Author

Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool - page 1105. (Read 4382648 times)

hero member
Activity: 696
Merit: 500
Slush what is the timeout when your considered to have dropped from the server and reconnected? Becuase I get dropouts for a second (in poclbm) that say unable to connect to server every once in a while, does the server think I am disconnecting/reconnecting? 
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 101
Hey Slush what are the odds of getting a btc/per hour average going off of our stats?

When logged in the graphs page should have your btc/per day shown, if you run 24/7 you can figure out your btc/per hour easy.
hero member
Activity: 696
Merit: 500
Hey Slush what are the odds of getting a btc/per hour average going off of our stats?
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Like I said color me gone
somebodys later share  isnt worth crap if didnt contribute first

bad day shit  it's been this way since slush changed his payout
per share was fair even with the possible cheating
THIS IS NOT

No, payouts/block went down significantly when the GHash/Sec being contributed nearly doubled, thus making your tiny portion less significant. But, that alone would still average to the same amount of payout per day or week since we'd be solving more blocks.

But, then the difficulty also adjusted upwards by ~40%. THAT is what has reduced your daily/weekly payout.

Quote
giving the last share more is not fair to those that got him there

You obviously don't understand how this works. This is like playing the lottery. The actions beforehand have ABSOLUTELY NO BEARING on the outcome of the next play. What you contributed early did absolutely nothing to increase the odds of somebody solving a block shortly there after.

And you also obviously know nothing about statistics and variance. Over time, you will average out to exactly the same total daily/weekly payout due to sometimes submitting shares at the beginning and sometimes submitting shares at the end. Look at the graphs that Slush posted when he made this change. They conclusively show that everything works out nearly exactly the same (except for severely punishing cheaters) over time.

ok I back off for a while
but i dissagree you are correct it's like the loto
EXCEPT in a pool
what part is done by each individual share contributes equally to finding the correct answer

or from your statement  no one result is any better than any other
Which is what i said later submissions should have no benefit over early submissions


oh dificulty went up
I've not see it...I'm seeing more shares contributed for less pay back
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
it's been this way since slush changed his payout per share was fair even with the possible cheating

Yes, the new scoring somewhat favors faster contributors (who will have a lower ratio of stale shares and a better chance of generating shares closer in time to the pool hitting) - But then, the entire BTC infrastructure favors horsepower over participation, so either take your few pennies a day, or go solo and pray that you ever hit a block within the next few years.  OR, start your own purely-proportional shared pool.  Simple as that.   Roll Eyes

Personally, even as a somewhat-penalized low-h/s contributor, I greatly appreciate what Slush has done for us by making it possible to generate any BTC at all without a high-powered GPU to throw at the task.



How is FAVORING any contributers fair
the faster they can hash is enough advantage
they get a bigger partial of the coins for more shares
screwing those that only contribute a few shares is hardly fair
especially because they got them early in the go
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Like I said color me gone
somebodys later share  isnt worth crap if didnt contribute first

bad day shit  it's been this way since slush changed his payout
per share was fair even with the possible cheating
THIS IS NOT

No, payouts/block went down significantly when the GHash/Sec being contributed nearly doubled, thus making your tiny portion less significant. But, that alone would still average to the same amount of payout per day or week since we'd be solving more blocks.

But, then the difficulty also adjusted upwards by ~40%. THAT is what has reduced your daily/weekly payout.

Quote
giving the last share more is not fair to those that got him there

You obviously don't understand how this works. This is like playing the lottery. The actions beforehand have ABSOLUTELY NO BEARING on the outcome of the next play. What you contributed early did absolutely nothing to increase the odds of somebody solving a block shortly there after.

And you also obviously know nothing about statistics and variance. Over time, you will average out to exactly the same total daily/weekly payout due to sometimes submitting shares at the beginning and sometimes submitting shares at the end. Look at the graphs that Slush posted when he made this change. They conclusively show that everything works out nearly exactly the same (except for severely punishing cheaters) over time.
pla
member
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
it's been this way since slush changed his payout per share was fair even with the possible cheating

Yes, the new scoring somewhat favors faster contributors (who will have a lower ratio of stale shares and a better chance of generating shares closer in time to the pool hitting) - But then, the entire BTC infrastructure favors horsepower over participation, so either take your few pennies a day, or go solo and pray that you ever hit a block within the next few years.  OR, start your own purely-proportional shared pool.  Simple as that.   Roll Eyes

Personally, even as a somewhat-penalized low-h/s contributor, I greatly appreciate what Slush has done for us by making it possible to generate any BTC at all without a high-powered GPU to throw at the task.

member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Like I said color me gone
somebodys later share  isnt worth crap if didnt contribute first

bad day shit  it's been this way since slush changed his payout
per share was fair even with the possible cheating
THIS IS NOT

giving the last share more is not fair to those that got him there
 
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
it seems that my payout has also dropped below what the difficulty increase should say

That's because yesterday was one of first day with higher difficulty and we also hit very bad day (see the round with almost half of million shares). Today we should be back near the expected reward. That's the life.
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
how can i have a fraction of a share Huh?

Oh, I think I finally understand.

Yes, you can have a "fraction of a share". Because pool reward calculating isn't share-based. As you have only tiny amount of hashpower in the pool, you have much higher variance every round. And finally, 2% of 50 BTC isnt 2 BTC.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 252
This new deal is supposed to be fair
Ya right
before i got a few pennies per round a coin or half coin in a week maybe more
now its imaginary   .001, .0009 , e-8  wait 2 days for .o1
Then wait hrs to get .1 coin in you wallet
Email says it's sent but another hr before it hits your wallet
Thats bs   7 shares for .ooo8 coin
How is that fair   
was better before

COLOR ME GONE
It sounds like you're CPU mining. I don't think you'll have any better luck mining alone. The odds of you finding a block in less than a year are not very good. Perhaps you exchange some fiat money for Bitcoin, or sell your goods or services instead of mining. You're pretty much guaranteed to be more successful than you would CPU mining.
sr. member
Activity: 411
Merit: 250
.00000209 coin pay out
39646 total shares

REALLY

that's BS
39646 shares contributed who is getting all the coins

not the shares even after deducting 2 for you

48/39646 is .0012107 NOT EVEN CLOSE to a full share
how can i have a fraction of a share Huh?

Somebody is getting a free ride
Who's Idea of fair is this
Send me some of what they were smokin

BobR, the payout is not a share based system any longer, but a score based system. The value of your share degrades the longer it is around, I think I've heard others say it is by 86.5% every 10 minutes. So it is very possible to have a payout that is a fraction of a share because you didn't submit any work for awhile before the round ended.

With that said, it seems that my payout has also dropped below what the difficulty increase should say, but I'm going to wait until I can compare my 7 day averages the period before the score system/difficulty increase and after, because I might just be having a run of bad luck atm.
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
Somebody is getting a free ride
Who's Idea of fair is this
Send me some of what they were smokin

Hey bobR, I see you're upset, but I don't have an idea what are you talking about?? Are you high?
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
.00000209 coin pay out
39646 total shares

REALLY

that's BS
39646 shares contributed who is getting all the coins

not the shares even after deducting 2 for you

48/39646 is .0012107 NOT EVEN CLOSE to a full share
how can i have a fraction of a share Huh?

Somebody is getting a free ride
Who's Idea of fair is this
Send me some of what they were smokin
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Oh and I thought the IMPOSED FEE
was reduced to 1%
as announced days ago
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
This new deal is supposed to be fair
Ya right
before i got a few pennies per round a coin or half coin in a week maybe more
now its imaginary   .001, .0009 , e-8  wait 2 days for .o1
Then wait hrs to get .1 coin in you wallet
Email says it's sent but another hr before it hits your wallet
Thats bs   7 shares for .ooo8 coin
How is that fair   
was better before

COLOR ME GONE
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
Hey guys, this is thread about pool, not about power consumption, cards, tuning of miners and so on ;-)
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
First off, I have a huge-ass tower with tons of fans and whatnot, I also have five hard disks so the base wattage is higher than the average PC.
I have 2 GTX470 so hopefully this will give some extra insight.


Base wattage: ~280W, 1 watt fluctuation
1 GPU, base clock: ~375W, 2 watts fluctuation, sometimes goes 10W lower for a split second (when it finds a block?)
1 GPU, overclocked: ~389W, same as above
2 GPU, base clock: ~540W, this one is weird, sometimes it goes ~530W and stays there for several seconds, other time it goes ~550W and stays there, but most of the times it's around 540W, 3 watts flunctuation
2 GPU, overclocked: ~585W, sometimes it likes to go all over the place (I've seen values from 510 to 620 watts)

Here are my khash rates:
1 GPU, base clock     ~77000 khash/sec
1 GPU, overclocked   ~93000 khash/sec
2 GPU, base clock   ~156000 khash/sec
2 GPU, overclocked ~185000 khash/sec

I use diablo miner so I disabled the second GPU in device manager, too much trouble removing a GPU for a 5 minute test...
Overclocking was done using EVGA Precision, didn't touch the memory clock (doesn't seem to make a difference to mining) and raised the core clock value from 607MHz to 755 MHz, something of note: playing games with this clock will crash my system.

I read this thread about 2 or 3 times a day, so I might take a while to answer any of the specifics. I also won't be here today for the whole day (I'm about to leave). I hope this helps anyone.
pla
member
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
first you need to subtract 168W that rest of the system uses (if you don't run your pc 24/7 then adjust it properly) and remember to subtract another 50W that 5970 uses in idle anyway then you need to guess how much is actually used when mining with full speed - that could be another 50W less than when gaming

... For the times you would have had your PC on anyway.

For the other 16+ hours a day, you have to consider the full power consumption as something you wouldn't have used if not for mining.

However, purely for measuring MH/W, it surprises me that no one has actually measured the change in draw directly, for the most common cards at least.  Just hook your PC to a Kill-A-Watt, get a baseline reading, then start the CUDA/CL miner and see how it changes.  It seems like a fairly critical deciding factor in actual mining efficiency, since as TEOTWAWKI pointed out, the upper limit can run you over a grand a year in electricity.

If anyone wants to donate a 5970 to me (or any other high-end cards), I'll gladly measure it and update the wiki.   Grin
full member
Activity: 170
Merit: 100
overclocked 5970 = 476 watt/per hour x 24 hours x 365 days = 4169760 / 1000 = 4169,76 kWh per year x 0,3 dollar =  $1250,93 per year

The electricity cost is based on dutch electricity included tax and transport cost (1kWh = around $0,30).

A 5970 would cost $3,43 per day on electricity extra on my electricity bill. This doesn't sound much per day, but per year its $1250,93 extra on my elec bill.

http://bit.ly/gb5XJp

it is not 476 watt

first you need to subtract 168W that rest of the system uses (if you don't run your pc 24/7 then adjust it properly) and remember to subtract another 50W that 5970 uses in idle anyway

then you need to guess how much is actually used when mining with full speed - that could be another 50W less than when gaming
Jump to: