Pages:
Author

Topic: [2022-03-23]Thailand Bans Use of Cryptocurrencies as a Method of Payment (Read 643 times)

legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1403
Disobey.
The election is conducted next weekend.
Still curious if there are any forum members from Thailand around with an insight of what is actually going on regarding crypto legislation and how things may look after the elections have taken place.
jr. member
Activity: 35
Merit: 1
Thailand's economy has taken a hit from all the covid restrictions. They should embrace modern technology and payments are a means to get their economy back on track. Perhaps they dislike the fact that all payments are public on the blockchain for everyone to see Shocked
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1965
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
So, they are actually protecting their local currency, the Thai Baht. People must never underestimate the power that these governments have over citizens, when they can manipulate the value of the local currency. (The government have full control over the supply and they can manipulate the value of that currency)

It is also about their "image" ...because you find that a lot of the presidents have their face plastered all over Bank notes and the governors signature on the notes. (It is a huge ego boost for them)  Roll Eyes
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Thailand is one of the most corrupt countries in the world. They have a number of corruption scandals that have taken place in the past. This is the reason why they are trying to impose a ban on cryptocurrency. a law that prohibits cryptocurrency transactions in their country. This law is based on the principle of “free trade”. 
 
The government of Thailand has made
hero member
Activity: 1834
Merit: 879
Rollbit.com ⚔️Crypto Futures
I hope the Thai government understands that the power comes from its citizens, and in a scenario they speak with one voice to say that they cannot do without their beloved bitcoin... this could make it legal tender once it goes through the law making process Roll Eyes But not to get ahead of ourselves, sad to see that these guys hide behind protecting their financial systems, but all I see is a government suppressing the free will of its people... Anyway there is no country without laws but as long as you have access to the internet, bitcoin will live on.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1403
Disobey.
It said the curbs on cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin for commercial transactions are in line with regulations in Europe, the U.K., South Korea and Malaysia. "

The Thai government didn't give any genuine reason why they had to make such a policy. They don't even have personal experience or proof that cryptocurrencies harm or will harm their economy. The only reason is that they want to copy the policy of other nations. I have closely observed that most of the nations that are restricting cryptocurrencies do it because their colonial masters or some other bigger economy adopted the same policy. Very soon before any country will access loans from the IMF or World Bank one of the major criteria will be to ban or restrict cryptocurrency transactions.
Just a quick note in this case: Thailand was never colonized, but I guess this still doesn't necessarily mean they are uninfluenced by other countries' way of legislation.

Still, anyone with insight what is about to happen after the ongoing current eletion? Quite curious what we can expect in regards of crypto regulation in Thailands future.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 554
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
It said the curbs on cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin for commercial transactions are in line with regulations in Europe, the U.K., South Korea and Malaysia. "

The Thai government didn't give any genuine reason why they had to make such a policy. They don't even have personal experience or proof that cryptocurrencies harm or will harm their economy. The only reason is that they want to copy the policy of other nations. I have closely observed that most of the nations that are restricting cryptocurrencies do it because their colonial masters or some other bigger economy adopted the same policy. Very soon before any country will access loans from the IMF or World Bank one of the major criteria will be to ban or restrict cryptocurrency transactions.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1403
Disobey.
I know this topic is now almost 1 year old but didn't want to start a new one just to follow up on this.
Was wondering if there is any update on this legislation and especially how the upcoming election is assumed to influence these crypto-laws.

On another note: As far as I know the democratic party made a promise to distribute an internal cryptocurrency to all Thai citizens if they are indeed elected. I wonder if this is a bullish sign for other cryptocurrencies or should be seen as seperate event.
full member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 167
the prohibition policy after allowing its use. Then it will not be effective even though there may be legal consequences for those who violate it. because this will apply to e-commerce service providers and supermarkets while individual transactions if done carefully will escape the government's sight.
so indirectly the use of crypto for payments for services and goods will continue because they already understand the use and convenience
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1492
The law will be in force, yes, however can it be enforced or will it create more problems for the government? Similar to what you were saying, no can enforce the ban on transactions that are happening privately.

I think you are overemphasizing the possible problems that could arise for the government from such a law, especially if we take into account that this is a country that has quite strict laws that have in some way made society obedient. Of course, there are always those who do something illegal, but they are a minority that the police and the judiciary are focusing on. Such a law has been in place in Turkey for more than a year, and I have not read anywhere that it has created any problems for their government.

Yes I might be, however, it does not change the reality that enforcement of the ban will be hard. Also, on my original argument, they will have no choice but to remove the law. The cryptospace is not something similar to illegal drugs where the government should ban it. It is unstoppable game changing technology. I speculate that the emergence of the cryptospace will be something similar to the fax machine. During the 1980s in America, it was said that it was decreed that fax messages were a type of mail and all fax machines were needed to be registered and stamped in the post office. The law was removed of course and I am certain it be similar to laws limiting the usage of the cryptospace.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
The law will be in force, yes, however can it be enforced or will it create more problems for the government? Similar to what you were saying, no can enforce the ban on transactions that are happening privately.

I think you are overemphasizing the possible problems that could arise for the government from such a law, especially if we take into account that this is a country that has quite strict laws that have in some way made society obedient. Of course, there are always those who do something illegal, but they are a minority that the police and the judiciary are focusing on. Such a law has been in place in Turkey for more than a year, and I have not read anywhere that it has created any problems for their government.



You can only bail out Banks with tax payers money for a while, until the tax payers gets fed up with that... and then those governments will go down.  Wink  (Not by force, but by votes)

You underestimate people and their ability to forget very easily, which means that they can be very easily manipulated from a political perspective. Often people have no choice to choose someone better and fairer, because the alternative is sometimes a much worse choice. Democracy is just a nicely packaged fabrication for naive people who think they are deciding something - and with a few exceptions, everything else is a big lie.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1965
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I quote  ==> "The SEC said it decided to regulate and control the use of digital assets after discussing the "risks and benefits" with the Bank of Thailand, the central bank, according to a statement Wednesday. The risks cited include losses from price volatility, cybertheft and money laundering."

It just shows you who are controlling the governments and the politicians of this world. Satoshi Nakamoto saw how much control Banks had over the government and Satoshi created this technology to provide people with an alternative when those Banks eventually fail. You can only bail out Banks with tax payers money for a while, until the tax payers gets fed up with that... and then those governments will go down.  Wink  (Not by force, but by votes)
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1492
The question was really something that does not need an answer. It is a challenge on how the government of Thailand can enforce a ban on cryptocurrencies where a group of people can use it for ICOs, Defi and NFTs. Will sending digital art or gift card tokens also be banned? What is their definition of cryptocurrencies.

I've already answered you, but for some reason, you don't want (or can't) understand that no one can ban personal transactions or anything that happens privately. The thing is that this should not be done by business entities, and I guess it is logical that the law applies to all cryptocurrencies.

The government of Thailand would be creating more problems for themselves and they might not have the budget and the knowledge to solve these problems. I predict the removal of these restrictions in 3 years.

What problems? The law will be in force, anyone who does not respect it and is caught will be punished, whoever manages to get under the radar will not be punished, the thing is very clear. You underestimate Thailand as a country ruled by completely different rules, and @buwaytress described it well - they simply have a tradition of strict control that did not arise yesterday or 10 years ago.

I was agreeing with your reply. I was always telling everyone that enforcement of the law on cryptocoins transactions would be a problem for regulators. It would be harder if the coins used are anonymous coins similar to Monero. However, the question is how would the government define digital items by law. This is why I bring up digital art and gift cards which are really just software tokens which can be a problem depending on how the law defines it.

The law will be in force, yes, however can it be enforced or will it create more problems for the government? Similar to what you were saying, no can enforce the ban on transactions that are happening privately.
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
Now I know why we had such a high increase of users from Thailand in the past 4 weeks. Shocked
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 3191
Leave no FUD unchallenged
Now this has cought attention. I wonder what could be the possible reason of the ban. I believe it’s the reluctance to loose control and embrace change and insecurity of possible economic frauds. 

The simplest answer is often the most likely.  Those with power don't want to relinquish control over it.  It's interesting that governments either see Bitcoin as a threat or an opportunity, or they can't decide which it is.  Few want to ignore it anymore.  I guess that's something.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1159
Now this has cought attention. I wonder what could be the possible reason of the ban. I believe it’s the reluctance to loose control and embrace change and insecurity of possible economic frauds.  Government fear anonimity. China has outright made crypto illegal and thialand has followed the trend.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
This sounds like what Turkey did few months (or years maybe?) ago.

The answer to your question can be found in post number 2 - some still do not read anything but the title, but maybe the problem is that some have too many members on ignore list ...



The question was really something that does not need an answer. It is a challenge on how the government of Thailand can enforce a ban on cryptocurrencies where a group of people can use it for ICOs, Defi and NFTs. Will sending digital art or gift card tokens also be banned? What is their definition of cryptocurrencies.

I've already answered you, but for some reason, you don't want (or can't) understand that no one can ban personal transactions or anything that happens privately. The thing is that this should not be done by business entities, and I guess it is logical that the law applies to all cryptocurrencies.

The government of Thailand would be creating more problems for themselves and they might not have the budget and the knowledge to solve these problems. I predict the removal of these restrictions in 3 years.

What problems? The law will be in force, anyone who does not respect it and is caught will be punished, whoever manages to get under the radar will not be punished, the thing is very clear. You underestimate Thailand as a country ruled by completely different rules, and @buwaytress described it well - they simply have a tradition of strict control that did not arise yesterday or 10 years ago.
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1492
How will the government of Thailand enforce the ban?

Quite simply, all legal entities are no longer allowed to accept cryptocurrencies as a means of payment, and anyone who would continue to do so would be breaking the law. Given the penalties in that country, I don't think it will occur to anyone to try to do something illegal.

Of course, this does not mean that crypto transactions in that country will stop in terms of payment for goods and services, they will only take place privately between individuals. No government can prevent the use of Bitcoin for private purposes, that is the beauty of the whole system that can continue to operate despite any ban.

The question was really something that does not need an answer. It is a challenge on how the government of Thailand can enforce a ban on cryptocurrencies where a group of people can use it for ICOs, Defi and NFTs. Will sending digital art or gift card tokens also be banned? What is their definition of cryptocurrencies.

The government of Thailand would be creating more problems for themselves and they might not have the budget and the knowledge to solve these problems. I predict the removal of these restrictions in 3 years.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 2442
This sounds like what Turkey did few months (or years maybe?) ago. It is not a full ban on using/trading crypto but businesses won't be able to take it as a payment. This kills the most important use case of the crypto currencies, the currency part. Without it, they are just crypto assets which you can buy and sell on the exchanges but can't buy real goods with them. I guess that's how they are planning to fight crypto. You can speculate on them but you can't use them as "money".
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3684
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
@DooMAD, some of us still remember well our colleague from the forum who at one point disappeared saving his life from the very strict laws that this country has for many things, which include the death penalty. Come to think of it, I'm surprised they haven't declared Bitcoin illegal and imposed the death penalty on anyone who trades or pays with it - although they're well on their way to making it a reality one day.

Indeed some of us do...

re Thai, I personally thought there has been slow signs of things relaxing in recent years and I say this in the loosest way possible, given just how strict they were in the past. I come from the region so I completely get where they were/are coming from. The only country in our nook of the world to never have been a colony of a foreign power, and they believe it was their strict policies and preservation of extreme control that's helped them do that (historians believe in several theories).

So it's a bit of a surprise to learn of this news... given how hot and heavy they wanted to be with blockchain/crypto regulations since 2017. So much for being a rival blockchain-crypto-emerging tech hub to Singapore.

P.S. Quite the opposite of what others have done (ban payment and not trading).
Pages:
Jump to: