Pages:
Author

Topic: 2013-05-20 theRegister- Canadian regulators welcome US Bitcoin refugees... (Read 3110 times)

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1001
But we didn't restrict online poker like the US. In fact a large part of online casino are hosted in Canada and some of them are still available to american players.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahnawake_Gaming_Commission

In fact, it would be interesting to see how Bitcoin plays with the whole Native Canadian autonomy issue. Conceivably, the first jurisdiction to adopt Bitcoin could easily be a Canadian reserve.  Cheesy

Quebec here we come?

I was being somewhat facetious, but the more I think about it, given the jurisdictional history between the federal government and the first nations, it does make some sense. It's how Canada is able to host online casinos... technically, they're hosted on reserves like Khanawakhe.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
But we didn't restrict online poker like the US. In fact a large part of online casino are hosted in Canada and some of them are still available to american players.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahnawake_Gaming_Commission

In fact, it would be interesting to see how Bitcoin plays with the whole Native Canadian autonomy issue. Conceivably, the first jurisdiction to adopt Bitcoin could easily be a Canadian reserve.  Cheesy

Quebec here we come?
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1001
But we didn't restrict online poker like the US. In fact a large part of online casino are hosted in Canada and some of them are still available to american players.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahnawake_Gaming_Commission

In fact, it would be interesting to see how Bitcoin plays with the whole Native Canadian autonomy issue. Conceivably, the first jurisdiction to adopt Bitcoin could easily be a Canadian reserve.  Cheesy
vip
Activity: 756
Merit: 503
But we didn't restrict online poker like the US. In fact a large part of online casino are hosted in Canada and some of them are still available to american players.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahnawake_Gaming_Commission
sr. member
Activity: 358
Merit: 250
Canada might well be a great place to do business, but anyone considering operating an exchange there should make no mistake:

When the DHS or NSA says "jump!", INSET (Canada's equivalent of the US DHS) says "how high?". Unfortunate but true in post 9/11 Canada.

Reportedly, they have a habit of pulling up unannounced in unmarked Crown Vics, in dark suits with conspicuous shoulder holsters, to do the bidding of various US agencies. Not generally too concerned with the formalities of obtaining warrants in advance, they've been reported on more than one occasion to just say "we have an ERT on standby" or "we have direct orders from Ottawa" when asked. Compliance with their requests usually follows.

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1001
Honestly though, I've maybe heard of 1 instance of "eh". I've never heard of "aboot". Been living in Vancouver for 8 years now, we just speak just like Americans but more polite.

The closer to the US border you are, the more americanized people tend to be, and the less the Canadian accent. 
Listen to the hosers in northern Alberta or Saskatchewan talk, and it gets pretty bad. 


And about 90 percent of Canadians live within 100 miles of the US border... I say we start pushing the border south  Grin
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Honestly though, I've maybe heard of 1 instance of "eh". I've never heard of "aboot". Been living in Vancouver for 8 years now, we just speak just like Americans but more polite.

The closer to the US border you are, the more americanized people tend to be, and the less the Canadian accent. 
Listen to the hosers in northern Alberta or Saskatchewan talk, and it gets pretty bad. 
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
Guess what, we already have an exchange run by a big corporation, and unlikely to be shutdown by authorities anytime soon. http://wmeng.exchanger.ru/asp/wmlist.asp
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Honestly though, I've maybe heard of 1 instance of "eh". I've never heard of "aboot". Been living in Vancouver for 8 years now, we just speak just like Americans but more polite.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10

You could be surprised at how much there is resistance against USA policy. Honestly, your country is pretty bad at making good social policies and you are usually the inspiration of "what should NOT be done".

Somebody has to set the bar.

You're welcome.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002
Bank can accept or refuse whatever client they want and don't have to justify themselves.
BTW, in the EU recently was passed law explicitly prohibiting this practice.
hero member
Activity: 632
Merit: 500
All I got was the 1/4 French at the end "do you understand?" 

I'm 1/2 French Canadian

New-Brunswick? Ontario? I can't translate the rest of the sentence, it's high-end profanity and there's no real equivalent in english. You have things like "holy fucking shit", but it's way too tame  Grin Check the wikipedia link from aigeezer.

Some maudit anglais might look it up in Wiki though: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_French_profanity       Wink

Two solitudes.          Sad

Hahaha, we could talk a long way about that. It's strange how Canada feels so alien to me sometimes and how I don't belong to that country. It's sad because canadians are really awesome people and that sort of political confusion really make things weird sometimes.  Sad
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
Quote
The letter said: "Your entity is not, at this time, engaged as a money services business in Canada as per the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing and its associated Regulations.

"In fact, your entity doesn’t provide the services of remitting and/or transferring funds for the sake of the service. The transfer of funds is simply a corollary of your actual service of buying and selling virtual currency. Therefore, you do not have to register your entity with us."

This is how I interpretted it originally ... basically bitcoin exchanges facilitate the buying/selling of virtual currency ... much like a commodity exchange ... if people want to use those assets to transfer value that is a corollary (and not something the exchange has any control over). Basically, the laws surrounding "lawful money" do not apply to virtual currencies.

That whole FinCen 'guideline' sounds like a hand-wavy fix-up because they just wanted to back fit a prosecution on to Gox's Dwolla account.

The FINTRAC position is essentially the same as that of the US regulator FinCen. The key difference is that the Canadian exchanges are limiting themselves to the trading of BTC for fiat while MTGox is not.  Take a look at this from https://mtgox.com/terms_of_service:

Quote
PLATFORM TRANSACTION PROCESS FOR BITCOIN TRANSFER TRANSACTIONS

Members may at any time transfer any amount of Bitcoins to any other Members as well as any other Bitcoin users even if they are not Members (the “Transferee”).

Bitcoin Transfer Transactions may be initiated at any time from the following page: https://mtgox.com/index.html. Transferees shall be identified by their bitcoin address.

Members shall be solely responsible for ensuring that any transfer of Bitcoins to a Transferee shall be a valid and legal transaction not infringing any laws including money-laundering laws and regulations.

Mt. Gox’s responsibility shall be limited to using reasonable technical efforts to ensure the receipt of the Bitcoins transferred. When conducting Bitcoin Transfer Transactions with a Bitcoin user who is not a Member, Mt. Gox’s responsibility shall be further limited to ensuring the transfer of the necessary technical data to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network.

No Commission of any kind will be charged by Mt. Gox for Bitcoin Transfer Transactions.

PLATFORM TRANSACTION PROCESS FOR CURRENCY TRANSFER TRANSACTIONS

Members may at any time transfer any amount of currencies held on their Account to any other Members (the “Transferee”). Transfers to third parties who are not Members is not possible.

Currency Transfer Transactions may be initiated at any time from the following page: https://mtgox.com/index.html. Transferees shall be identified by their Account name.

Members shall be solely responsible for ensuring that any transfer of currencies to a Transferee shall be a valid and legal transaction not infringing any laws including money-laundering laws and regulations.

Mt. Gox’s responsibility shall be limited to using reasonable technical efforts to ensure the receipt of the currencies transferred.

No Commission of any kind will be charged by Mt. Gox for Currency Transfer Transactions, except when the Account of the Transferee is set up in a currency different than the currency transferred (in which case the 2.5% Commission shall automatically apply).

If this is not a red flag in front of the US regulators and clearly indicates a money transfer business as opposed to an exchange business,  I do not know what is. If a Canadian Bitcoin exchange tried that same I would not be surprised if the Canadian regulators were all over them also.  The issue here is not that there is a material difference between United States and Canadian regulations in this case, there infact is not, but rather than the Canadian Bitcoin exchanges are not also engaging in the transfer of money, like PayPal, e-gold etc on the side.
legendary
Activity: 1450
Merit: 1013
Cryptanalyst castrated by his government, 1952
Osti de caliss de saint sacrament c'est pas chinoix criss de tabarnak.

Some maudit anglais might look it up in Wiki though: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_French_profanity       Wink

Two solitudes.          Sad
vip
Activity: 756
Merit: 503
Osti de caliss de saint sacrament c'est pas chinoix criss de tabarnak.
hero member
Activity: 557
Merit: 500
All I got was the 1/4 French at the end "do you understand?" 

I'm 1/2 French Canadian
hero member
Activity: 632
Merit: 500
Unless you're in Quebec region, then it's all Greek to me.

Tabarnak d'esti de calisse, kossé tu comprends pas?

(Good luck with Google Translate  Grin)
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
Quote
The letter said: "Your entity is not, at this time, engaged as a money services business in Canada as per the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing and its associated Regulations.

"In fact, your entity doesn’t provide the services of remitting and/or transferring funds for the sake of the service. The transfer of funds is simply a corollary of your actual service of buying and selling virtual currency. Therefore, you do not have to register your entity with us."

This is how I interpretted it originally ... basically bitcoin exchanges facilitate the buying/selling of virtual currency ... much like a commodity exchange ... if people want to use those assets to transfer value that is a corollary (and not something the exchange has any control over). Basically, the laws surrounding "lawful money" do not apply to virtual currencies.

That whole FinCen 'guideline' sounds like a hand-wavy fix-up because they just wanted to back fit a prosecution on to Gox's Dwolla account.
hero member
Activity: 557
Merit: 500
Time to learn how to speak Canadian?

Not too hard -

English: about.  Canadian: aboot.
English: house.  Canadian: hoose.

Unless you're in Quebec region, then it's all Greek to me.


Edit: Go Canada!
hero member
Activity: 632
Merit: 500
This is awesome!  Grin

I think most of the time the US don't get pressured by Canadian policy. It's mostly the other way. If the US don't like Bitcoin they will pressure Canada to follow their policy.

You could be surprised at how much there is resistance against USA policy. Honestly, your country is pretty bad at making good social policies and you are usually the inspiration of "what should NOT be done".
Pages:
Jump to: