Topic: [2.1 MHS] Experimental virtual scrypt mining - page 3. (Read 3665 times)
i wouldn't mind testing it for you either , if you still have slots available
Miner works and is hashing away BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC
Thanks for the positive feedback.
I'm working hard to build a real interface, like nodejs.
If there is enough interest, I have many interesting plans to carry on and scale this project.
The idea is to "recycle" somewhat my GPUs, I have a potential 8500 KHS to deploy.
Miner works and is hashing away at about 1258 KH/s
Next slot available at 21:30 UTC
Just a quick tip.
I advice everyone using/trying this server to create a worker with a password which they don't use.
I advice everyone using/trying this server to create a worker with a password which they don't use.
While it is a good generic advice, I do not really see the point here. What harm can come out of everyone knowing my miner worker user and pass? The only outcome I can see is others mining for me, which they are certainly welcome to do.. ;-) Am I missing something obvious?
To the OP. An interesting idea, but If you have hashrate at your disposal, why not use it yourself?
Yes, and it will never be repeated / reposted enough times...
So the next slot is starting at 20:10 UTC for those interested.
OK, I'll bite.
@bitcoininformation: I see.
Just a quick tip.
I advice everyone using/trying this server to create a worker with a password which they don't use.
I advice everyone using/trying this server to create a worker with a password which they don't use.
While it is a good generic advice, I do not really see the point here. What harm can come out of everyone knowing my miner worker user and pass? The only outcome I can see is others mining for me, which they are certainly welcome to do.. ;-) Am I missing something obvious?
To the OP. An interesting idea, but If you have hashrate at your disposal, why not use it yourself?
Yes, and it will never be repeated / reposted enough times...
So the next slot is starting at 20:10 UTC for those interested.
Just a quick tip.
I advice everyone using/trying this server to create a worker with a password which they don't use.
I advice everyone using/trying this server to create a worker with a password which they don't use.
While it is a good generic advice, I do not really see the point here. What harm can come out of everyone knowing my miner worker user and pass? The only outcome I can see is others mining for me, which they are certainly welcome to do.. ;-) Am I missing something obvious?
To the OP. An interesting idea, but If you have hashrate at your disposal, why not use it yourself?
Just a quick tip.
I advice everyone using/trying this server to create a worker with a password which they don't use.
I advice everyone using/trying this server to create a worker with a password which they don't use.
While it is a good generic advice, I do not really see the point here. What harm can come out of everyone knowing my miner worker user and pass? The only outcome I can see is others mining for me, which they are certainly welcome to do.. ;-) Am I missing something obvious?
To the OP. An interesting idea, but If you have hashrate at your disposal, why not use it yourself?
Just a quick tip.
I advice everyone using/trying this server to create a worker with a password which they don't use.
I advice everyone using/trying this server to create a worker with a password which they don't use.
Obviously a reasonable and sound advice
Traffic is *not* over HTTPS yet. Use dummy values. Create a sandbox account. Etc.
Just a quick tip.
I advice everyone using/trying this server to create a worker with a password which they don't use.
I advice everyone using/trying this server to create a worker with a password which they don't use.
I think this is a pretty good Idea,
Wouldn't mind testing it for you.
Wouldn't mind testing it for you.
Nice :-)
First to answer, so you get the first slot, I guess it's fair enough.
I will give you 120 minutes for the 1st test, and then I will redefine the slots according to the demand.
Currently, the pool settings work like this:
- Pool 0: static, will be used until you dynamically set pool 1
- Pool 1: dynamic, will be used instead of pool 0 as soon as you set it from the web interface
Please PM me the static settings you want for pool 0, i.e. URL, worker and password.
It is cgminer based, so you can use stratum+tcp:// format URLs.
Does that work for you?
yea, that works fine. Let me just grab my usual settings and I'll PM to you
I think this is a pretty good Idea,
Wouldn't mind testing it for you.
Wouldn't mind testing it for you.
Nice :-)
First to answer, so you get the first slot, I guess it's fair enough.
I will give you 120 minutes for the 1st test, and then I will redefine the slots according to the demand.
(EDIT: test rounds will be 60 min until further notice)
Currently, the pool settings work like this:
- Pool 0: static, will be used until you dynamically set pool 1
- Pool 1: dynamic, will be used instead of pool 0 as soon as you set it from the web interface
Please PM me the static settings you want for pool 0, i.e. URL, worker and password.
It is cgminer based, so you can use stratum+tcp:// format URLs.
Does that work for you?
Yes, it does. Now we get what you want from us 
Well I bet you can find someone. Free money, who doesn't want that?
Well I bet you can find someone. Free money, who doesn't want that?
I think this is a pretty good Idea,
Wouldn't mind testing it for you.
Wouldn't mind testing it for you.
I want to provide a virtual mining service, i.e. you buy hash power for a certain duration and you control the workers, you can configure them to use any pool you want with any worker name.
I have put together a proof-of-concept interface and I want some feedback from an experimented alt-coin miners who is still believing in the possible profitability of scrypt-mining, of course. For the firsts tests, testers will not have to pay anything and will be rewarded with their mining profits, so it's small pocket money - yay - of course their is no SLA or guarantee of any kind.
Does that explain the project more clearly?
I have put together a proof-of-concept interface and I want some feedback from an experimented alt-coin miners who is still believing in the possible profitability of scrypt-mining, of course. For the firsts tests, testers will not have to pay anything and will be rewarded with their mining profits, so it's small pocket money - yay
- of course their is no SLA or guarantee of any kind.Does that explain the project more clearly?
I don't get what you want from us. Do you want a miner? Do you want someone to use your miner? Do you want us to mine for you? What?
Reserved...
Hello,
I am looking for a first tester for my experimental virtual scrypt mining project.
Mining hashrate would be about 1200 KHS and the tester can keep the proceeds from the mining tests. Currently the alpha interface should already allow you to dynamically switch pools, so you can mine any coins and follow profitability.
There is currently only one slot available, but more to come.
Watch this topic for more info. Thanks for your interest!
I am looking for a first tester for my experimental virtual scrypt mining project.
Mining hashrate would be about 1200 KHS and the tester can keep the proceeds from the mining tests. Currently the alpha interface should already allow you to dynamically switch pools, so you can mine any coins and follow profitability.
There is currently only one slot available, but more to come.
Watch this topic for more info. Thanks for your interest!
Jump to: