proof that if a miner tries blocks over 1mb, WITHOUT consensus... its rejected and trashed in 3 seconds
2017-01-29 06:59:12 Requesting block 000000000000000000cf208f521de0424677f7a87f2f278a1042f38d159565f5
2017-01-29 06:59:15 ERROR: AcceptBlock: bad-blk-length, size limits failed (code 16)
so that debunks everyones scripted FUD rhetoric of how dynamic miners have control..
3 seconds gone.
P.S dynamic implementations need NODE AND POOL CONSENSUS.
segwit are the ones that bypassed NODE consensus. and segwits Bip9 can drop its pool thrshold below 95%. oh and core can UASF ban hammer and change mining algo to get that threshold even lower..
its core with the deadlines and threats..
all while other open and diverse implementations have just run for the last 2 years with no deadlines no ACTUAL threats and just ltting the community have a free open choice.. take it or leave it
What can go wrong?
ADAM BACK CEO blockstream
Gmaxwell CTO blockstream
Gmaxwell moderator or technical discussion
Luke Jr moderator of other aspects.
core came into existance in 2014 and incorporated their lead company in 2014.. allowing 100 unpaid interns to kiss ass hoping for a scoop of the $70m and a glossy blockstream namebadge if they kiss ass
Blah blah blah. Same shit as always by this paid nerd. Get a life.
Facts remain:
1) BUcoin is shit software and no one supports it
2) 1)
Now go out for a walk, it's friday.