2013-07-01 WSJ - Winklevoss Twins File to Launch Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Product

21stcenturymoney

newbie

Activity: 52

Merit: 0

Quote from: kjlimo on July 02, 2013, 12:03:33 AM

What will be the smallest number of shares one can buy?

1? Or 100? More?

Usually 1, but if you buy less then 100 you have to pay a odd lot fee.

Quote from: J.Jade on July 02, 2013, 06:24:08 AM

I never understood what's the advantage of buying shares in a trust over buying the underlying commodity itself.

Well i'm just a private individual not a VC though.

Liquidity, storage, dealing with delivery.

21stcenturymoney

newbie

Activity: 52

Merit: 0

Quote from: DeathAndTaxes on July 01, 2013, 11:01:13 PM

Quote from: Foxpup on July 01, 2013, 10:35:47 PM

Quote from: CurbsideProphet on July 01, 2013, 09:59:28 PM

The interesting thing is the filing keeps referring to their holdings as "math-based assets." I'm wondering if this leaves room for alt currencies.

Actually, the filing never refers to their holdings as just "math-based assets", it specifically refers to their holdings as "Bitcoins", defined as "a type of a Digital Math-Based Asset". The filing does refer to altcoins as examples of alternative Digital Math-Based Assets and Bitcoin's competion, though the Trust does not deal in anything other than bitcoins specifically.

Exactly. Even if there was demand for a ETF for an alternative CC it wouldn't make sense for a single ETF and single trust to handle both. I mean there are Physical Gold ETFs and Physical Silver ETFs but you don't see mixed Silver & Gold ETFs. Ticker symbols are cheap and there are thousands of ETFs. If the first one gets approved and there is demand no reason you couldn't have a whole family of CC based ETFs.

http://www.invescopowershares.com/products/overview.aspx?ticker=DBP

I am sure there are others. Though most ETFs do not have an asset manager so I guess if they wanted to creat a mixed fund they would have to define a mix pegged to either value in a fiat currency, or to one of the other currencies to maintain.

vokain

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1019

Quote from: overc on July 11, 2013, 08:25:47 PM

Quote from: n8rwJeTt8TrrLKPa55eU on July 02, 2013, 03:01:26 PM

As a politician, you don't wanna be the guy that torpedos an asset that's held in a bunch of people's retirement brokerage accounts.

+100,000BTC !
That is the best point in the protection of BTC from some of stupid government decisions which I have ever heard!

who cares if you flee the country with bitcoins (REAL bitcoins mind you, we're not about that paper-cert life) bought with ill-gotten gains :p

overc

sr. member

Activity: 263

Merit: 250

Quote from: n8rwJeTt8TrrLKPa55eU on July 02, 2013, 03:01:26 PM

As a politician, you don't wanna be the guy that torpedos an asset that's held in a bunch of people's retirement brokerage accounts.

+100,000BTC !
That is the best point in the protection of BTC from some of stupid government decisions which I have ever heard!

n8rwJeTt8TrrLKPa55eU

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

I recommend looking at the chart of gold after 2004 or silver after 2006 in order to understand the impact of ease-of-purchase and institutional money flowing into an asset that was formerly cumbersome to buy.

Basically if this thing gets approved (and I see no reason for it not to be), there will likely be another large parabolic rise.

Not to mention that I have never seen so much coverage across so many news outlets for Bitcoin as what has happened though this news. We should all be grateful to these guys.

The more people that own BTC (even if indirectly through an ETF), the more difficult it will be for governments to attempt to pull the plug. As a politician, you don't wanna be the guy that torpedos an asset that's held in a bunch of people's retirement brokerage accounts.

Scott J

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1000

Thank you

aigeezer

legendary

Activity: 1450

Merit: 1013

Cryptanalyst castrated by his government, 1952

Quote from: aigeezer on July 02, 2013, 01:28:23 PM

Quote from: Scott J on July 02, 2013, 01:25:43 PM

Quote from: btceic on July 02, 2013, 01:20:56 PM

Quote from: bitster on July 02, 2013, 01:17:36 PM

There is a poll today on yahoo finance about this most of the choices as well as the votes are negative tho. Angry

~~link?~~ found it

link?

"Beware of Bitcoin ETF" they say in that subtle way they have.

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/breakout/winklevosses-trying-bring-bitcoin-mainstream-investors-171834667.html

Edit: Sorry, that was one story among many from Yahoo. Correct link for the poll: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/winklevoss-twins-plan-first-fund-005347631.html

aigeezer

legendary

Activity: 1450

Merit: 1013

Cryptanalyst castrated by his government, 1952

Quote from: Scott J on July 02, 2013, 01:25:43 PM

Quote from: btceic on July 02, 2013, 01:20:56 PM

Quote from: bitster on July 02, 2013, 01:17:36 PM

There is a poll today on yahoo finance about this most of the choices as well as the votes are negative tho. Angry

~~link?~~ found it

link?

"Beware of Bitcoin ETF" they say in that subtle way they have.

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/breakout/winklevosses-trying-bring-bitcoin-mainstream-investors-171834667.html

Scott J

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1000

Quote from: btceic on July 02, 2013, 01:20:56 PM

Quote from: bitster on July 02, 2013, 01:17:36 PM

There is a poll today on yahoo finance about this most of the choices as well as the votes are negative tho. Angry

~~link?~~ found it

link?

btceic

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

♫ A wave came crashing like a fist to the jaw ♫

Quote from: bitster on July 02, 2013, 01:17:36 PM

There is a poll today on yahoo finance about this most of the choices as well as the votes are negative tho. Angry

~~link?~~ found it

bitster

newbie

Activity: 53

Merit: 0

There is a poll today on yahoo finance about this most of the choices as well as the votes are negative tho. Angry

willphase

hero member

Activity: 767

Merit: 500

Quote from: Foxpup on July 02, 2013, 06:19:39 AM

Quote from: willphase on July 02, 2013, 04:20:55 AM

the winkelvii aren't trading bitcoin here, they are just offering shares in their company that holds bitcoin.

If they have 1% of all bitcoins, that's 100,000 BTC which is approximately 100M USD - so this is the valuation of their 'company'. They are offering stock in approximately 20M USD and so you will own part of the company whose valuation will float on the price of bitcoin. They will keep 80% of the company and sell stock up to 20%.

There is nothing new in what they are doing here - just offering stock in a company. All the winkelvii are doing is spreading their risk - they aren't selling bitcoins or trading bitcoins from fiat. This doesn't seem that much of a big deal to me other than the media attention this will garner.

Will

No, that's not what they're doing at all. It is not a company and in no way resembles a company. It is a trust that holds bitcoins and issues shares that represent a claim of ownership on those bitcoins and can be redeemed for those bitcoins by any trustor at any time

Thanks for the info. I stand corrected.

Will

P_Shep

legendary

Activity: 1795

Merit: 1208

This is not OK.

Quote from: btceic on July 02, 2013, 06:48:33 AM

This story is spreading, now on bloomberg tv headlines.

More importantly, those teeth look ridiculous.

Rygon

hero member

Activity: 520

Merit: 500

I didn't read the filing, but I hope they publish the public key where the holdings will be stored. Instant audit.

J.Jade

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: Foxpup on July 02, 2013, 06:43:50 AM

Quote from: J.Jade on July 02, 2013, 06:24:08 AM

I never understood what's the advantage of buying shares in a trust over buying the underlying commodity itself.

Well i'm just a private individual not a VC though.

I'm also just a private individual. That's why I don't have a massive, impenetrable vault in my basement for storing my gold, instead I just buy gold ETFs. Similarly, although I have the technical experience to safely store my bitcoins, most people do not. These people will certainly not buy actual bitcoins, but they may be willing to invest in a bitcoin ETF where they don't have to worry about that. That's the advantage.

However this advantage comes with the added risk of not directly controlling the commodity and having to trust the ETF entity so I doubt it is a true advantage.
Neither gold or bitcoins need much storage space. And in case you own considerable amounts you can also afford extra security.

btceic

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

♫ A wave came crashing like a fist to the jaw ♫

This story is spreading, now on bloomberg tv headlines.

Foxpup

legendary

Activity: 4542

Merit: 3393

Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023

Quote from: J.Jade on July 02, 2013, 06:24:08 AM

I never understood what's the advantage of buying shares in a trust over buying the underlying commodity itself.

Well i'm just a private individual not a VC though.

I'm also just a private individual. That's why I don't have a massive, impenetrable vault in my basement for storing my gold, instead I just buy gold ETFs. Similarly, although I have the technical experience to safely store my bitcoins, most people do not. These people will certainly not buy actual bitcoins, but they may be willing to invest in a bitcoin ETF where they don't have to worry about that. That's the advantage.

kiko

sr. member

Activity: 453

Merit: 250

Some twitter snark picked up from the comments at Hacker News:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5973971

Quote

Favorite snarky tweets in my feed...

"Bitcoin ETF" is an anagram of "Fiction Bet" which seems pretty apt.. https://twitter.com/LorcanRK/status/351840221773578241
Bitcoin ETF ticker ideas: $DCHE $LOSS $ZERO $SCAM (via @jamesvonsimson - his idea: $SCKR) https://twitter.com/finansakrobat/status/351837836724551682
Well, at least the Winkelvii Bitcoin trust is consistent with their practice of being parasitic on new innovation… https://twitter.com/EpicureanDeal/status/351834917593817088
The Winkelvoss Bitcoin ETF is the first of many wonderful deals brought to you by the JOBS Act (Just Open Bucket Shops). https://twitter.com/ReformedBroker/status/351830441646489601
Imagine the call "if you got burned on the Facebook IPO, why don't you take the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust for a spin?" https://twitter.com/BarbarianCap/status/351825104147189760

J.Jade

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

I never understood what's the advantage of buying shares in a trust over buying the underlying commodity itself.

Well i'm just a private individual not a VC though.

Foxpup

legendary

Activity: 4542

Merit: 3393

Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023

Quote from: willphase on July 02, 2013, 04:20:55 AM

the winkelvii aren't trading bitcoin here, they are just offering shares in their company that holds bitcoin.

If they have 1% of all bitcoins, that's 100,000 BTC which is approximately 100M USD - so this is the valuation of their 'company'. They are offering stock in approximately 20M USD and so you will own part of the company whose valuation will float on the price of bitcoin. They will keep 80% of the company and sell stock up to 20%.

There is nothing new in what they are doing here - just offering stock in a company. All the winkelvii are doing is spreading their risk - they aren't selling bitcoins or trading bitcoins from fiat. This doesn't seem that much of a big deal to me other than the media attention this will garner.

Will

No, that's not what they're doing at all. It is not a company and in no way resembles a company. It is a trust that holds bitcoins and issues shares that represent a claim of ownership on those bitcoins and can be redeemed for those bitcoins by any trustor at any time (conversely, the trust will "buy" bitcoins from trustors by issuing new shares in exchange). The basic idea is that investors will buy the shares from the trustors and then trade them on a public exchange such as NASDAQ, but no bitcoins will actually change hands until the shares are redeemed or new shares are issued (which will happen due to arbitrage if the share price deviates too far from the price of actual bitcoins). This is pretty much exactly the same way commodity ETFs are issued and traded.

EDIT: Typo

Topic: 2013-07-01 WSJ - Winklevoss Twins File to Launch Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Product (Read 5067 times)