[4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool - page 586.

gourmet

sr. member

Activity: 311

Merit: 250

Quote from: jarhed on July 31, 2013, 06:12:57 AM

Quote from: d20_9999 on July 31, 2013, 05:47:42 AM

Rookie question:

I have 9 of the Block Erupter USB sticks hashing all on the same rig, which averages about 3 Gh/s. Should I set the difficulty for the worker to 2, since the total hashing power is over 2 Gh/s, or should I keep it at one, since each stick only has 335 Mh/s of power?

Keep at 1, else endless discarded.

?
I've always believed that the rig should behave like one worker with combined power. Is there any reason for discarded shares other than bad configuration/setting?

aurel57

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1001

Quote from: gravitate on August 03, 2013, 04:52:19 AM

ps i am a noob. Do my stats look normal?

Name   ID   Temp   MH/s   Accept   Reject   Error   Utility   Last Share Time
AMU   0   0   335.66   258   0   35   0.29   21:03:55
AMU   1   0   335.72   269   1   54   0.3   21:11:22
AMU   2   0   335.57   266   1   32   0.3   21:10:29
AMU   3   0   335.98   281   2   34   0.31   21:10:37
AMU   4   0   335.71   245   0   39   0.27   21:07:18
AMU   5   0   335.93   269   0   45   0.3   21:11:54
AMU   6   0   335.95   269   1   45   0.3   21:11:50
AMU   7   0   335.72   256   1   42   0.28   21:10:09
AMU   8   0   335.77   252   0   40   0.28   21:07:05
AMU   9   0   348.97   22   2   1922   0.02   21:06:55
AMU   10   0   335.97   261   0   42   0.29   21:12:26
AMU   11   0   335.57   248   1   46   0.28   21:12:40
Totals   12      4042.52   2896   9   2376   3.22

I take it you have USB Eruptors? what kind of hub are you using? Port 9 is way off...if the power supply is right and cooling I only see less than 1% error on mine. So all yours seem to have a high error rate and like I said port 9 is way off.

I also hope #19421 gets fixed.

gravitate

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

ps i am a noob. Do my stats look normal?

Name   ID   Temp   MH/s   Accept   Reject   Error   Utility   Last Share Time
AMU   0   0   335.66   258   0   35   0.29   21:03:55
AMU   1   0   335.72   269   1   54   0.3   21:11:22
AMU   2   0   335.57   266   1   32   0.3   21:10:29
AMU   3   0   335.98   281   2   34   0.31   21:10:37
AMU   4   0   335.71   245   0   39   0.27   21:07:18
AMU   5   0   335.93   269   0   45   0.3   21:11:54
AMU   6   0   335.95   269   1   45   0.3   21:11:50
AMU   7   0   335.72   256   1   42   0.28   21:10:09
AMU   8   0   335.77   252   0   40   0.28   21:07:05
AMU   9   0   348.97   22   2   1922   0.02   21:06:55
AMU   10   0   335.97   261   0   42   0.29   21:12:26
AMU   11   0   335.57   248   1   46   0.28   21:12:40
Totals   12      4042.52   2896   9   2376   3.22

chunglam

donator

Activity: 229

Merit: 106

Quote from: angryrob on August 03, 2013, 04:00:00 AM

hmmm 19425 fixed and normal for me now.

wonder what is up with 19421. I'd almost say it was just my own bad luck (variance) but so many other people also posted about it. oh well, i'm not ganna sweat about 1 round being a bit low.

19419 was invalid tho? just noticed this. super bummer. i had a pretty nice reward on that one too lol

Same here for #19421, only 60% of average reward per round and my connection to pool for that round should be same as usual.

19421 2013-08-03 01:52:48 7:09:54 160946644 265926 0.02419936 249905 25.17464593 43 confirmations left

gravitate

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

Name   ID   Temp   MH/s   Accept   Reject   Error   Utility   Last Share Time
AMU   0   0   335.66   258   0   35   0.29   21:03:55
AMU   1   0   335.72   269   1   54   0.3   21:11:22
AMU   2   0   335.57   266   1   32   0.3   21:10:29
AMU   3   0   335.98   281   2   34   0.31   21:10:37
AMU   4   0   335.71   245   0   39   0.27   21:07:18
AMU   5   0   335.93   269   0   45   0.3   21:11:54
AMU   6   0   335.95   269   1   45   0.3   21:11:50
AMU   7   0   335.72   256   1   42   0.28   21:10:09
AMU   8   0   335.77   252   0   40   0.28   21:07:05
AMU   9   0   348.97   22   2   1922   0.02   21:06:55
AMU   10   0   335.97   261   0   42   0.29   21:12:26
AMU   11   0   335.57   248   1   46   0.28   21:12:40
Totals   12      4042.52   2896   9   2376   3.22

I seem to be getting a lot of errors. Is this normal?

angryrob

sr. member

Activity: 287

Merit: 250

hmmm 19425 fixed and normal for me now.

wonder what is up with 19421. I'd almost say it was just my own bad luck (variance) but so many other people also posted about it. oh well, i'm not ganna sweat about 1 round being a bit low.

19419 was invalid tho? just noticed this. super bummer. i had a pretty nice reward on that one too lol

kabopar

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Quote from: willinliv on August 03, 2013, 03:32:52 AM

Quote from: drewage on August 02, 2013, 09:36:37 PM

Anybody thinking this block is a little light?

19421 2013-08-03 01:52:48 7:09:54 160946644 22010 0.00193569 249905 25.17464593 92 confirmations left

I think I lucked out with that one - highest earnings on a single round so far for me! Thank you for your donations:

19423   2013-08-03 06:15:47   2:28:32   54379598   4192   0.00211264   249940   25.44683309    86 confirmations left
19422   2013-08-03 03:47:15   1:54:27   42104601   3140   0.00178380   249923   25.05371000    69 confirmations left
19421   2013-08-03 01:52:48   7:09:54   160946644   11999   0.00971988   249905   25.17464593    51 confirmations left
19420   2013-08-02 18:42:54   0:02:03   759065   68   0.00217892   249855   25.08682056    1 confirmations left

at least someone benefits from our losses.... Grin

angryrob

sr. member

Activity: 287

Merit: 250

my score reset right before 19425 ended, hoping that one and 19421 both get a recalc before they are confirmed.

willinliv

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

Quote from: drewage on August 02, 2013, 09:36:37 PM

Anybody thinking this block is a little light?

19421 2013-08-03 01:52:48 7:09:54 160946644 22010 0.00193569 249905 25.17464593 92 confirmations left

I think I lucked out with that one - highest earnings on a single round so far for me! Thank you for your donations:

19423   2013-08-03 06:15:47   2:28:32   54379598   4192   0.00211264   249940   25.44683309    86 confirmations left
19422   2013-08-03 03:47:15   1:54:27   42104601   3140   0.00178380   249923   25.05371000    69 confirmations left
19421   2013-08-03 01:52:48   7:09:54   160946644   11999   0.00971988   249905   25.17464593    51 confirmations left
19420   2013-08-02 18:42:54   0:02:03   759065   68   0.00217892   249855   25.08682056    1 confirmations left

eleuthria

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1007

Quote from: NoDisco on August 03, 2013, 02:57:11 AM

Quote from: eleuthria on August 02, 2013, 06:09:38 PM

Variance is big, even for large pools. Also...your data from BTC Guild is significantly out of order.

How is it out of order? The times are in the order when the blocks finish.

I looked over the last 100 blocks and there was only 1 block out of 100 that took over 1 hour to be found. So the variance seems very small to me - they have multiple blocks finishing per hour all day long.

It looks like you clicked the date/time column to sort for your copy+paste. The sorting on the column isn't aware of context (notice the switching between AM and PM on the timestamps). Sort by block ID to get the proper order. BTC Guild has long blocks daily (I would know, I run it). The difference is, a LONG block for BTC Guild is ~2 hours. An abnormally unlucky round (something you would only expect to see every 500-1000 blocks) would be 4 hours.

NoDisco

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: eleuthria on August 02, 2013, 06:09:38 PM

Variance is big, even for large pools. Also...your data from BTC Guild is significantly out of order.

How is it out of order? The times are in the order when the blocks finish.

I looked over the last 100 blocks and there was only 1 block out of 100 that took over 1 hour to be found. So the variance seems very small to me - they have multiple blocks finishing per hour all day long.

bigbeninlondon

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

That's my third low block today. First one got fixed just before confirmation; second on is height 249854, although that one may have seen some downtime on my miners. Either way, bummer to see 3x in one day.

bspurloc

hero member

Activity: 569

Merit: 500

19421 2013-08-03 01:52:48 7:09:54 160946644 25325 0.00213075 249905 25.17464593 86 confirmations left

yeah totally wrong

angryrob

sr. member

Activity: 287

Merit: 250

yep, light on my end too. hope it gets a recalc sometime.

hope we get some freakin better luck sometime too... lol

bitzip

newbie

Activity: 53

Merit: 0

Quote from: drewage on August 02, 2013, 09:36:37 PM

Anybody thinking this block is a little light?

19421 2013-08-03 01:52:48 7:09:54 160946644 22010 0.00193569 249905 25.17464593 92 confirmations left

It seems light to me also. Almost half what I usually average.

thebrit

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Make the Bitcoin, don't let the Bitcoin make you.

Quote from: drewage on August 02, 2013, 09:36:37 PM

Anybody thinking this block is a little light?

19421 2013-08-03 01:52:48 7:09:54 160946644 22010 0.00193569 249905 25.17464593 92 confirmations left

Concur:

19421 2013-08-03 01:52:48 7:09:54 160946644 3904704 0.34637969 249905 25.17464593 90 confirmations left

This is half the production of my previous 20 blocks... and the estimated reward for the next block ....

anyone?

drewage

member

Activity: 262

Merit: 10

Anybody thinking this block is a little light?

19421 2013-08-03 01:52:48 7:09:54 160946644 22010 0.00193569 249905 25.17464593 92 confirmations left

Trongersoll

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 501

Quote from: bigbeninlondon on August 02, 2013, 06:38:11 PM

Quote from: eleuthria on August 02, 2013, 06:09:38 PM

Quote from: NoDisco on August 02, 2013, 06:00:55 PM

How comes BTC are only 3 times bigger, yet find a massive order of magnitude more blocks more regularly?

Variance is big, even for large pools. Also...your data from BTC Guild is significantly out of order. BTC Guild's average block solve time is ~30-45 minutes. Slush's is ~2 hours (doing rough math).

That is *average* time. Both pools have rounds lasting seconds/a few minutes, or multiple hours.

Slush for the last month has averaged about 1:23:04 per block. The last 14 days has been about 1:25:09. Just FYI; I keep track.

good to know, long blocks are just frustrating.

bigbeninlondon

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Quote from: eleuthria on August 02, 2013, 06:09:38 PM

Quote from: NoDisco on August 02, 2013, 06:00:55 PM

How comes BTC are only 3 times bigger, yet find a massive order of magnitude more blocks more regularly?

Variance is big, even for large pools. Also...your data from BTC Guild is significantly out of order. BTC Guild's average block solve time is ~30-45 minutes. Slush's is ~2 hours (doing rough math).

That is *average* time. Both pools have rounds lasting seconds/a few minutes, or multiple hours.

Slush for the last month has averaged about 1:23:04 per block. The last 14 days has been about 1:25:09. Just FYI; I keep track.

eleuthria

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1007

Quote from: NoDisco on August 02, 2013, 06:00:55 PM

How comes BTC are only 3 times bigger, yet find a massive order of magnitude more blocks more regularly?

Variance is big, even for large pools. Also...your data from BTC Guild is significantly out of order. BTC Guild's average block solve time is ~30-45 minutes. Slush's is ~2 hours (doing rough math).

That is *average* time. Both pools have rounds lasting seconds/a few minutes, or multiple hours.

Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool - page 586. (Read 4382714 times)