I'm wondering if bitcoin will survive this weekend at $400
Bitcoin has been swinging up and down between $400 - $420
Topic: $400 will not survive the weekend - page 5. (Read 10263 times)
Bitcoin is going to survive it is not like we are going to just going down and stay there.
Bitcoin is just like a roller coaster that can survive going up and up or down and up again.
I hope this weekend we will reach at 450 dollars that would be great.
Bitcoin is just like a roller coaster that can survive going up and up or down and up again.
I hope this weekend we will reach at 450 dollars that would be great.
I am happy to see the price above 400 again.
It's mandatory we go not down 400 if we want to see a 800 value this year.
It's mandatory we go not down 400 if we want to see a 800 value this year.
Well is just beter to see bitcoin going up than going down.
I think we will see this year a 800 dollars for bitcoin after the halving maybe.
It will be great if it is before the halving thn is really nice for us.
I am happy to see the price above 400 again.
It's mandatory we go not down 400 if we want to see a 800 value this year.
It's mandatory we go not down 400 if we want to see a 800 value this year.
Yeah bitcoin have gone to 350 dollars but now is back to 400 dollars that is good.
But I am sad that is up now is so expensive to buy :/
But I am sad that is up now is so expensive to buy :/
i always see people complain about the price being too high. why didn't you buy when the price was crashing? it was a fantastic moment to buy, but still people are waiting.... next time when you see the price is tanking, make sure you don't miss that opportunity to enter the market.
The price will be above $400 when the week closes and I hope it will rise to $500 in February 
after these bad news start to disapear, i think the price will be stable again between 400:450 levels
and if the price break 460 level , it MAY reach 500 in February
The price will be above $400 when the week closes and I hope it will rise to $500 in February
Yeah bitcoin have gone to 350 dollars but now is back to 400 dollars that is good.
But I am sad that is up now is so expensive to buy :/
But I am sad that is up now is so expensive to buy :/
$400 survived past weekend and now the price is going above $450 and it is increasing +6-7% until now.
Yeah i agree we should have the price increase more slowly and regulated.
This price jumps scares people too much.
The price rose over 10% yesterday. There is news that Chinese government is going to issue digital currency in near future.
Which analysis show you this breakdown ?
It will be a massive blow for buyers
I would also like to see your source of this information.If btc price falls,most of us will buy heavily which will make price go up againIt will be a massive blow for buyers
Yeah but i suspect if the whales are selling all of us don't have enough money to avoid a price decline.
As this moment there is just too much money involved.
If small fish like us all buy 1 bitcoin, that is enough to absorb all the selling from the big whales.
Which analysis show you this breakdown ?
It will be a massive blow for buyers
I would also like to see your source of this information.If btc price falls,most of us will buy heavily which will make price go up againIt will be a massive blow for buyers
Yeah but i suspect if the whales are selling all of us don't have enough money to avoid a price decline.
As this moment there is just too much money involved.
Which analysis show you this breakdown ?
It will be a massive blow for buyers
I would also like to see your source of this information.If btc price falls,most of us will buy heavily which will make price go up again It will be a massive blow for buyers
$400 survived past weekend and now the price is going above $450 and it is increasing +6-7% until now.
Yeah i agree we should have the price increase more slowly and regulated.
This price jumps scares people too much.
Why you do not like the fast increase in bitcoin ?
Because fast increase means heavy drop and long long bear market because so many people get burned and run away from crypto.
That is the reason I do not like fast rise. If the price rose 100% instead of 1500% in 2013, we would not have 2 years of bear market.
I find this argument weak. If price would only rise 100% in 2013, then 100% in 2014, then 100% in 2015, it would be only $96 vs $455 right now.
I prefer $455, but that's me.
what? this is completely wrong, the price was $90 before the 1200 ath, so if it rise 100 in 2013 instead of going to 1200, it would be $180 in 2013 only
then $360 in 2014, and $720 in 2015...
you should factor-in the price that there was before the pump for the last ath started, not the initial price of 2013
No, YOU are wrong; he was saying IF price would only go up 100% in 2013, there never was any word about $90.
Check the graph. On Jan 1 2013, price was $13.20
http://www.investing.com/currencies/btc-usd-historical-data
So, according to him (and you), by Jan 2014 it would be $26.4, then by Jan 2015 $52.8 and by Jan 2016 $105.16
$90 was the previous price before the 1200 ath started, i know because i was watching themarket and suddenly the pump initiated
and why the hell you refer to your self as "he", it's your post man...
I refer to "him" because "he" or 'she" proposed that we would be better off with 100% rise/year, so it is his/hers calculation (and yours since you were defending it), not mine.
I am still at a loss why we should start counting 2013 advance form $90 when the year began at $13-is it where you start watching it (at $90) ?
My general point is it is BETTER for the price to have huge bubbles, followed by bear markets than just chugging along linearly.
check the graph, it was around september, then the price has gone above 100-120 and then the huge pump started
OK, got it; you're right in what you described, but i was talking about the whole 2013.
Why you do not like the fast increase in bitcoin ?
Because fast increase means heavy drop and long long bear market because so many people get burned and run away from crypto.
That is the reason I do not like fast rise. If the price rose 100% instead of 1500% in 2013, we would not have 2 years of bear market.
I find this argument weak. If price would only rise 100% in 2013, then 100% in 2014, then 100% in 2015, it would be only $96 vs $455 right now.
I prefer $455, but that's me.
what? this is completely wrong, the price was $90 before the 1200 ath, so if it rise 100 in 2013 instead of going to 1200, it would be $180 in 2013 only
then $360 in 2014, and $720 in 2015...
you should factor-in the price that there was before the pump for the last ath started, not the initial price of 2013
No, YOU are wrong; he was saying IF price would only go up 100% in 2013, there never was any word about $90.
Check the graph. On Jan 1 2013, price was $13.20
http://www.investing.com/currencies/btc-usd-historical-data
So, according to him (and you), by Jan 2014 it would be $26.4, then by Jan 2015 $52.8 and by Jan 2016 $105.16
$90 was the previous price before the 1200 ath started, i know because i was watching themarket and suddenly the pump initiated
and why the hell you refer to your self as "he", it's your post man...
I refer to "him" because "he" or 'she" proposed that we would be better off with 100% rise/year, so it is his/hers calculation (and yours since you were defending it), not mine.
I am still at a loss why we should start counting 2013 advance form $90 when the year began at $13-is it where you start watching it (at $90) ?
My general point is it is BETTER for the price to have huge bubbles, followed by bear markets than just chugging along linearly.
check the graph, it was around september, then the price went above 100-120 and then the huge pump started
Why you do not like the fast increase in bitcoin ?
Because fast increase means heavy drop and long long bear market because so many people get burned and run away from crypto.
That is the reason I do not like fast rise. If the price rose 100% instead of 1500% in 2013, we would not have 2 years of bear market.
I find this argument weak. If price would only rise 100% in 2013, then 100% in 2014, then 100% in 2015, it would be only $96 vs $455 right now.
I prefer $455, but that's me.
what? this is completely wrong, the price was $90 before the 1200 ath, so if it rise 100 in 2013 instead of going to 1200, it would be $180 in 2013 only
then $360 in 2014, and $720 in 2015...
you should factor-in the price that there was before the pump for the last ath started, not the initial price of 2013
No, YOU are wrong; he was saying IF price would only go up 100% in 2013, there never was any word about $90.
Check the graph. On Jan 1 2013, price was $13.20
http://www.investing.com/currencies/btc-usd-historical-data
So, according to him (and you), by Jan 2014 it would be $26.4, then by Jan 2015 $52.8 and by Jan 2016 $105.16
$90 was the previous price before the 1200 ath started, i know because i was watching themarket and suddenly the pump initiated
and why the hell you refer to your self as "he", it's your post man...
I refer to "him" because "he" or 'she" proposed that we would be better off with 100% rise/year, so it is his/hers calculation (and yours since you were defending it), not mine.
I am still at a loss why we should start counting 2013 advance form $90 when the year began at $13-is it where you start watching it (at $90) ?
My general point is it is BETTER for the price to have huge bubbles, followed by bear markets than just chugging along linearly.
Why you do not like the fast increase in bitcoin ?
Because fast increase means heavy drop and long long bear market because so many people get burned and run away from crypto.
That is the reason I do not like fast rise. If the price rose 100% instead of 1500% in 2013, we would not have 2 years of bear market.
I find this argument weak. If price would only rise 100% in 2013, then 100% in 2014, then 100% in 2015, it would be only $96 vs $455 right now.
I prefer $455, but that's me.
what? this is completely wrong, the price was $90 before the 1200 ath, so if it rise 100 in 2013 instead of going to 1200, it would be $180 in 2013 only
then $360 in 2014, and $720 in 2015...
you should factor-in the price that there was before the pump for the last ath started, not the initial price of 2013
No, YOU are wrong; he was saying IF price would only go up 100% in 2013, there never was any word about $90.
Check the graph. On Jan 1 2013, price was $13.20
http://www.investing.com/currencies/btc-usd-historical-data
So, according to him (and you), by Jan 2014 it would be $26.4, then by Jan 2015 $52.8 and by Jan 2016 $105.16
$90 was the previous price before the 1200 ath started, i know because i was watching themarket and suddenly the pump initiated
and why the hell you refer to your self as "he", it's your post man...
Why you do not like the fast increase in bitcoin ?
Because fast increase means heavy drop and long long bear market because so many people get burned and run away from crypto.
That is the reason I do not like fast rise. If the price rose 100% instead of 1500% in 2013, we would not have 2 years of bear market.
I find this argument weak. If price would only rise 100% in 2013, then 100% in 2014, then 100% in 2015, it would be only $96 vs $455 right now.
I prefer $455, but that's me.
what? this is completely wrong, the price was $90 before the 1200 ath, so if it rise 100 in 2013 instead of going to 1200, it would be $180 in 2013 only
then $360 in 2014, and $720 in 2015...
you should factor-in the price that there was before the pump for the last ath started, not the initial price of 2013
No, YOU are wrong; he was saying IF price would only go up 100% in 2013, there never was any word about $90.
Check the graph. On Jan 1 2013, price was $13.20
http://www.investing.com/currencies/btc-usd-historical-data
So, according to him (and you), by Jan 2014 it would be $26.4, then by Jan 2015 $52.8 and by Jan 2016 $105.16
Why you do not like the fast increase in bitcoin ?
Because fast increase means heavy drop and long long bear market because so many people get burned and run away from crypto.
That is the reason I do not like fast rise. If the price rose 100% instead of 1500% in 2013, we would not have 2 years of bear market.
I find this argument weak. If price would only rise 100% in 2013, then 100% in 2014, then 100% in 2015, it would be only $96 vs $455 right now.
I prefer $455, but that's me.
what? this is completely wrong, the price was $90 before the 1200 ath, so if it rise 100 in 2013 instead of going to 1200, it would be $180 in 2013 only
then $360 in 2014, and $720 in 2015...
you should factor-in the price that there was before the pump for the last ath started, not the initial price of 2013
Why you do not like the fast increase in bitcoin ?
Because fast increase means heavy drop and long long bear market because so many people get burned and run away from crypto.
That is the reason I do not like fast rise. If the price rose 100% instead of 1500% in 2013, we would not have 2 years of bear market.
I find this argument weak. If price would only rise 100% in 2013, then 100% in 2014, then 100% in 2015, it would be only $96 vs $455 right now.
I prefer $455, but that's me.
Jump to: