Pages:
Author

Topic: 9 Misstatements you'll hear about Bitcoin on the media - page 2. (Read 344 times)

legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
Then it would be cheaper for them to run an append only SQL table. It also runs faster.

yeah but the point is that the blockchain technology doesn't have to be used for decentralization.

But would your "centralized blockchain" be cheaper, faster and more efficient than a SQL database? If the answer is no, then why run a blockchain?

Plus will it have a token to act as an incentive? Then what is the use of having one if it's centralized?

Quote
even in creating a cryptocurrency you can create a centralized one such as many altcoins that have already done it or the government issued cryptocurrencies such as Petro (Venezuelan crypto). being good/bad, efficient, cheaper or not is another argument though.

I believe you need to undertand the way Bitcoin is more and why it works.

again this is not an argument about whether it is good to do it or not, it is about the fact that it is being done.
as for centralized altcoins I can say it is a total bullshit because we already have them and all of them are pure crap.
as for government centralized altcoins I can't say because we only have one that started very recently. it doesn't seem like a good idea but we have to see how it turns out to be when other countries also do it.
as for other fields such as the SQL thing you ask, I have no idea because I have never seen any in action, I have only read news about them wanting to use it. and it doesn't seem different to me when it comes to speed. SQL database and blockchain are both a form of database but that is just my opinion.

existence of these things have nothing to do with bitcoin though. bitcoin is unique and exists and works and is growing in popularity because it is decentralized and secure. it fulfills a different purpose: a censorship resistance currency.
but centralized altcoins do exist and are popular. for example XRP is also popular because it  fulfills a different purpose: a shitcoin to be pumped and dumped and people have made profit from it.

When you use the word "blockchain" how would you define it? It has lately become a buzzword that it might have lost its real meaning. Or does it have a real meaning?

I believe we should have a common ground in how to define what a blockchain is because if not, then there's nothing for us to talk about.

Does a centralized ledger like Ripple need XRP? Why?
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1137
But on the 7th facts, we can deny that's the truth.
Many people used bitcoin to hide their money from money laundry or money that they get from robbery.
I said this because this is from facts.
But bitcoin is not created for crime, just people misused it.

just saying something is from "facts" doesn't make it a fact nor true. from my perspective this statement here is just your pure guess.
of course there are always people who use bitcoin for illegal activities but  calling it "many people" is not correct unless you have real evidence to support it.
full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 100
This is the truth about Bitcoin that we should share with our friends, relatives, your workmates, everyone!

Some of you might be disappointed with some of the facts, but you should understand your "investment".




But on the 7th facts, we can deny that's the truth.
Many people used bitcoin to hide their money from money laundry or money that they get from robbery.
I said this because this is from facts.
But bitcoin is not created for crime, just people misused it.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1163
Where is my ring of blades...
Then it would be cheaper for them to run an append only SQL table. It also runs faster.

yeah but the point is that the blockchain technology doesn't have to be used for decentralization.

But would your "centralized blockchain" be cheaper, faster and more efficient than a SQL database? If the answer is no, then why run a blockchain?

Plus will it have a token to act as an incentive? Then what is the use of having one if it's centralized?

Quote
even in creating a cryptocurrency you can create a centralized one such as many altcoins that have already done it or the government issued cryptocurrencies such as Petro (Venezuelan crypto). being good/bad, efficient, cheaper or not is another argument though.

I believe you need to undertand the way Bitcoin is more and why it works.

again this is not an argument about whether it is good to do it or not, it is about the fact that it is being done.
as for centralized altcoins I can say it is a total bullshit because we already have them and all of them are pure crap.
as for government centralized altcoins I can't say because we only have one that started very recently. it doesn't seem like a good idea but we have to see how it turns out to be when other countries also do it.
as for other fields such as the SQL thing you ask, I have no idea because I have never seen any in action, I have only read news about them wanting to use it. and it doesn't seem different to me when it comes to speed. SQL database and blockchain are both a form of database but that is just my opinion.

existence of these things have nothing to do with bitcoin though. bitcoin is unique and exists and works and is growing in popularity because it is decentralized and secure. it fulfills a different purpose: a censorship resistance currency.
but centralized altcoins do exist and are popular. for example XRP is also popular because it  fulfills a different purpose: a shitcoin to be pumped and dumped and people have made profit from it.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
Then it would be cheaper for them to run an append only SQL table. It also runs faster.

yeah but the point is that the blockchain technology doesn't have to be used for decentralization.

But would your "centralized blockchain" be cheaper, faster and more efficient than a SQL database? If the answer is no, then why run a blockchain?

Plus will it have a token to act as an incentive? Then what is the use of having one if it's centralized?

Quote
even in creating a cryptocurrency you can create a centralized one such as many altcoins that have already done it or the government issued cryptocurrencies such as Petro (Venezuelan crypto). being good/bad, efficient, cheaper or not is another argument though.

I believe you need to undertand the way Bitcoin is more and why it works.
member
Activity: 358
Merit: 11
The media need education about blockchain and cryptocurrency in general before commenting on issues related to it. Not only the media but even traders too are the cause of these misconception of bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1163
Where is my ring of blades...
Then it would be cheaper for them to run an append only SQL table. It also runs faster.

yeah but the point is that the blockchain technology doesn't have to be used for decentralization. even in creating a cryptocurrency you can create a centralized one such as many altcoins that have already done it or the government issued cryptocurrencies such as Petro (Venezuelan crypto). being good/bad, efficient, cheaper or not is another argument though.
newbie
Activity: 98
Merit: 0
Thank you for sharing. I find this really a bitcoin mistake. Hopefully after reading this article many people will understand better.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
#1 why does it say SHA2 instead of SHA256?

SHA2 is a set of cryptographic functions. SHA256 falls under it.

Quote
#2 nobody says that Tongue they say "miners" validate transactions which is somewhat true since they either run a node themselves for their farm or connect to a pool that runs a Fully Verification Node that does it for them.

Yet the media says mining = validation, which is not.

Quote
#6 is misleading. blockchain is the technology and it doesn't have to be used in a decentralized manner. it can be used by many sectors also. for example there are hospitals using blockchain technology to store and share their patient's documents and it is centralized and has nothing to do with a currency or asset (calling bitcoin an asset here is another mistake)

Then it would be cheaper for them to run an append only SQL table. It also runs faster.

Quote
although this explanation has nothing to do with "bitcoin can be surpassed" though! that statement is similar to #9 and is created to advertise altcoins and pump them nothing more.

But innovation should always be encouraged.
member
Activity: 458
Merit: 10
It's true that some of us are disappointed, but it does not matter to me because I know that it's part of the risk, and that's what has to be dealt with.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1163
Where is my ring of blades...
#1 why does it say SHA2 instead of SHA256?

#2 nobody says that Tongue they say "miners" validate transactions which is somewhat true since they either run a node themselves for their farm or connect to a pool that runs a Fully Verification Node that does it for them.

#6 is misleading. blockchain is the technology and it doesn't have to be used in a decentralized manner. it can be used by many sectors also. for example there are hospitals using blockchain technology to store and share their patient's documents and it is centralized and has nothing to do with a currency or asset (calling bitcoin an asset here is another mistake)
although this explanation has nothing to do with "bitcoin can be surpassed" though! that statement is similar to #9 and is created to advertise altcoins and pump them nothing more.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
This is the truth about Bitcoin that we should share with our friends, relatives, your workmates, everyone!

Some of you might be disappointed with some of the facts, but you should understand your "investment".


Pages:
Jump to: