return for salaries on a regular basis and there's a good amount of evidence to prove that.There’s nothing for them to gain on buying account themselves and do posting one by one while they can just paid participants by regular rate for the campaign.
1xbit have the resources to execute such elaborate plans though they clearly failed pretty badly within this forum.
If you check the opening thread of 1xbit, you will understand that offered upto $30 for member rank while legendary rank was seeing upto $150. This was huge to the extent that people sacrificed their accounts for the token.
This is exactly my point on my above opinion. It will cost them double or triple the amount by buying a Bitcointalk then join to their campaign while they are paying their employee at the same time to do the posting job instead of hiring someone here in the forum that willing to sacrifice the account for the pay.
Most of the previous participants is still active when the campaign was close and some of them joined on Stake.com. Although there’s a basis that most of their participants is bought account but not to the point which 1xbit do it by themselves why they can pay the weekly rate easily.
.
