Pages:
Author

Topic: 45ghz $199 "supercomputer" - page 2. (Read 11576 times)

hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Bitbuy
October 25, 2012, 10:41:21 AM
#18
Does anyone still trust kickstarter?


I was just thinking the same thing.  Kickstarter has about a year left before it starts to implode due to people losing all trust with them.  Unless they do a better job of vetting what gets up there, noone will want to use it anymore.

What did they do that would cause people not to trust them? I haven't heard about kickstarter until now, so I don't have a clue, but on the outside it sounds like a very cool way to get funding for projects like these.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
October 25, 2012, 08:23:29 AM
#17
Does anyone still trust kickstarter?


I was just thinking the same thing.  Kickstarter has about a year left before it starts to implode due to people losing all trust with them.  Unless they do a better job of vetting what gets up there, noone will want to use it anymore.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Bitbuy
October 25, 2012, 04:24:26 AM
#16
Sounds like a fun supercomputer project. How well would this perform compared to say a quadcore ivy bridge processor on perfectly threadable workloads?
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1721
October 25, 2012, 04:23:13 AM
#15
Damn, half a million is already a lot, it would be nice if someone with a quarter of a million appeared now.  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
October 25, 2012, 04:18:05 AM
#14
they are near $500k and 2 more days to go!
i don't see how the $750k will be reached unless a "big fish"
awakes the last moment Cheesy

I think if they showed more practical uses for it they would make the funding
hero member
Activity: 607
Merit: 500
October 25, 2012, 02:26:09 AM
#13
they are near $500k and 2 more days to go!
i don't see how the $750k will be reached unless a "big fish"
awakes the last moment Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1008
October 15, 2012, 05:33:14 PM
#12
Once multi-threaded signature verification becomes standard in the Satoshi client, one of these $99 boards (given they reach their target) might be able to verify enough transactions per second to maintain the block chain if/when transaction volumes start reaching high levels. That's pretty cool for a $99 computer.
kjj
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1025
October 15, 2012, 12:24:29 PM
#11
800 MHz times 64 cores is 51,200,000,000 instructions per second.

SHA-256 takes about 3000 instructions per round, and has 64 rounds, so 192,000 instructions per hash.

Gives about 266 kilohashes per second, per chip.  Not great for mining.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
October 12, 2012, 12:54:57 AM
#10
Seems interesting. They are essentially cutting an AVNet ZedBoard down from $395 to $99 with their own daughter boards.

The chip on the daughter board has some nice specs:
Quote
    64 High Performance RISC CPU Cores
    800 MHz Operating Frequency
    100 GFLOPS Sustained Performance
    1638 GB/s Local Memory Bandwidth
    102 GB/s Network-On-Chip Bisection Bandwidth
    6.4 GB/s Off-Chip Bandwidth
    2 MB On-Chip Distributed Shared Memory
    2 Watt Maximum Chip Power Consumption
    IEEE Floating Point Instruction Set
    Fully-featured ANSI-C/C++ programmable
    GNU/Eclipse based tool chain
    Source synchronous LVDS off chip links for host or direct chip-to-chip interfacing.
    Chip to chip links for integrating up to 64 chips on a single board
    324-ball 15x15mm flip-chip BGA
Source: http://www.adapteva.com/products/silicon-devices/e64g401/


It doesn't look good for the kickstarter (they need $750 000 and only have $200 000 so far) - I hope it goes through.

I agree, it doesn't look so good right now. Do you think they'll get a boost from releasing their documents (which occurred today, I believe)?

They are up to $300k now.

Interestingly check out their survey responses - some people are wanting it for Bitcoin:

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/adapteva/parallella-a-supercomputer-for-everyone/posts
full member
Activity: 246
Merit: 100
October 12, 2012, 12:01:01 AM
#9
Would you want something back if youinvested in a company? I would, why invest if tthat doesnt happen?
If there is a possiblblty woudt happen I would be better off keepin my 100K a year income in alow intrest
savings.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
October 11, 2012, 11:11:36 PM
#8
Does anyone still trust kickstarter?


Since they've clarified,

"Kickstarter does not guarantee projects or investigate a creator's ability to complete their project. It is the responsibility of the project creator to complete their project as promised, and the claims of this project are theirs alone."
http://www.kickstarter.com/help/faq/kickstarter%20basics#Acco

So, there is little reason to trust anyone. Although later on the same page, they do state that the creators agree to some type of obligation to deliver rewards or offer refunds to backers.

I'm surprised by how quickly it has evolved into a purchasing-oriented rather than donation-oriented system, but people tend to prefer tangible rewards if offered, I suppose.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Portland Bitcoin Group Organizer
October 07, 2012, 10:49:13 PM
#7
Does anyone still trust kickstarter?
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
October 07, 2012, 10:16:51 PM
#6
Seems interesting. They are essentially cutting an AVNet ZedBoard down from $395 to $99 with their own daughter boards.

The chip on the daughter board has some nice specs:
Quote
    64 High Performance RISC CPU Cores
    800 MHz Operating Frequency
    100 GFLOPS Sustained Performance
    1638 GB/s Local Memory Bandwidth
    102 GB/s Network-On-Chip Bisection Bandwidth
    6.4 GB/s Off-Chip Bandwidth
    2 MB On-Chip Distributed Shared Memory
    2 Watt Maximum Chip Power Consumption
    IEEE Floating Point Instruction Set
    Fully-featured ANSI-C/C++ programmable
    GNU/Eclipse based tool chain
    Source synchronous LVDS off chip links for host or direct chip-to-chip interfacing.
    Chip to chip links for integrating up to 64 chips on a single board
    324-ball 15x15mm flip-chip BGA
Source: http://www.adapteva.com/products/silicon-devices/e64g401/


It doesn't look good for the kickstarter (they need $750 000 and only have $200 000 so far) - I hope it goes through.

I agree, it doesn't look so good right now. Do you think they'll get a boost from releasing their documents (which occurred today, I believe)?
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
October 07, 2012, 06:40:33 PM
#5
Seems interesting. They are essentially cutting an AVNet ZedBoard down from $395 to $99 with their own daughter boards.

The chip on the daughter board has some nice specs:
Quote
    64 High Performance RISC CPU Cores
    800 MHz Operating Frequency
    100 GFLOPS Sustained Performance
    1638 GB/s Local Memory Bandwidth
    102 GB/s Network-On-Chip Bisection Bandwidth
    6.4 GB/s Off-Chip Bandwidth
    2 MB On-Chip Distributed Shared Memory
    2 Watt Maximum Chip Power Consumption
    IEEE Floating Point Instruction Set
    Fully-featured ANSI-C/C++ programmable
    GNU/Eclipse based tool chain
    Source synchronous LVDS off chip links for host or direct chip-to-chip interfacing.
    Chip to chip links for integrating up to 64 chips on a single board
    324-ball 15x15mm flip-chip BGA
Source: http://www.adapteva.com/products/silicon-devices/e64g401/


It doesn't look good for the kickstarter (they need $750 000 and only have $200 000 so far) - I hope it goes through.
hero member
Activity: 607
Merit: 500
October 07, 2012, 05:07:40 PM
#4
great for ltc and sc mining Wink
member
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
October 02, 2012, 07:25:42 PM
#3
for mining not,
but for rendering video/images sure mega!

Mhm, it has opencl support for the 64 risc cores, should be good for something Wink
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
October 02, 2012, 07:21:13 PM
#2
for mining not,
but for rendering video/images sure mega!
member
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
October 02, 2012, 07:14:49 PM
#1
Anyone had a look at this

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/adapteva/parallella-a-supercomputer-for-everyone

Is it suited for bitcoin mining ?
Pages:
Jump to: