Topic: 1xbit.com signature campaign (over) - page 7. (Read 11935 times)

thanks for this week payment, keep strong 1xBit

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/ca987bd036083c5c861d485b0e96ee8a7d79651c8bbce4e9eab1a4f5650743bc

So many of those that have been red tagged by multiple members are asking to get paid $140 per week for displaying and promoting the 1xbit scammers website. The irony is the signature campaign participants cannot even see it but it serves them right for shaking hands with scammers AND it serves the 1xbit scammers right because they invited and accepted sock-puppet and alt-account shills to their scam 

I also haven't seen this comment after week 6  


Can we have information in the form of a post in this thread about any changes in rules or updates?

---

I send already 3 private messages about wrong calculation in week 3. Could you review it and answer please?

This note was not there at the end of the 6th week. / Edit: At least I didn't see that. I don't know when this note was added there.

Well, it was written in the spreadsheet no need to make all posts in 1-2 days in your case.

Week 6 - "need not make all post 1-2 day" username: Naficopa
Week 7 - "need not make all post 1-2 day" username: Naficopa

This is not business but did you check the spreadsheet at the end of the 6th Week prior to payment? If yes then did you learn from it? If no then did the campaign manager edited the spreadsheet for week 6 and week 7 in your case?

Hello,

I noticed that the spreadsheet is being updated.

Do the notes next to amounts mean another rule change backwards with no announcement and we don't get payment again?

I understand that this may happen once, but rule changes are made in advance, not backwards!

That doesn't make sense. You were hoping for a position, but you didn't check if you were accepted?
But then, you decided to delete your application and write an apology after finding out you weren't accepted. It was a calculated risk, wasn't it? 

An honest mistake from my side, I didn't read anything on this thread and just hoped for a position that I never really checked if I'm accepted or not.

I've sent a PM sir JollyGood, I hope you can read it. 

Those that do not value their reputation or trust will try to receive money for wearing the signature from the 1xbit scammers.

I will start tagging soon and hope others will follow. A big thank you to those that have already tagged them....

Btctalk name: Tamim121
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/tamim121-1217533
Rank: Member
Current post count: 1177
BTC Address: 13TUk6oo7EZKq3ebd4vCHvD7SXWhc1Uveo

"Yep, greedy members of the forum, please come on in and advertise our already fucked up casino so that your neutral or good trust gets soiled just like those who have already tried to advertise us"

Anybody who values their trust would be out of their mind if they decided to wear your signature.

Who would make them have a neg trust/s?
Your campaign. 

if not met required post you post wrong part or post was bad so not count it. can send to me pm for review!

yes we have open position but looking too people with good and neutral trust not negative!

I have similar situation in week 3.
It's clear from the statistics and my posts history that I wrote 16 posts in week 3 (07.06 - 13.06), but only 14 were counted in the spreadsheet. Also check again please or at least tell the reason for these difference. Maybe there are some threads or sections where posts don't count?

Did I write anything about 1xbit? I have to stand on the side of what? Side of my opinion about the fact that if competition speaks negatively, this is a kind of conflict?
Honest competition, of course, that is very much needed for the entire market (every market). However, the competition speaking negatively, in my opinion, is not fair and for sure can not be objective.

Not true. People don’t speak negatively about other competing casinos. Why do only scammers have this problem?
Healthy competition is good for business. Fraudulent behavior and bad publicity is bad for the entire industry.

Looking objectively to this situation, people working for competition 1xbit should stay on side. That would be the most fair.

Although I've never studied debate, I recognize this as a classic logical fallacy. Instead of responding with a well-reasoned, to-the-point counterargument (such as concrete examples or genuine evidence against my claims), you try to undermine my argument by saying "See, he wears the signature of another gambling site, so he must be trying to talk down the competition!" As a matter of fact, I made a much more nuanced argument, but you chose to ignore it completely and constructed a vague straw man fallacy instead.

Furthermore, you challenge me for something I've never said. In your statement, you said, "I challenge you and others calling 1xbit and all the other so-called scam platforms ..." , which is totally untrue. Throughout all of my posts, you won't find a single post in which I explicitly stated that 1xBIT casino is a scam, as opposed to some of the members I quoted here, who were later paid by 1xBIT as their promoters.

Now, for your second claim, can you show me at least one member from the list I posted who was unjustly tagged?
Considering the evidence I presented (consolidation of received payments to a single address), I believe it to be quite evident that these accounts belong to one person or a small group of people. As you may know, multiple accounts are not against the rules of this forum, but cheating in contests and signature campaigns by using alt accounts is fraudulent and deceptive practice, and deserves to be tagged as such, don't you think?

Given the above, would you accept the reviews and opinions of such members as honest?
However, 1xBIT decided to hire them and paid them to promote their business. Go figure.

It's not a drama-but it's a true story-which is played by the 1xbit site, not a few people are victimized by the greed of the 1xbit team.

I think the member who hides behind their main account can be called that person is a loser.

I see-not a broken DT system, the actions of the 1xbit team that broke this forum, if I become an admin-I guarantee 1xbit site, I will drown in the eyes of this community forever.

Doesn't matter how people understand your post, but this fragment ^ is very real.
It's quite obvious that noone speaks positively about competition.
It is not strange that those who wear advertising of competitive websites have extremely negative opinions.
Looking objectively to this situation, people working for competition should stay on side. That would be the most fair.