is it really Craig Wright doing the suing? for shame
I feel like taking an even more contrarian stance; I hope Craig wins.
It could be an important (cultural, not legal) precedent: there has to reach a point where technology becomes so sophisticated that the justice system simply cannot make accurate/meaningful judgements in cases involving such technology. I'm sure there's plenty of judgements (and perhaps even case law) that have already demonstrated as such, and that Wright's case is simply another nail in the coffin of the legal system's credibility