3 undervalued ICO's - page 5. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Cryptogiji

member

Activity: 278

Merit: 11

Quote from: honeyduckgoose on December 16, 2017, 03:43:18 AM

So recent update :-

Commerceblock has gotten to 30% (which is an increase) but the ICO is finishing in 3 days, I am assuming they will extend it.

Crowdholding has put a pre-ICO lock on their tokens (on the video that was the only thing stopping the guy from investing). What do you think? Can read about it here - https://medium.com/@crowdholding/great-results-pre-ico-investments-announcement-195400914233

Interesting.

a) Commereceblock will extend it will not surprise me, a lot of ICO's have extended from Novemeber / December.

b) Great news for potential investors in Crowdholding! I think they needed to do this since they are only aiming for 1 million goal. Pre-ICO would have too many of the coin and would probably dump it as soon as it hits the exchange.

honeyduckgoose

full member

Activity: 162

Merit: 100

So recent update :-

Commerceblock has gotten to 30% (which is an increase) but the ICO is finishing in 3 days, I am assuming they will extend it.

Crowdholding has put a pre-ICO lock on their tokens (on the video that was the only thing stopping the guy from investing). What do you think? Can read about it here - https://medium.com/@crowdholding/great-results-pre-ico-investments-announcement-195400914233

bleskyblesk

brand new

Activity: 0

Merit: 0

Really good video, I think more light needs to be shined on ICO's like these.

carrie_white

full member

Activity: 784

Merit: 101

Quote from: honeyduckgoose on December 04, 2017, 08:26:51 AM

Hello everyone,

I have just watched this video which shows 3 ICO's that are undervalued and look like very interesting projects.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUsEy4zfDFw

Has anyone heard of these projects and if you know of them, what do you think? Any help?

Crowdholding - https://ico.crowdholding.com/
FortKnoxster - https://fortknoxster.com/
Commerceblock - https://www.commerceblock.com/

Cheers!

thank you very much for the video and project information you shared, this is very useful, I will keep abreast of the latest news from the projects

CryptoEnthused

member

Activity: 190

Merit: 15

The most undervalued now, in my opinion, is Zabercoin. They have everything - great idea, trusted team and well known advisors.
And I agree that Crowdfunding is undervalued too. I'll check out the rest. Never heard of them.
The thing is good projects are often undervalued, in the long term they will win over most of the hype ICOs. Good projects are focused on the development, not marketing

zebmmo

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

I don't think you can't decide which ico undervalue because we need to see it perform. You have decide those 3 project is undervalue but what if these project is failed in devolop?
Yeah that might happen and investors will lots their money.

honeyduckgoose

full member

Activity: 162

Merit: 100

Quote from: winteriscoming91 on December 09, 2017, 04:04:59 AM

How is mining deal here?

I don't know about mining capabilities right now as they are either going through their ICO, or haven't launched yet. I would ask on their threads winterincoming91.

Quote from: faragly on December 09, 2017, 07:03:30 AM

Quote from: honeyduckgoose on December 04, 2017, 08:26:51 AM

Hello everyone,

I have just watched this video which shows 3 ICO's that are undervalued and look like very interesting projects.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUsEy4zfDFw

Has anyone heard of these projects and if you know of them, what do you think? Any help?

Crowdholding - https://ico.crowdholding.com/
FortKnoxster - https://fortknoxster.com/
Commerceblock - https://www.commerceblock.com/

Cheers!

I really like the FortKnoxster project, here is my article on this project. I would advise to pay attention to Bluzelle (in my signature) and GoNetwork.

I find it difficult to find something really worthwhile when everyone wants to deceive investors and just collect a lot of money.

I will have a look at your article, thanks for sharing!

Quote from: qazgroup on December 09, 2017, 07:06:30 AM

From that list I know about crowdholding, they have a good team and a working product but the ico seems to be open for too long, I think they should announce the ico to close max by January. Taking it till March will not have a good impression.

I read that they are keeping it open till then at the latest, if they raise their goal of 1 million USD they will close the ICO. I agree it is a long time, but right now November was poor and crypto kitties are slowing everything down so that's December gone as well. I think it is better to set a later goal than to keep pushing it back again and again. Also I don't think there is actually a rule of having it open for a month, that's just the common thing to do so why not extend it?

Quote from: slavcoinking on December 10, 2017, 01:14:43 PM

Good list, thank you for sharing.

I will look into all of the ICO's here.

You are very welcome slavcoinking, I would check out his other videos as well. I am sure this guy will come out with some more great content.

honeyduckgoose

full member

Activity: 162

Merit: 100

Quote from: JoyofCrypto on December 10, 2017, 06:08:41 PM

How can an ICO be undervalued when you can't even know if the project will even exist after a month? A coin or token can only be undervalued when it has a product that is working, not while it's in a stage of an ICO and has nothing...

I think it is with the potential they have that they are undervalued, If you look at the video he takes a lot of different factors into consideration to score them. Also for example Crowdholding has a working platform before they launched their ICO. The way I see it, they have more of a value than other ICO's that are launching with just a concept and a whitepaper.

I do agree with your point though in theory, but if you extend your idea to all ICO's then they are all overvalued until they complete their fundraising and get onto an exchange.

slavcoinking

brand new

Activity: 0

Merit: 0

Good list, thank you for sharing.

I will look into all of the ICO's here.

JoyofCrypto

member

Activity: 198

Merit: 10

How can an ICO be undervalued when you can't even know if the project will even exist after a month? A coin or token can only be undervalued when it has a product that is working, not while it's in a stage of an ICO and has nothing...

honeyduckgoose

full member

Activity: 162

Merit: 100

Quote from: bribed on December 08, 2017, 10:28:00 PM

Quote from: honeyduckgoose on December 08, 2017, 10:24:54 AM

Quote from: bribed on December 08, 2017, 07:53:32 AM

Quote from: honeyduckgoose on December 08, 2017, 04:34:23 AM

I agree bribed, it doesn't look great. But I also see it from their point of view, if you were planning an ICO and you were seeing companies breaking 20/30 million around you, why not aim to be up there with them? Means you can push more money into the project and scale. I don't think it was greed, but ambition. Also I read something that November was a really bad month for ICO's in the amount of investments.

Hey Honeyduckgoose, I do see it from their point of view and understand that as well. As I said while almost all ICO's raising way more than they need to develop their product its a natural thing that you as new project also aim to raise fund in this area. But yet again, this just diminished the trust I had in the ICO, sure one can lower the hardcap as it cant be reached (november indeed was a very slow month for ICO's) but lower it 49 times? I dont want to badmouth crowdholding, I really like the project and hope that they will have success with what they are doing, its more that Im turned off by this from the whole ICO space, Crowdholding was just a recent example that showed clearly what goes wrong in this space. The seed funding and VC funding rounds do have a purpose, they are not just deplyoyed to oppress the Startups and give them little capital as possible. I just think that ICO's nowadays should rather focus on delivering and not just grabbing insane amounts of money, if they need further funding, they can still start a new fundraiser and will surely collect more. The news that this ICO raised 150m and that ICO raised 100m just sheds a bad light on our space, thats just my point of view.

I completely agree with you bribed. It is sadly a symptom of the ICO space. VC funding does have it's advantages but also a lot of negatives for small business ideas. After the 3rd round of investment the owner of the idea usually has lost control of their own idea.

I agree again, VC definitely got negative sides. For this reason I love the idea of ICO's so much, I just dislike that start-ups / blockchain projects raise way more than they need because this hurts the space overall and will likely force governments to step in at some point at last when the first class action law suits are filed. Hopefully the space will manage to come to reason itself. Time will tell.

Glad we are on the same page, I think this will only be corrected when regulation is put in place (which is inevitable at some point) or poor ICO's / ICO's who just concentrate on marketing stop raising stupid amounts of money.

iloveturtles

newbie

Activity: 195

Merit: 0

Like how people are throwing some other undervalued ICO's, maybe we should contact the youtube guy to give his opinion on the ones that people have put forward.

GuiDonK

member

Activity: 140

Merit: 11

I believe in this ICO: Veritas Mining. They are crypto miners that have come together to mine on a large scale basis, and they will be mining Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dash, Litecoin, Zcash, Monero.

sleblanc1469

full member

Activity: 294

Merit: 100

Looks like guy see into cryptoworld closely. Interesting that there are many overvalued or scum projects.

qazgroup

member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 20

RiveMont

From that list I know about crowdholding, they have a good team and a working product but the ico seems to be open for too long, I think they should announce the ico to close max by January. Taking it till March will not have a good impression.

faragly

sr. member

Activity: 588

Merit: 262

Quote from: honeyduckgoose on December 04, 2017, 08:26:51 AM

Hello everyone,

I have just watched this video which shows 3 ICO's that are undervalued and look like very interesting projects.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUsEy4zfDFw

Has anyone heard of these projects and if you know of them, what do you think? Any help?

Crowdholding - https://ico.crowdholding.com/
FortKnoxster - https://fortknoxster.com/
Commerceblock - https://www.commerceblock.com/

Cheers!

I really like the FortKnoxster project, here is my article on this project. I would advise to pay attention to Bluzelle (in my signature) and GoNetwork.

I find it difficult to find something really worthwhile when everyone wants to deceive investors and just collect a lot of money.

steviegboots

newbie

Activity: 105

Merit: 0

Amazing list and a very informative video. Love the fact he doesn't just say it's undervalued but explains why in great detail.

I keep seeing bee token popping up on this thread, someone is pushing hard to get noticed. Never heard of that token. And after a quick research they have a poor to average reviews and a very weak social media, not had time to look into the white paper but I think I won't bother.

winteriscoming91

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

How is mining deal here?

Olatunjex

full member

Activity: 1064

Merit: 102

On my list the number one most undervalued ico is VEE i don't know why people can't see the awesome potential in
VEE, i hold some bulk of it and will hold at leat for a year. I see this hitting 1$ in a year or two.

bribed

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: honeyduckgoose on December 08, 2017, 10:24:54 AM

Quote from: bribed on December 08, 2017, 07:53:32 AM

Quote from: honeyduckgoose on December 08, 2017, 04:34:23 AM

I agree bribed, it doesn't look great. But I also see it from their point of view, if you were planning an ICO and you were seeing companies breaking 20/30 million around you, why not aim to be up there with them? Means you can push more money into the project and scale. I don't think it was greed, but ambition. Also I read something that November was a really bad month for ICO's in the amount of investments.

Hey Honeyduckgoose, I do see it from their point of view and understand that as well. As I said while almost all ICO's raising way more than they need to develop their product its a natural thing that you as new project also aim to raise fund in this area. But yet again, this just diminished the trust I had in the ICO, sure one can lower the hardcap as it cant be reached (november indeed was a very slow month for ICO's) but lower it 49 times? I dont want to badmouth crowdholding, I really like the project and hope that they will have success with what they are doing, its more that Im turned off by this from the whole ICO space, Crowdholding was just a recent example that showed clearly what goes wrong in this space. The seed funding and VC funding rounds do have a purpose, they are not just deplyoyed to oppress the Startups and give them little capital as possible. I just think that ICO's nowadays should rather focus on delivering and not just grabbing insane amounts of money, if they need further funding, they can still start a new fundraiser and will surely collect more. The news that this ICO raised 150m and that ICO raised 100m just sheds a bad light on our space, thats just my point of view.

I completely agree with you bribed. It is sadly a symptom of the ICO space. VC funding does have it's advantages but also a lot of negatives for small business ideas. After the 3rd round of investment the owner of the idea usually has lost control of their own idea.

I agree again, VC definitely got negative sides. For this reason I love the idea of ICO's so much, I just dislike that start-ups / blockchain projects raise way more than they need because this hurts the space overall and will likely force governments to step in at some point at last when the first class action law suits are filed. Hopefully the space will manage to come to reason itself. Time will tell.

Topic: 3 undervalued ICO's - page 5. (Read 2251 times)