how is it wrong? this is exactly the vision of sat0shi, having in the end only few big farms nothing else
even if the price rise, the diff would rise too(the cost of electricity too ecc...), in the end, small farms will be taken out , they will not be able to compete any more
p.s. 2-3 giant farms controlling the network doesn't mean centralized at all, centralized mean 1 farm controlling it aka 51%, otherwise i could argue that it is already centralized...
i can't undersood , you told me very hard i can't translate, you try little simple will tell me
that only few big farms will remain,
but this isn't a bad thing like many think, it's good, will make the network strongerThat's true. He foresaw that, but it has no correlation with the halving. This has already partially happened as mining can't be hobby anymore (unless one likes losing money). Mining has become industrialized.
That's nothing surprising. The same is happening with companies because of their low capital compared to the big players.
I think you don't see the difference between farms and pools.
Take a look:
https://blockchain.info/poolsThere are 4 major pools at the moment that are over 10%. Let's ignore that 'unknown' now.
Pooled mining is a mining approach where multiple generating clients contribute to the generation of a block, and then split the block reward according the contributed processing power. Pooled mining effectively reduces the granularity of the block generation reward, spreading it out more smoothly over time.
This means that the pools are consisting out of many miners (i.e. farms). You definitely can't argue that the mining is centralized now,
As long as we have a few pools and the hashrate is somewhat distributed we're okay. If we only have a few farms (2-3) then it is very centralized.
Also centralized mining is definitely not something good.