Pages:
Author

Topic: [2013-12-11] CNN: Can Bitcoin replace PayPal? (Read 2202 times)

legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1219
December 18, 2013, 11:52:17 AM
#35
Precious metals were valuable because they are pretty and easy to form. Now they are valuable because we all think they are. The same could be true of anything else that can't be produced by just anyone.

Precious metals are valuable because their supply is limited, just like the case of Bitcoin. We just have to improve the security issue. Once we do that, we can take Bitcoin beyond gold.  Grin
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto News & Tutorials - Coinramble.com
Precious metals were valuable because they are pretty and easy to form. Now they are valuable because we all think they are. The same could be true of anything else that can't be produced by just anyone.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1219
So we go from a few people scamming a few vendors , to a few vendors scamming a lot of people Smiley.
Each system has its advantages and its disadvantages , that's why we have lots of payment processors.

The second case is much worse than the first. If we can't prevent this particular problem, then Bitcoin will never become popular with people who sue them to purchase various products online.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
I sure hope so. Fraud doesn't exist for a Bitcoin merchant.

So we go from a few people scamming a few vendors , to a few vendors scamming a lot of people Smiley.
Each system has its advantages and its disadvantages , that's why we have lots of payment processors.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
I sure hope so. Fraud doesn't exist for a Bitcoin merchant.
member
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
There is no way that bitcoins will replace paypal even though it sucks its easier to get and recieve and if there are any problems you can get your money back
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
Ask this the guy who just spent 18k$ as transaction fees for 0.5BTC

It was his own mistake. He was using a brain wallet, and by default the remaining portion of the 0.05 BTC was converted to transaction fee. This fee was divided by 400+ pool members, although a few were honest enough to give them back.

https://blockchain.info/tx/a2d1e19331f4ea274079c94382560bbb4f32165ed647a33adad651a604e7caa2

In all the time I used brainwallet.org's source, it always set the change to be sent back to my sending address, not to fee. What implementations are people using that they are fucking up their TXes so badly? It seems like I'd have to go light years out of my way to find and use them. Or are people trying to construct raw TXes without knowing WTF they're doing?
hero member
Activity: 520
Merit: 500
But you have to agree that it is a turn off for a person that has just got into bitcoins and isn't quite the geek type.
Personal opinion , but if my mother would read about this episode I bet she will not be touching bitcoins too soon , no matter how much I try to explain.

That is correct. I hope that the development team does something so that situations like these can be avoided.

What made me sad was the fact that only 4 people were honest enough (out of 400+) to transfer the coins (i.e transaction fee) back to him.

https://blockchain.info/address/1Jt35Ww1GjM9iGyTM8mAyBmCPPdPz7Z35A

We need better clients that even a 5 year old can use without screwing up too badly. It'll have to come at some expense (fees, instantaneous transactions, etc), but there is clearly a market for it. The developers should concentrate on the underlying architecture and third parties should be developing more user friendly clients.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
But you have to agree that it is a turn off for a person that has just got into bitcoins and isn't quite the geek type.
Personal opinion , but if my mother would read about this episode I bet she will not be touching bitcoins too soon , no matter how much I try to explain.

That is correct. I hope that the development team does something so that situations like these can be avoided.

What made me sad was the fact that only 4 people were honest enough (out of 400+) to transfer the coins (i.e transaction fee) back to him.

https://blockchain.info/address/1Jt35Ww1GjM9iGyTM8mAyBmCPPdPz7Z35A

1% , this is good.
I would have bet on two. The pool operator and a freak of nature.
The crypto community is not as generous as it is vocal.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1219
But you have to agree that it is a turn off for a person that has just got into bitcoins and isn't quite the geek type.
Personal opinion , but if my mother would read about this episode I bet she will not be touching bitcoins too soon , no matter how much I try to explain.

That is correct. I hope that the development team does something so that situations like these can be avoided.

What made me sad was the fact that only 4 people were honest enough (out of 400+) to transfer the coins (i.e transaction fee) back to him.

https://blockchain.info/address/1Jt35Ww1GjM9iGyTM8mAyBmCPPdPz7Z35A
member
Activity: 130
Merit: 10
I think you're assuming on-blockchain transactions with bitcoin fees - which they definitely wouldn't be doing (except for transfers in/out of the Paypal system)

Then who will use them? If they are going to charge people 4% for BTC transactions, hardly anyone would chose Paypal.

Probably the same 100-or-so million users that use them today!
(For all the same reasons)
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
The press just loves to make titles like "Can bitcoin replace -insert random word-"  Tongue
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Ask this the guy who just spent 18k$ as transaction fees for 0.5BTC

It was his own mistake. He was using a brain wallet, and by default the remaining portion of the 0.05 BTC was converted to transaction fee. This fee was divided by 400+ pool members, although a few were honest enough to give them back.

https://blockchain.info/tx/a2d1e19331f4ea274079c94382560bbb4f32165ed647a33adad651a604e7caa2

But you have to agree that it is a turn off for a person that has just got into bitcoins and isn't quite the geek type.
Personal opinion , but if my mother would read about this episode I bet she will not be touching bitcoins too soon , no matter how much I try to explain.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1219
Ask this the guy who just spent 18k$ as transaction fees for 0.5BTC

It was his own mistake. He was using a brain wallet, and by default the remaining portion of the 0.05 BTC was converted to transaction fee. This fee was divided by 400+ pool members, although a few were honest enough to give them back.

https://blockchain.info/tx/a2d1e19331f4ea274079c94382560bbb4f32165ed647a33adad651a604e7caa2
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
I don't understand why everyone thinks it's so hard to use bitcoins? And this thing: "At the moment, the Bitcoin experiment doesn't offer simplicity. It complicates matters by people having to understand another way of doing things.". When the telephone came people had to learn it to! And the same applies to the computer and the internet. It might take a while before people uses bitcoin on daily basis, but it will happen.

Ask this the guy who just spent 18k$ as transaction fees for 0.5BTC
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
I think you're assuming on-blockchain transactions with bitcoin fees - which they definitely wouldn't be doing (except for transfers in/out of the Paypal system)

Then who will use them? If they are going to charge people 4% for BTC transactions, hardly anyone would chose Paypal.

buyers will use paypal if they add services to bitcoin, like money back guaranteed and "approved" marchants, don't you think?
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1219
I think you're assuming on-blockchain transactions with bitcoin fees - which they definitely wouldn't be doing (except for transfers in/out of the Paypal system)

Then who will use them? If they are going to charge people 4% for BTC transactions, hardly anyone would chose Paypal.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1521
Paypal will integrate bitcoin if they can reduce their operating costs, or if they can make money off of it.

It can reduce the operating costs. But they will lose money out of it as well, due to the reduction of profits.

That's the main disadvantage for PayPal.  They make tons of profit off of Credit transactions and currency exchange.  If they offer BTC, there profits will be quite low assuming there are alternatives out there.
sr. member
Activity: 358
Merit: 250
Paypal will integrate bitcoin if they can reduce their operating costs, or if they can make money off of it.

It can reduce the operating costs. But they will lose money out of it as well, due to the reduction of profits.

Why would their profits be reduced?
There's very small chance that they'll have a separate fee structure for bitcoin. They already use dozens of different currencies and they all have the same fee model. Why would they treat bitcoin any differently?

I think you're assuming on-blockchain transactions with bitcoin fees - which they definitely wouldn't be doing (except for transfers in/out of the Paypal system)

Pages:
Jump to: