“We don’t see the Crypto Fund so much as being crypto,” says Lomazzo, speaking from Unicef’s Office of Innovation in New York City. “What we really see it as is being ready for a digital future. We’re going to need to be ready to deal with digital assets whether that be bitcoin or ether or some other government-backed digital currency. It could be any of those, but this is really helping us build up the muscles to understand how to live or how to on-board digital assets.”
I tried to format the article so that a person can sift through nearly all of the relevent information simply by reading the bolded segments. But its not perfect.
Suffice it to say, this is a HUGE move by the UN.
I really like how they viewed crypto as a digital future. Unicef accepting crypto as not a virtual currency but rather as a currency shows that much potential in the future of our world.
While Lomazzo and the rest of her team hope the Crypto Fund will help them tap into the $170 billion combined market capitalization represented by bitcoin and ethereum, there’s a second, potentially bigger reason for the nonprofit to accept and invest in crypto. At the time of launch only general donations can be accepted, but in the future, the Crypto Fund is especially well suited for directed donations, in which a donor can specify that his or her funds be used only, for example, to purchase pencils for schoolgirls in a particular region and would have 100% certainty that’s exactly what happened. Because ethereum and bitcoin transact on shared, public ledgers, the flow of funds can be easily tracked from donation to purchase. A 2018 report in the Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance showed that charities displaying a seal of transparency from the nonprofit GuideStar experienced a 53% increase in donations over the following year.
This is rather interesting. The transparency it gives out could potentially prove to be a plus on most of the beneficiaries' side. People could easily take notice of things that they find rather weird if ever and could easily report it to the higherups, showing a much more secure way of spending their money. If only governments would adopt such usage and let the people see how funds are spent every year, there would probably be no conflicts of the people against the government themselves and scams such as embezzlements could easily be taken note of.