Pages:
Author

Topic: 6 Bn ounces of gold and the value of bitcoin (Read 2346 times)

sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
August 26, 2013, 10:40:19 AM
#22
There is no hubbub. Money trades against everything on the market, that follows from the very definition of money, therefore money also trades against any other money type on the market.

You agree with the rest of my points?

Yes, except for the quantum computer hubbub  Smiley

That was goofy.  The point i wanted to make is this:  
It's unlikely that 5000 years ago anyone could have predicted today's tech -- the wheel epitomised the bleeding edge of technology ~3000 BC.  There's nothing to suggest Bitcoin, being closely linked to today's tech, will be remembered as a historical footnote in 5k years.  And i'm relying only on linear, not exponential growth Smiley

I agree, we can know nothing that far in the future. Currently, the brand of gold as it is engraved in the mythosphere is hard to compete with.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
There is no hubbub. Money trades against everything on the market, that follows from the very definition of money, therefore money also trades against any other money type on the market.

You agree with the rest of my points?

Yes, except for the quantum computer hubbub  Smiley

That was goofy.  The point i wanted to make is this: 
It's unlikely that 5000 years ago anyone could have predicted today's tech -- the wheel epitomised the bleeding edge of technology ~3000 BC.  There's nothing to suggest Bitcoin, being closely linked to today's tech, will be remembered as a historical footnote in 5k years.  And i'm relying only on linear, not exponential growth Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
There is no hubbub. Money trades against everything on the market, that follows from the very definition of money, therefore money also trades against any other money type on the market.

You agree with the rest of my points?

Yes, except for the quantum computer hubbub  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Obviously possible..

No need for hate fella's.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
There is no hubbub. Money trades against everything on the market, that follows from the very definition of money, therefore money also trades against any other money type on the market.

You agree with the rest of my points?
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
There is no hubbub. Money trades against everything on the market, that follows from the very definition of money, therefore money also trades against any other money type on the market.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
...
Historically, new and better money has always displaced older, less perferct money.

FTFY.  Newer, different, but not necessarily better.  Most goldbugs/fiat haters here will agree.

Quote
Thus, if bitcoin is better than gold, it could completely displace gold as money, leaving gold only with the intrinsic value.

Bitcoin may be better than gold, though it may or may not be better than fiat -- which is today's money.  Most Keynesians would vote nay.

Quote
Personally, I think gold has some properties that bitcoin does not have, including a 5000 year trust. Let's reconsider bitcoin versus gold in the year 7013, bitcoin may have the trust that gold enjoy now.

By that time technology will not mean just quantum computers, but quantum computers using quantum computers for quanta Cheesy  Bitcoin will be as useful as dinosaur repellent.

Quote
Fiat on the other hand ... it's going down.

Then why all the hubbub about exchanges & exchange rates?  Trade in bitcoins & return to Caesar what's Caesar's Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1045
rpietila already reached the conclusion that, should bitcoin take the place of gold, it would be worth 300 000 $/BTC. It looks like you did very similar napkin calculations.  Smiley

Historically, new and better money has always displaced older, less perferct money. Thus, if bitcoin is better than gold, it could completely displace gold as money, leaving gold only with the intrinsic value.

Personally, I think gold has some properties that bitcoin does not have, including a 5000 year trust. Let's reconsider bitcoin versus gold in the year 7013, bitcoin may have the trust that gold enjoy now.

Fiat on the other hand ... it's going down.

The first 5000 years were slow, we got the Internet these days.

True. However, I don't think you can make a Bitcoin wire like you can make a gold wire. Perhaps finally, finally, gold will some REAL use if it's price is down and no one bothers! It has some nice desirable physical properties
hero member
Activity: 811
Merit: 1000
Web Developer
rpietila already reached the conclusion that, should bitcoin take the place of gold, it would be worth 300 000 $/BTC. It looks like you did very similar napkin calculations.  Smiley

Historically, new and better money has always displaced older, less perferct money. Thus, if bitcoin is better than gold, it could completely displace gold as money, leaving gold only with the intrinsic value.

Personally, I think gold has some properties that bitcoin does not have, including a 5000 year trust. Let's reconsider bitcoin versus gold in the year 7013, bitcoin may have the trust that gold enjoy now.

Fiat on the other hand ... it's going down.

The first 5000 years were slow, we got the Internet these days.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
rpietila already reached the conclusion that, should bitcoin take the place of gold, it would be worth 300 000 $/BTC. It looks like you did very similar napkin calculations.  Smiley

Historically, new and better money has always displaced older, less perferct money. Thus, if bitcoin is better than gold, it could completely displace gold as money, leaving gold only with the intrinsic value.

Personally, I think gold has some properties that bitcoin does not have, including a 5000 year trust. Let's reconsider bitcoin versus gold in the year 7013, bitcoin may have the trust that gold enjoy now.

Fiat on the other hand ... it's going down.
hero member
Activity: 715
Merit: 500
Or if evert btc owner accepted btc in their workplace tomorrow.....
At a 20% discount .. wed all be rich by christmas

Yep, we can dream  Wink. But realistically, a similar scenario is very likely to happen in the coming decades with either bitcoin, another digital currency, or an amalgam of various digital currencies.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1001
Or if evert btc owner accepted btc in their workplace tomorrow.....
At a 20% discount .. wed all be rich by christmas
AU
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
not until we can cash out coins to personal debit cards... (without middle men)

then lets talk price rise
hero member
Activity: 811
Merit: 1000
Web Developer
When I start to see these kinds of posts it tells me that the rate is primed for a downturn.

But there's always posts like this.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
will never happen.
hero member
Activity: 496
Merit: 500
Spanish Bitcoin trader
rpietila already reached the conclusion that, should bitcoin take the place of gold, it would be worth 300 000 $/BTC. It looks like you did very similar napkin calculations.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
Want privacy? Use Monero!
I think 1 BTC = 1000 USD or even 10000 USD is fairly possible, if mass adoption occurs.
but >100000 is just too much Tongue
(unless Bernanke has a drunk night and doubles the monetary base over night)
hero member
Activity: 715
Merit: 500
According to Thomas Reuters GFMS, roughly 377 MM pounds of gold exist above ground which equates to about 6,000,000,000 ounces of gold. For simplicity, I'll use an undervaluation of gold at $1,000. This means the total value of gold above ground is roughly 6 trillion dollars.

If bitcoin is adopted on a global scale as a deflationary store of value that is coupled with other valuable functions, much in the same respect as gold, what does this mean for the potential price of one BTC? If BTC ever becomes as valuable as gold, we're looking at 6 trillion dollars divided by 21 MM instead of 6 Bn.

~ $285,000. Is that realistic? In my opinion, probably not. Is it a possiblity? Anything's possible, but this would make one satoshi worth $0.28, and I think that a satoshi would serve better payment functions at a smaller value.

No if 1 BTC is worth USD 285,000,  1 satoshi is worth USD 0.00285

Yep, nice correction.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
According to Thomas Reuters GFMS, roughly 377 MM pounds of gold exist above ground which equates to about 6,000,000,000 ounces of gold. For simplicity, I'll use an undervaluation of gold at $1,000. This means the total value of gold above ground is roughly 6 trillion dollars.

If bitcoin is adopted on a global scale as a deflationary store of value that is coupled with other valuable functions, much in the same respect as gold, what does this mean for the potential price of one BTC? If BTC ever becomes as valuable as gold, we're looking at 6 trillion dollars divided by 21 MM instead of 6 Bn.

~ $285,000. Is that realistic? In my opinion, probably not. Is it a possiblity? Anything's possible, but this would make one satoshi worth $0.28, and I think that a satoshi would serve better payment functions at a smaller value.

No if 1 BTC is worth USD 285,000,  1 satoshi is worth USD 0.00285
hero member
Activity: 715
Merit: 500
When I start to see these kinds of posts it tells me that the rate is primed for a downturn.

As stated, it is not my opinion bitcoin is ever going to be worth that much, and certainly not any time in the next decade, but is a 6 trillion dollar market capitalization ridiculous for a global currency? I don't think so.
Pages:
Jump to: