Gogo is the biggest troll in this forum. Everybody can see that.
66.7% is in fact sustainable, and our ROI can be even higher. Gogo is just a uninitiated square.
That said, due to the hate some of you are spewing we are going to be changing our service model after our 50th win. (And let's get it straight about the pick being posted. YOU are the one complaining after the game is over. More than 150 people saw our notification and NO ONE said anything about the pick not appearing on our site - because it was clearly and obviously there! Maybe you need to learn how to use the refresh button? Not to mention it's been posted 50 days in a row without complication
)
The new plan is as follows. After the 50th win an active affiliate account on one of our partner books will be required to receive the free daily plays, as well as any bonus plays we have.
As an exception to this if you get on our email list now until the 50th win, you'll continue to receive free plays indefinitely! So for the kind supporters out there, please get on our email list now
BTC Clowns - "
66.7% is in fact sustainable, and our ROI can be even higher. Gogo is just a uninitiated square."
I'm going to quote a post from someone else from another forum:
"
Do you know what a bettor could make hitting 60 percent of his plays? Let's assume you start with the $1,000 you were planning to buy a couch with. Instead, you decide to take a pot shot with it. You choose to play only one game per day and wager what would normally be an insane 10 percent of your bankroll on each play, laying minus-110.
A little over five years later you wind up with a record of 1,200 wins and 800 losses for a 60 percent record ATS. Guess how much money your $1,000 will have increased? It's not $10,000 and not $50,000. It's an incredible $550 billion. Yes, that’s BILLION. It sounds ridiculous, but believe me, the math completely supports it. [ NOTE by Gogo - The above analysis assumes a "rolling bank" - i.e., the bankroll is adjusted daily to each day's Win/Loss amount].
Now, the above analysis doesn’t prove that it cannot be done. However, it surely must place the burden of proof to those claiming they hit 60 percent of their plays. Given the above, how could they not have accumulated a large fortune? You hear the same tired excuses found below.
1) They can hit 60 percent, but are too streaky. In addition, the few bad runs wipe them out. Sorry, I'm not buying it. In the above example, all you need is a record of 1,200 wins and 800 losses. Any order of wins and losses will produce the same final results.
2) They have poor money management. Sorry, again I simply don't accept it. As my numbers show, having an ability to hit at 60 percent is akin to owning a printing press full of money. Even with some lousy money management, you should still make a small fortune (instead of a large fortune).
3) They are critical of my example since they doubt that anyone could bet millions on one game without the line moving. It's a good argument, and I concur. However, this only becomes a problem after one has clearly sailed into easy multimillionaire status.
So the next time a guy tells you he is a 60 percent handicapper, you might want to confirm he is a multimillionaire."
Of course these 67% plus billionaires are (unsurprisingly) having a hard time coming up with one btc to gamble.
(But remember - they've got your back).
