Topic: 5 Things Successful ICOs Have in Common. - page 2. (Read 487 times)
Successful ICO have good marketing plan in theres a fund to use in it pay vlogger have many news article even it is paid and of course has a legit company partner . unlike shit ICO that only want a free promotion land make only a bounty for there marketing .
Sold out is the most important with success ICO, without raised sold out on hard cap ICO can failed because they can't pay fee for listing on exchange market, other thing to success ICO is have good team and owner want to work hard for listing with big market, if success sold without listing with big market ICO will failed with lower price after listing, the last thing maybe have continue with the ICO coin how wver after listing team and to update and get new feature with their ICO coin.
We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.
Theres probably a lot of things successful ICOs have in common. However, it should only be one thing that should set them apart, and that is PURPOSE. Any new ICOs or projects should be solving a real problem in the real world.
Without such, the ICO is not heading towards success or anything at all.
I think your statement is true that we often find hundreds of projects that have real concepts or goals, but in reality they don't match the information on their road map. team and dev are important roles in a project, but now the opposite, many teams and dev cheat in managing their project is not right.
I don't know how many projects completed their roadmap but projects had these things in common.
1. Perfect Whitepaper
2. Solid Team
3. Roadmap
4. Working Product
5. Hype
In addition to what you have mentioned above, I think the project partners are also an extremely important factor. Investors also appreciate the good partners that the project has. In addition to the current IEO trend, the IEO on any exchange will determine the success of the project. 1. Perfect Whitepaper
2. Solid Team
3. Roadmap
4. Working Product
5. Hype
We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.
Everyday new projects is emerge by new idea. This all project has one traget, hardcap reached. Coinmarketcap listed in 200 but this project also did hype that this coin will listed in Binance exchange. Today I got a news from another coin, they are ready to launch website and then Binance exchange. 
In my opinion, the things that make ICO successful is not enough to use their hype or detailed presentation of the company's roadmap. But it must have something unique and different from ICO in general, so with the uniqueness will attract people's attention. if people are interested, they will definitely join the ICO project And no less important is the financial strategy, because good projects must be able to fund the project itself without being dependent on investors. And finally marketing strategy, the success of projects depends marketing team to introduce its products well. In order to be well received too. Another reason servants do not only until the sale of TOKEN but until the coins enter the exchanges.
We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.
That is true successful ICO have exhibited common factpr like roadamp and whitepaper presentation of the project but be careful even fake project are using that way to hype their project to scam the investor's.
For me succesful ICOs are those that come up with unique idea that has real world use cases and acceptance, secondly real team with relevant experience is a must, thirdly some big names as advisors to hype up the ico works wonders, fourth the size of the community at major social media channels and the activity of the team at these channels is very important, lastly proactiveness of the team and developers both in regard to product development and investor or customer relations is important where issues like listing on exchanges etc are done in a timely manner.
I also think having a rare idea is most necessary factor. Always the same products and promises shake the reliance as time goes by. Surely, only the rare product is not enough, a realistic roadmap and a experienced team that can implement it. IMO all of this could be enough for a successful project. But the big name advisors and the number of communities are unnecessary. Once the project is good, both the advisors and the community will increase by themselves. 
Having a professional and reliable team is the most important thing that every ICO / IEO project must have, because without a professional team, often the project Will fail and die. Furthermore, their mission and vision must be clear and logical without make doubt for us.
This is the hardest part.. Detecting the professional team itself, it's really hard since they can make fake linkedin and some of them talk like an experinced crypto person.
We need to approach them deeply to make sure they're know what they are doing
For me succesful ICOs are those that come up with unique idea that has real world use cases and acceptance, secondly real team with relevant experience is a must, thirdly some big names as advisors to hype up the ico works wonders, fourth the size of the community at major social media channels and the activity of the team at these channels is very important, lastly proactiveness of the team and developers both in regard to product development and investor or customer relations is important where issues like listing on exchanges etc are done in a timely manner.
The main thing for any ICOs project is financing. No funding - no implementation.
Therefore, first of all, you should pay attention to partners and also whether the project has external investors who will provide initial capital for the start of the project.
Also, no harm will be familiar with how the project is going to distribute the funds, sometimes immediately clear financial strategy and whether it will be successful.
How is it possible to know the information about external investors of the project? Have you ever tried to do such an analysis by yourself? I do not think this item can be checked. Therefore, first of all, you should pay attention to partners and also whether the project has external investors who will provide initial capital for the start of the project.
Also, no harm will be familiar with how the project is going to distribute the funds, sometimes immediately clear financial strategy and whether it will be successful.
We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.
You talked about 5 successful things that ICO have in common and yet you only listed 2 here, so you are leaving us with just two to talk on. Nevertheless, I think you are right about it, one thing they have in common that is destroying them is hype. I prefer a project to grow to the level where the hype will come by itself and not the one that people artificially create hype for it, which is why you see that they all fail along the line.Hype fails them a lot because people will only be invited to take a look at what benefit the coin can give financially and not the product itself, if the hype was on the product, then they would have gotten people using the coin product itself than just investing to expect some sort of cash to come out of it without them asking how the product is generating fund exactly.
The main thing for any ICOs project is financing. No funding - no implementation.
Therefore, first of all, you should pay attention to partners and also whether the project has external investors who will provide initial capital for the start of the project.
Also, no harm will be familiar with how the project is going to distribute the funds, sometimes immediately clear financial strategy and whether it will be successful.
Therefore, first of all, you should pay attention to partners and also whether the project has external investors who will provide initial capital for the start of the project.
Also, no harm will be familiar with how the project is going to distribute the funds, sometimes immediately clear financial strategy and whether it will be successful.
We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.
Hype only make ICO success in sale, not means it is success in market. But for success in market, i think a project need something real. I mean something that really useful and make people use it. People use it, means more demands. We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.
The product of the project, its relevance to reality and the strong team that can create it are important factors. Promising roadmap after they are applied, and at the end IEO in top exchange. I do not think ICOs have been effective lately. Projects should always pay attention to market demand for better sales, so IEOs are preferred. We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.
Theres probably a lot of things successful ICOs have in common. However, it should only be one thing that should set them apart, and that is PURPOSE. Any new ICOs or projects should be solving a real problem in the real world.
Without such, the ICO is not heading towards success or anything at all.
We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.
Your topic for this post is not on par with the post, i thought you have the list of 5 things successful icos have in common? anyways, use of hype is present for all good and bad projects so its wrong if you think HYPE has a big part to play, even the detailed presentation of project's roadmap too, scam projects have good roadmap too
Project with fantasy speech won't survive for along. What I believe investors are looking for those that really resolve some issues or keen to bring change in crypto-market. Investor should go for those projects that have good market trend and experienced group members.
One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.
Hype no longer works that much now, the community has already learned a lot from what happened during the ICO days where it's easy to build hype because of influencers and rating sites that you can pay to give you the hype needed. What those well-funded projects should do is to focus on marketing their product once it's ready and platform development. They are making system where people can develop for crypto and contribute anything that their skillsets have to help the coin's progress. It's also true that roadmap is important since that's where we can tell if a project has a realistic goal or not.
Regardless of what they have in common, people should be eager to research before investing in. Libra had all the hype in the world but was somehow blocked by governments and it doesn't taste well on investors' mouth.
We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.
I think it is necessary to impose sanctions on people who post only to promote their own project without sharing any information within the forum. This is the other form of creating SPAM! Such content is the easiest way to create SPAM. I can create about 200 posts like this in a day.
Jump to: