Topic: [2025] Complete Guide to NO KYC Crypto Casinos - SpinTalk.org - page 2. (Read 507 times)

Same here mate, I don't know if the op has even gone through the reply a lot of users have given here on the thread.. he should change the title to low kyc casinos and not No kyc casinos. Most of them are licensed but claims to be no kyc. We have seen so many of such here before which later Forces their users to go through kyc sooner or later and most time with immediate effects to access their funds. So l think it's better he just changes it to low kyc casino and not the term he had used

It also got some genuine interest too. You can always ignore the comments you don't want to see and engage with the ones you want to.
Is the discord server still active? I think I joined at some point, but can't find it on my list now.

Good to see you sticking around.

@upgrade
Honestly man, my SpinTalk post got so much hate that it discouraged me from coming back there to update it. I might update it in the future and it's nice to see a familiar name here!


This is exactly right, and the same point that the MonkeyTilt guy brought up. "No Kyc casino" is a term that most people recognize and understand that the typical player is not going to have any KYC. People here are taking it too seriously. I'm not saying that these casinos won't flag you if you are suspected of money laundering or suspicious behavior (Example - Advantaged playing or bonus abuse) but for the TYPICAL consumer, they will never experience KYC.

I only feel confident in this because I have the withdrawal numbers to back it up. 95% of all the players under my affiliate codes are from the USA, using a VPN to access these casinos. We are not able to KYC as all these sites exclude (wink wink) USA. We have over 500k in withdrawals just from the first 2 on this list. The reason we prefer these casinos is access to a wider range of games than sweepstake casinos offer in the USA. Evolution Live Game shows, NoLimit City Slots, the full range of Hacksaw, and Pragmatic Play slots, etc.. This list is primarily for USA players that want to access geo-restricted games. If you are outside of the USA, you can still use this list, but you probably are okay to KYC anyways unless you're in a different restricted country or trying to do something malicious.

Long Story Short - The typical user will not experience KYC, and this list is mostly for USA players that want to access geo-restricted games.

I feel like this is a bait because any casino on the list will ask for KYC on huge wins, and isn't fair for users to think that they are using a non-kyc game while they will be asked for their documents in some conditions.

So, please add this special conditions for each casino.

I was trying to check the link but the network from my end is very poor so I can't access the website to see if what the Op is saying is legit. But from what others have said, that is not a "No KYC". A casino that asks even a phone number is not a no KYC but a KYC casino. A no KYC casino only required email and password or Username and Password. And anything apart from those information it is no longer "No KYC" again.

Many casinos asked some few information at the registration time and when the gambler wins huge amount then full KYC will be submitted. So stating No KYC is like luring gamblers to visit the casino and sign up.

99% of the existing online gambling sites will set rules of withdrawal limit which are even on nonKYC gambling sites. There will be a high withdrawal you they may not want the customer to withdraw unless the customer divided the money and gradually withdrawing it little by little if it is daily withdrawal limit.

Any gambling site that does that allow deposit but does not allow withdrawal are KYC casinos. This is common among crypto gambling sites but which is not good at all. If KYC is mandatory, it should be mandatory for deposit also.

The sudden and unexpected KYC that any player may encounter when withdrawing money after winning, even in casinos that declare "no-KYC", is perhaps the most global problem in matters of the game of those players who for some reason do not want or cannot provide their personal data to the casino.
And I can't even imagine yet whether it will be possible to solve this global problem with the passage of time and the development of the gambling industry on a global scale.
There are no visible opportunities for its solution yet.

Isn't this the problem with most "No KYC" platforms and this thread? The definition of no KYC can be misleading, especially if the platform's ToS includes stuff like "malicious activity" without any way for users to verify how they do that process. Anyway, expecting a centralized platform to operate without constraint is a bit hopeful to begin with. On the other hand, the fact that new casinos keep popping out with their "no KYC" marketing shows that there is a demand for privacy-focused casino platforms.

Talking about kyc demands, a gambling platform should not ask for that as long as they are known to be under the category of those that does not request for kyc, but if they are under the kyc casinos but didn't place demands on that, they will definitely do so later over the time, this could come in when we wanted to make withdrawals or other use of their functional services.

Checked the list and the first 4 casinos which are labelled as No KYC are actually licensed casinos and KYC is likely to be asked sooner or later.
In general, there will be no 100% No KYC licensed casinos because all of them reserve the right to ask KYC at anytime so the best terminology should be "KYC friendly" or "non mandatory KYC" instead of No KYC.
About the VPN friendly, I think aside the first 4 casinos, the other casinos are also VPN friendly such as Stake and Duelbits.
For the whole list, I find many new names but I also miss some popular crypto casinos such as Livecasino, Roobet, Shuffle, Bitcasino, Fortunejack, Metawin and some others. 

the thing is, despite that they are still not a no-kyc casino and to be honest the most I'd call them is "kyc-lenient" casinos. don't get me wrong, I don't have anything against them but saying the casino is no-kyc and then on the ToS they reserve the right to ask for it whenever they want can be misleading.

This is a grey area. Some casinos while being kyc friendly do not state that you can use VPNs and those using it, run the risk of their account being flagged if they are about to make a withdrawal.
It's much preferable for a casino to state clearly if you're allowed to use VPNs to access their website.

Btw, I remember your announcement thread for spintalk some months back. Don't you consider bumping that up with updates like these?

Nowadays, it is difficult to see the casino have no KYC because in the end, the casino can apply that to their members especially when they want to withdraw. That is what happens in many casinos so I don't thinks that the casino really has no KYC for their members.

We must be ready if someday the casino requires us to do KYC and if we do not agree we can leaves the casino and search for other casinos. But we may gets the same things in the other casinos as the government wants to monitor their people who often to playing gambling.

When I clicked the link and saw what appeared on the first page of the website, the image posted above and the second terms and conditions exposed the platform to be centralized casinos because they operate with a license which shows their full compliance with regulations. Note that, simply because a casino did not ask for KYC upfront doesn't make them a no-KYC casino as you insinuated in your comments, as long as the casino is centralized regardless of their ask for verification at the point of account opening or later on it all ball down to centralized casinos and fully KYC, so most of the casinos on your list are centralized and fully KYC, you have to readjust and correct your list and casinos that can appear as NO KYC.

DeFi casinos are the only ones with no KYC. More and more are starting to pop up.

BC.GAME no KYC? Lmao. Those dumdums requested KYC from me for a small amount thanks to which I ended up abandoning them and switched to better sites that don't request KYC for such nonsensical reasons.

I respect your intiative op, but your list isn't exactly accurate since any centralised site can request KYC at any point of time for literally any reason using the TOS as their shield which some posters above already pointed out.

In my opinion, which I hope is shared by many gambling players, no-KYC casinos are now practically non-existent, since an anonymous player can also win quite a large win in some game, but still will not be able to withdraw this money to his wallet without providing personal data. And by the way, I believe that the real absence among the many casinos accepting payments in cryptocurrency of a complete absence of such a casino that would actually, in writing and in the ToS, guarantee the player the payment of any amount won anonymously and without KYC is a big blunder and a big drawback in the entire gambling industry in the world.
But I believe that in the near future, most likely, there simply will not be such brave businessmen in the gambling industry who would dare to implement such a project and somehow agree with the local authorities on the legality of such a business. And the authorities most likely will not allow this if the business does not find a suitable jurisdiction.  And of course, the banking community will also actively oppose this, citing some kind of money laundering and other nonsense.

Centralized casinos are completely KYC... still casinos that have a license then KYC will be mandatory later if the casino requires it.

And what you say is true, where most casinos are now No-KYC... I played several times at various casino brands and it passed no-KYC because of the withdrawal of a small amount that was not any violation.

But if the withdrawal is in large amounts, it is usually certain that the casino will ask you to do KYC, usually large withdrawals will be closely monitored by the casino.

Most casinos now implement this non KYC if it is just to be able to deposit and play in a casino at the early stage.  KYC is mostly requested when their is suspicious activities from the gambler or in a case of huge deposits or withdrawal, and this is mostly done to ensure the money is clean with no trace of money laundering or terrorist financing or even drugs. Casinos always put  in their TOS that they might request for KYC at later stage or when they deep necessary which means they are not entire KYC free.

1.Non-KYC casinos, that are "licensed and legit"? This seems weird to me. Most casinos, that are really licensed and legit have mandatory KYC policies.
2.So you have worked with these casino operators and this is supposed to prove that the casinos are legit? What if these casino operators have been legit with you, but scammed other people?  Can you prove that you have worked with them? Any videos, that clearly prove that you have tested those casinos? "Talking to the operators" doesn't prove that the casinos are legit.
There will always be a certain level of risk, when someone is using a VPN-friendly, non-KYC casino.