I genuinely respect your respect for elders: however you can probably use just regular respect on the forum :-) There's nothing cliché in what Theymos said:
it is how it is right now
Thanks, -Its old habit - and thanks for the advice I will keep this in my mind next time.
We can respectfully agree to disagree on the "Cliche statement" Everyone has a different set of experience in their life and my statement based on my observations.
Right or Wrong? depends on the situations.
it seems impossible that a non Christian is elected.
If people like the candidate, most of them don't care much.
With due respect to your opinion, I know you are elder to me and sorry for that, but this statement is plain bullshit. (in this context)
It is one of the cliche quotes which every so-called intellectual talk in their drawing room, but when it comes to voting they go with other option."
Which one is the cliche'?
I wouldn't have an issue electing someone from another faith, that is the beauty of separation between church and state.
We are one nation under god---but that really should be where faith stops.
It was a big deal when Kennedy became the first Catholic president, there was concern that he would impose his beliefs on the nation.
Romney being a Mormon was a concern -->and yes Mormons
are Christians and typically
live their beliefs.
I don't think the rest of the country would be as open minded about electing someone outside of ...lol I was going to say
"Outside of one of the Abrahamic faiths"
But no; at this moment a candidate would probably at least have to claim they are a Christian.
Maybe Trump's presidency will change that?