Topic: [2018-08-07] Bitcoin Speculators, Not Drug Dealers, Dominate Crypto Use Now (Read 295 times)

With all the regulations that are here at the moment within the crypto space, whether on ICO investments, exchanges, even on P2P trading platforms, it's no surprise that this is the case.

We have here a case where the media is always trying to portray bitcoin as some kind of underworld currency, which it really isn't. Bitcoin is used by mostly just average Joes sitting behind their laptops and transacting or investing in the currency. Sure, it does have some illegal uses, but that's with every currency - including fiat itself, issued by the government. You can't blame the currency for people's actions using it.

It's very interesting news, though. Even though this clears up a lot of the misconceptions people had about BTC, it shows another issue of over speculation on bitcoin. More adoption is definitely needed for bitcoin to be considered widely to actually be a viable global currency, and i have full belief that it's only a matter of time this happens.

I imagine this is similar with most technologies as they become more popular. They say that criminals are always the first people to adopt new technology as they see the potential in things and it was probably the case for swords, guns, cars, computers, the internet, cell phones and so on. I'm sure governments were all afraid of those things at first but you can't stop a good idea. Eventually technology catches on with the general public but of course this takes time. Not every body had a portable phone or computer overnight and initially they were only really available to the rich or business men but now pretty much everyone has one now. Bitcoin could be the same, just give it time and keep spreading the word and at least you can be one of those to say you were one of the early investors and saw the potential when nobody else did.


This is silly. People should be free to use them if they wish. Plus, there's no way you can remove things from the 'blockchain system'. I think this is one of the whole points of having a decentralized currency in the first place in that someone who doesn't like something or the powers that be can't just vote to have it removed. If you don't like them they you are free to use them but they will have their genuine uses such as when governments want to silence people or seize their assets unjustly.

This is probably more important an event than it is being reported. The acknowledgment could be an indication that the government will take a more favorable view of BTC and cryptocurrencies. When law enforcement makes this type of announcement it gives guidance to regulators direction on how to move next. Yes, there might be some form of coordination on the part of the government but don't be surprised if we have positive moves towards regulation in the near future.

That's right. People remember facts from the past and stick with them while there's new information, like from the OP for example, which is saying the opposite to what they are thinking. I personally like the fact that dozens of news sites (I just checked) have reported the news, so there's a hope that eventually, maybe in couple of months, everybody will be familiar with the fact that the use of Bitcoin in illegal activities has shrunk to 10% from 90% previously(around 5 years ago).

It depends on what you consider to be criminals. I doubt the ratio of usage back in the days was heavily biased towards criminals. It's something people just assume because of the term dark web.

I don't consider people to be a criminal if they want to buy weed or other natural forms of drugs. If that's what they want, and it doesn't bother or hurt anyone around them, then let them buy it. Why should we even care?

People need go grow a thicker skin and start to accept others as they are. Why do we have to call someone a criminal just because the law criminalizes certain practices? It makes no sense.

That is because people, in general, have this stereotypical idea that will never get removed easily, but only through time. It is a fact that crypto was used by criminal in the dark web. So, if they were taught about that, they should also be taught that crypto is used for good purposes too.

There are also people who do not know what crypto is.  If you introduce it to them and they take a guess, they will say "Maybe criminal use it to avoid getting tracked. Therefore, it is all about getting these people educated.

I reckon we should also ask the banks not to accept dollars and euros, and also ask the government to ban them hehehe. They are the most used currencies in the criminal underworld.

Also, why should we stop there? We can ask the goverment to ban carpentry and gardening tools because they can be used for killing people hehehe.

I've been always thinking that if a person uses Bitcoin, no matter how much knowledge about it they have, this person can be called an adopter. Also I think that we need more adopters like that, simple people who don't know and maybe will never know how the whole thing works, but they will be using BTC and that is what really important. We need much more people using BTC, maybe 20 times more than we have today, so that the whales lose their power to manipulate the market.

Sorry for the misunderstanding I was actually relating my terms in the author's statement as traders are the ones who contribute most of the daily traded volumes of cryptocurrencies in the market as compared to long term holders like you. I also know that a lot of speculators also exist in the market as trading is not suitable for everyone and they either don't have time to actively trade or is not comfortable using technical analysis for their buy and sell decisions.

Not necessarily. It depends on what you do with your coins. In my opinion, I would call traders people who are actively buying and selling for profit ie trading, whereas speculators are more like long term hodlers who are looking for big gains in the long term.  I wouldn't call myself a trader because I don't really do trades, but I do hold coins as a long term investment and I'm definitely speculating on the value being much higher in the near future than it is right now hence being a speculator.

It's more appropriate if you use "traders" rather than "speculators" as that what we really are. The US government might made this information available to the public as they now know where to look. They might still be relating cryptocurrencies to illegal activities and for this time around it is related to money laundering and tax evasion in the cryptocurrency market. Drugs is really a much more smaller market compared to cryptocurrency trading with new ICOs launching and everyone wants to gets rich (legally) there is no doubt that their market is bigger.

I'm actually surprised that they came out and said this. We know it to be true, but this 'but drug dealers use it' shtick seems to be their main point of attack and defamation and is going to be something politicians continue to use to discredit bitcoin whilst we also all still know that money is the best sort of anonymous currency and one preferred by drug dealers, yet surprise surprise this doesn't ever seem to be an issue.


I would say the initial owners/users of bitcoin where the tech geeks and cryptography enthusiasts, but then the second wave of bitcoiners were probably libertarians and those who saw it as a great way to buy drugs or subvert state control etc. You can't deny that Silk Road had a huge impact on both the popularity and usage of bitcoin. In fact, I first heard about bitcoin when it was on the news after being mentioned as some sort of currency that you could buy drugs with which piqued my interest to investigate it more. Once I found out it was new idea for decentralised cash that doesn't rely on third parties to use I was sold. The rest is history.

Years back, I would have contradict this report but with recent happenings its really going to be hard to refute it even though I don't have the statistics. The reason for that is simple. Its becoming very difficult to move huge value of crypto everyday for drug lords and people who wants to launder money fast considering they don't move little amount of money, and don't always have the luxury of time to move funds in bit in other to stay below the radar. Every service providers related to crypto are asking for KYCs down to gambling sites, ICO sites, centralized exchange sites and there is no easy way for any platform to convert huge amount of bitcoin to fiat without leaving some form of evidence in moving from one account to another.



You might be right though but that is not entirely true that only criminal uses Monero. If that is your argument then you are also supporting the fact that previously bitcoin is being used by criminals and also saying that the anonymity of bitcoin has been compromised that is why they are moving but don't forget that except the high net worth people in the underworld, you will need a platform to convert your crypto to fiat.

If you truly believe that, then you are missing the whole point of Bitcoin: it was started so people can do whatever they want with their money, without anyone else interfering. There's no such thing as "blockchain system", there are peer-to-peer networks that can not be taken down. You can ask exchanges to delist privacy coins, you can ask government to ban them, but you'll never be able to stop them.

Why only now? I reckon it has always been that way. Holders, which coins are obtained from buying, trading or mining, are also considered as speculators.

Also, the volumes of bitcoin used in the darknet drug trade were always overestimated by the news media to create FUD.

Criminals shifting from bitcoin to monero still means that the whole cryptocurrency still dominates the means of transactions especially in the darkweb. Privacy coins should not be encouraged and should be removed in the blockchain system.

Drug dealers could hid their assets in exchanges so they're no that easy to track by authorities. They did that strategy because of anonymous identity so small portions of btc transactions will successfully be sent. But I don't think it's the only transactions they had, and for my own knowledge more transactions with small portions of btc with different dates which they though of being safe from being traced. More speculators just buy and then sell immediately when target was achieved, so the domination doesn't became more rampant.

Yeah I also read the article just now and this is a good representation of Bitcoin and crypto out there. Alas it's good they know that people's perception about the criminal use of Bitcoin is very wrong. And as it was captured there, they even want people to use it for their medium of transaction because they can conduct some blockchain analysis and identify them. I wish everyone could read this and stop saying all the naysays about the use of BTC.

I wouldn't equate speculators buying Bitcoin with higher adoption. A good percentage of these speculators do not even know how to set up a bitcoin wallet or how a bitcoin address looks like. They would just buy Contracts-For-Differences or leave their bitcoins on exchanges.
On the positive side, atleast mainstream media acknowledges that drug dealers account for only a small portion of Bitcoin transactions.

Criminals use other sophisticated ways to steal people's money, and these sophisticated ways criminals use to steal people's money are:

- Icos

- Exchange

Currently many criminals are creating ICOs to steal millions of dollars from people and because the authorities are not yet rigorously inspecting these ICOs, it has created a loophole for criminals to commit to creating scam ICOs. Another opportunity that criminals are taking advantage of are the exchanges, given the lack of supervision and regulation, criminals saw the creation of exchange as the great opportunity to steal millions of dollars from people