Author

Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool - page 856. (Read 4382653 times)

hero member
Activity: 507
Merit: 500
I'm having trouble connecting with poclbm. It works sometimes so I know it's not me. In fact, I have a miner running connected right now. When I try and start them up, it's hit or miss. At one point, I had all three miners up but seem to be hitting a run of bad luck on getting two of them up. Symptom is, it reports "no response to getwork, using as stratum" (as it should) then "Failed to subscribe".

pings to stratum.bitcoin.cz complete 100%.

Is there something I'm missing?

I am also getting this every now and there/
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 2267
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
Hmm. Just got #2 up then had a power glitch and restarted and now seem to be able to connect every time. Maybe it was me. Strange though.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 2267
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
I'm having trouble connecting with poclbm. It works sometimes so I know it's not me. In fact, I have a miner running connected right now. When I try and start them up, it's hit or miss. At one point, I had all three miners up but seem to be hitting a run of bad luck on getting two of them up. Symptom is, it reports "no response to getwork, using as stratum" (as it should) then "Failed to subscribe".

pings to stratum.bitcoin.cz complete 100%.

Is there something I'm missing?
sr. member
Activity: 473
Merit: 250
Sodium hypochlorite, acetone, ethanol
Slush have you considered implementing LTC mining pool? There are lot's of graphic cards out there soon to be obsolete...

I considered that, but I'm not a fan of alternative currencies (except the namecoin, which is dead), so I have no plans for litecoin support.

When there'll be a currency which will bring some innovations comparing to bitcoin, I'll consider the support. I don't think litecoin fullfil this condition.


what do you think about devcoin? (maybe you can earn some devcoins with the Trezor project Wink )  
full member
Activity: 149
Merit: 100

Can someone explain how average hashrate is calculated?  And why does guiminer report that I'm receiving 20-30 Mhash's more than what this says?

It looks like at the moment you are running at about 840Mhash/s.  So average hashrate is the last ten rounds combined.  So if you have been using that same hashrate since you started mining it would been that about 6 of those 10 rounds you have been mining 840 Mhash/s.  Note this is only a guestimate.  It's like saying I am currently running at 100Mhash/s and have always done that.  But I only did it for five of the last 10 rounds so my average hashrate would be 50 Mhash/s.  If you stay steady at the 840 for ten rounds then it should show an average hashrate of 840.
hero member
Activity: 674
Merit: 500


Can someone explain how average hashrate is calculated?  And why does guiminer report that I'm receiving 20-30 Mhash's more than what this says?
member
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
I had performance issues with website yesterday, so I limit it to 5 records temporary. Profile page is one of the most loaded page on the site.
Ofc, Profile page is most important page and if there are some "page" system, then we (all users, who have 20+ profile) needs to do double(+) check.
But 20 is better than 5 ...
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
Hi Slush,

I got 2 workers running on the pool and it seems like for some rounds one of the workers shares are not reflected in a block shares. Could there be some glitch or bug in block processing?


legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
I had performance issues with website yesterday, so I limit it to 5 records temporary. Profile page is one of the most loaded page on the site.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
5 workers per "my account" page?
Very bad to watch workers status. If this load highly site, make some "spoil" or smth, but page system is very unhandy.

I think  Wink

+1 Return please to the last stat.
member
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
5 workers per "my account" page?
Very bad to watch workers status. If this load highly site, make some "spoil" or smth, but page system is very unhandy.

I think  Wink

+1 Return please to the last stat.
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
5 workers per "my account" page?
Very bad to watch workers status. If this load highly site, make some "spoil" or smth, but page system is very unhandy.

I think  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
I disabled block processing, I'm doing site maintenance. Pool will process blocks in few minutes.
hero member
Activity: 622
Merit: 500
www.cryptobetfair.com
I'll think about it. I still don't see the advantage of LTC, except mining speculation.


I agree. No need.  There are lots of ltc pools people can choose from if they feel so inclined. I like LTC, but LTC brings nothing new to the table worth all this fuss.  NMC support I think is justified, it may be dying, but it at least does something different/new, and the merged mining costs us nothing but time to set it up.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 504
Dream become broken often

There's no fee.

Great!

I was also wondering if people that are solving the block are receiving extra award or they are treated as any other miner during the round?

no extra reward, just the warm fuzzy feeling you helped everyone get btc, including yourself Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
I'll think about it. I still don't see the advantage of LTC, except mining speculation.
sr. member
Activity: 298
Merit: 250
Watch this:

http://www.ltc-charts.com/period-charts.php?period=3-months&resolution=day&pair=ltc-btc&market=btc-e
(be patient it takes about 5 seconds for the chart to display)

mining LTC is now 5.35 times more profitable than mining BTC. Temporary, I'm sure of that... but..

slush - maybe it wouldn't be too much hassle for you to duplicate a whole single server on another IP and run litecoin on the backend. So that we could mine LTCs on your server instead of mining on some random pools?
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
Is it the server or an issue on my end?

This one was a glitch on server side, it's fine now.
Jump to: