Topic: 9 MILLION WORTH OF BITCOIN TO GO UNDER THE HAMMER | DailySatoshi.com (Read 3188 times)
November 13, 2014, 12:03:15 PM
well this article gained the attention of the users
November 13, 2014, 02:36:37 AM
You think there's only 3 rich people/organisations in the world who could take a large chunk of coins privately ?
November 13, 2014, 02:33:07 AM
Seems like a big auction, get ready for a price shift, hopefully up!
Well if everyone remembers that the Federal Marshall's auction coins apparently sold at premium over spot, despite FUD, then it should move up.
although the dynamics of such an auction would indicate that they would sell at a discount due to the limited number of potential participants and requirement to buy a large amount
An exchange or a whale like Richard Branson etc could have taken the lot in one bite to make a profit later
The winklevoss brothers could have taken a loan from their dad to buy them
A hedge fund or venture capital firm could have swallowed the lot
Too many possibilities........
November 13, 2014, 01:05:40 AM
Seems like a big auction, get ready for a price shift, hopefully up!
Well if everyone remembers that the Federal Marshall's auction coins apparently sold at premium over spot, despite FUD, then it should move up.
although the dynamics of such an auction would indicate that they would sell at a discount due to the limited number of potential participants and requirement to buy a large amount
An exchange or a whale like Richard Branson etc could have taken the lot in one bite to make a profit later
The winklevoss brothers could have taken a loan from their dad to buy them
A hedge fund or venture capital firm could have swallowed the lot
Too many possibilities........
November 13, 2014, 12:58:28 AM
Seems like a big auction, get ready for a price shift, hopefully up!
Well if everyone remembers that the Federal Marshall's auction coins apparently sold at premium over spot, despite FUD, then it should move up.
although the dynamics of such an auction would indicate that they would sell at a discount due to the limited number of potential participants and requirement to buy a large amount
November 12, 2014, 07:32:04 PM
In case anyone is wondering WTF the article is referring to, it's this - a story which was reported two weeks ago.
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/australian-authorities-sitting-on-96-million-worth-of-bitcoins-confiscated-from-silk-road-drug-dealer-20141031-11ewk4.html
http://www.coindesk.com/australian-government-soon-hold-9-million-bitcoin-auction/
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/australian-authorities-sitting-on-96-million-worth-of-bitcoins-confiscated-from-silk-road-drug-dealer-20141031-11ewk4.html
http://www.coindesk.com/australian-government-soon-hold-9-million-bitcoin-auction/
November 12, 2014, 05:43:05 PM
Seems like a big auction, get ready for a price shift, hopefully up!
Well if everyone remembers that the Federal Marshall's auction coins apparently sold at premium over spot, despite FUD, then it should move up.
November 12, 2014, 05:06:33 PM
These are not "his" coins. This article is very poorly written.
This seems to be the trend among various "news" publications that write about bitcoin, although this article is exceptionally badly written. I think people are trying to make money from advertising so they will accept anyone to write for them so they can get a catchy headline, as many people will not go directly to a website for their bitcoin related news (as they would go to CNN or foxnews for "MSM" news) but would rather use services like zero block or google news to find news
Hey guys I've just returned from some time away and read this article. This isn't up to our standards (Sure some of our content isn't perfect but we at least fact check it) and I'm going to be removing it from our site. Thank you all for your feedback.
Also we are less about making ad money and more about bringing good content. Hence why I'm going to be reviewing the article with daily satoshis Cheif Editor to make sure nothing like this ever makes it onto our site again.
November 11, 2014, 07:49:25 PM
Is it just me or does the article give you brain damage?
Pretty badly written.
But those probably aren't "his" coins.
Pretty badly written.
But those probably aren't "his" coins.
Terrible syntax agreed but the main jist of it is understood.
Seems like a big auction, get ready for a price shift, hopefully up!
November 11, 2014, 04:06:30 PM
Is it just me or does the article give you brain damage?
Pretty badly written.
But those probably aren't "his" coins.
Pretty badly written.
But those probably aren't "his" coins.
Terrible syntax agreed but the main jist of it is understood.
Seems like a big auction, get ready for a price shift, hopefully up!
Hopeful it's not a bust. I could really do a price jump at the moment.
I am quite sure anyone holding bitcoin could really do with a price jump at the moment, including me! Let's all use the currency and force it up
November 11, 2014, 04:03:38 PM
Is it just me or does the article give you brain damage?
Pretty badly written.
But those probably aren't "his" coins.
Pretty badly written.
But those probably aren't "his" coins.
Terrible syntax agreed but the main jist of it is understood.
Seems like a big auction, get ready for a price shift, hopefully up!
Hopeful it's not a bust. I could really do a price jump at the moment.
November 11, 2014, 03:48:23 PM
Is it just me or does the article give you brain damage?
Pretty badly written.
But those probably aren't "his" coins.
Pretty badly written.
But those probably aren't "his" coins.
Terrible syntax agreed but the main jist of it is understood.
Seems like a big auction, get ready for a price shift, hopefully up!
November 11, 2014, 02:59:05 PM
Is it just me or does the article give you brain damage?
Pretty badly written.
But those probably aren't "his" coins.
Pretty badly written.
But those probably aren't "his" coins.
November 11, 2014, 01:06:21 PM
These are not "his" coins. This article is very poorly written.
This seems to be the trend among various "news" publications that write about bitcoin, although this article is exceptionally badly written. I think people are trying to make money from advertising so they will accept anyone to write for them so they can get a catchy headline, as many people will not go directly to a website for their bitcoin related news (as they would go to CNN or foxnews for "MSM" news) but would rather use services like zero block or google news to find news
November 11, 2014, 12:54:56 PM
I also have some of Satoshi's coins. 
November 11, 2014, 12:46:00 PM
Satochi's coins ? you mean Bitcoin in general ? 
I didn't get it . if you speak about his coins which he mined or about Bitcoin in general.
I didn't get it . if you speak about his coins which he mined or about Bitcoin in general. November 11, 2014, 12:41:54 PM
These are not "his" coins. This article is very poorly written.
A lot of garbage coin sites full of crap articles popping up lately.
I mean just look at their about use page: http://dailysatoshi.com/about-us/
Yea a Lot of SHIT news sites are coming out of nowhere...So annoying.
November 11, 2014, 11:31:33 AM
Dude, that's one shitty article tbh, and really badly written. You need to change things around.
November 11, 2014, 09:20:50 AM
If you want to keep people on your site, then please do something about the person that is writing the articles.
Let some one else proofread everything before publishing, that would also help.
Let some one else proofread everything before publishing, that would also help.
November 11, 2014, 08:44:04 AM
This is a 9 out of 10 in the douchey article stakes...sad write up
Jump to: