Pages:
Author

Topic: [2018-10-25]We Asked Crypto News Outlets If They’d Take Money To Cover a Project - page 2. (Read 329 times)

legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3684
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Everyone pays for content, whether or not we find that acceptable, that's accepted. This forum also takes payment for advertising, so for me as long as it is clearly marked sponsored, people got to make money. BBC does it, Al Jazeera... Every news outlet does.

But for sure, shitty to learn that they'd take off the sponsored tag for more money but hardly surprising. Huffpost and Forbes sort of do the same, how else do you get ponzi Onecoin featured on their cover.
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427
The 'crypto press' has always been shit. I think it's going to get shitter.

Of course it will get shitter. Crypto related news outlets are only out to reach average joes, because everyone else with a moderate understanding of crypto shits on these news outlets. The deeper we dig into mainstream adoption, the shitter news outlets will become. That directly explains why the quality of the content has reached its lowest point in the last 12 months.

News outlets in general means news for the masses, which translates into fake news, sponsored (biased) news, old and low quality content. In other words, 99% rubbish.

Did anyone being here for at least since 2015 learn anything from the articles you have read on platforms as CCN, Coindesk, etc?
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
And more than half said yes

https://breakermag.com/we-asked-crypto-news-outlets-if-theyd-take-money-to-cover-a-project-more-than-half-said-yes/

And in certain cases if you pay extra it's lifted out of the 'sponsored' content category.

No surprise of course but there it is out in the open anyway. The 'crypto press' has always been shit. I think it's going to get shitter.

Pages:
Jump to: