Topic: 90% of bounty hunter never care about the quality of post - page 2. (Read 304 times)
Ice cream quality articles are mostly hunter articles for the campaign, and almost all hunters are novices so spamming is inevitable. Cases of non-compliance will be disqualified, and if the BMs cannot do that, they should not be considered.
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
This is reality but there's nothing we can do if you really mind on getting rid of those shit post and non relevant post because they would really be existing no matter what.
if you're stressed on seeing those shit post then you can always have the option to ignore or report such post if you do find it to be shit or non relevant.
Forum features are there which you can really make use of or you could also report the user who had been shitposting and make some spam post.This might not be a total solution of getting rid of spams or getting rid of low quality but at least you have done your part.
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts.
I think Bounty Hunters are bad posters so they only participate in Bounty. If they were quality posters, then of course they would take part in various discussions in the forum. And if everyone were quality posters, Bounty Hunters would not be found. Good and bad everyone is the part of our forum. I don't think it's right to ignore Bounty Hunters. Because the forum has created a bounty opportunity.They come to this forum not to discuss, but only to be filled with many bounty reports every week. That is why now there is a lot of spam happening there because even menager can't do anything because their job is to manage with many who promote.
The point is, if the goal is only for money then in the future they will not think independently how to get insights from this forum with lots of discussion.
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
When it comes to the quality of posts in the bounty campaign, it is obvious that it is lower than in the signature campaign. The main point is that signature campaigns are paid in BTC or other quickly convertible crypto, and bounty campaigns are paid in tokens that do not know what (or at all) will have value after the campaign ends.
When it comes to bounty managers, I'm sure they pay attention to the participants' posts. If they don't, it means that it is a very bad bounty manager.
I don't think thats true!
If you saying 90% don't care thats saying 90% of these campaigns are made up by spammers which is something the forum is against or at least discourages!
If this is true, you could always hit the report button whenever you see such posts and probably report this to the campaign manager who will most likely sort this out and save the campaign from further spam.
If you saying 90% don't care thats saying 90% of these campaigns are made up by spammers which is something the forum is against or at least discourages!
If this is true, you could always hit the report button whenever you see such posts and probably report this to the campaign manager who will most likely sort this out and save the campaign from further spam.
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts.
I think Bounty Hunters are bad posters so they only participate in Bounty. If they were quality posters, then of course they would take part in various discussions in the forum. And if everyone were quality posters, Bounty Hunters would not be found. Good and bad everyone is the part of our forum. I don't think it's right to ignore Bounty Hunters. Because the forum has created a bounty opportunity. 
I apologize for not being able to respond to you one by one. But I thank everyone who answered.
Some options that might be good when we find users posting junk or useless posts is to report to the moderator and also send PMs to the campaign manager. It's actually an easy task, but if everyone is doing the same then I don't think the moderators have enough time for that. Let's take a look at this moderation policy.
In essence, I don't want to make you think that what I'm saying is to solve problems, but you should use your common sense to judge positives and make people aware of the quality of writing with a background in knowledge and experience. Look at them, so afraid to post on a thread that has a lot of competent users. My heart says it's time for a _BlackStar to shine. Thank you.
There are very few rules you have to obey if you want to be a quality poster and you probably won't be dimmed by it.
Some options that might be good when we find users posting junk or useless posts is to report to the moderator and also send PMs to the campaign manager. It's actually an easy task, but if everyone is doing the same then I don't think the moderators have enough time for that. Let's take a look at this moderation policy.
The policy to not remove anything worked when the forum was small. Now that we have thousands of posts a day, we can't afford 50% of them being junk. The moderators are now instructed to be less tolerant of low-value posts.
Some guidelines:
1. Free speech - you can say anything as long as it is relevant and presented in a calm and polite manner. Swearing, SHOUTING etc. make your post more likely to be removed.
2. No zero value posts or threads, like "SELL SELL SELL"
3. No pointless or uninteresting threads.
4. No referral code spam
5. No NSFW content
Some guidelines:
1. Free speech - you can say anything as long as it is relevant and presented in a calm and polite manner. Swearing, SHOUTING etc. make your post more likely to be removed.
2. No zero value posts or threads, like "SELL SELL SELL"
3. No pointless or uninteresting threads.
4. No referral code spam
5. No NSFW content
In essence, I don't want to make you think that what I'm saying is to solve problems, but you should use your common sense to judge positives and make people aware of the quality of writing with a background in knowledge and experience. Look at them, so afraid to post on a thread that has a lot of competent users. My heart says it's time for a _BlackStar to shine. Thank you.
There are very few rules you have to obey if you want to be a quality poster and you probably won't be dimmed by it.
If you think those bounty hunters are spamming, you can always report all of their posts to moderator or even contact the bounty manager where they joined. No need to disscuss like this since creating such topic like this won't solve the problem of spam post.
Cannot be denied that this is happening, then you can play a role by reporting any posts that indicate spam or out off topics.
Perhaps why are many bounty hunters whose posts are included in low quality posts but are still accepted by BM because of the large number of participants so that BM has difficulty checking one by one the posts of the participants applying for their bounties, and many BM who hold more than one bounty campaign, thereby reducing the ability to maintain the quality of their participants this reason cannot be accepted but exist.
Perhaps why are many bounty hunters whose posts are included in low quality posts but are still accepted by BM because of the large number of participants so that BM has difficulty checking one by one the posts of the participants applying for their bounties, and many BM who hold more than one bounty campaign, thereby reducing the ability to maintain the quality of their participants this reason cannot be accepted but exist.
What you are complaining about right now is something that has been happening for years and will probably never stop. If you care about forum rule and cleanliness, use common sense to report any post that you find low quality, spam, or useless. This is an easy task until you feel that the button will be of use to anyone.
I also don't deny that there are some bounty manager who don't seem to really care about the quality of participants' post, they just want to recruit participant to spread awareness of the ongoing project. As long as participant can meet the requirement required by the bounty, participant will get paid even though they do not meet the expected quality. But I also believe that there are manager who have strict rule about the participant they want to work with, they are selective enough that someone could still potentially be disqualified if caught as a spam and low-quality poster.
I also don't deny that there are some bounty manager who don't seem to really care about the quality of participants' post, they just want to recruit participant to spread awareness of the ongoing project. As long as participant can meet the requirement required by the bounty, participant will get paid even though they do not meet the expected quality. But I also believe that there are manager who have strict rule about the participant they want to work with, they are selective enough that someone could still potentially be disqualified if caught as a spam and low-quality poster.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1083
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Well, what can I say, you might be right @poster, but I will say that I think it has to do with mentality, some people under some circumstances are always in a hurry to complete their work or meet up with their target number of post that they end up not caring whether what they post make sense or not.
Other have to do with the topic in question, not all but some will agree with me that most of the topics we see on different sections of this platform are nothing but shit post, when a topic does not make sense, it is highly possible that the replies that topic will get will not make any sense too, and another thing is that some people are just naturally bad posters, nothing can be done about this set of people except to keep teaching them until they learn.
Other have to do with the topic in question, not all but some will agree with me that most of the topics we see on different sections of this platform are nothing but shit post, when a topic does not make sense, it is highly possible that the replies that topic will get will not make any sense too, and another thing is that some people are just naturally bad posters, nothing can be done about this set of people except to keep teaching them until they learn.
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
You got it the other way around. It's the bounty managers that don't care about quality of posts.
If BM's would penalize shitposting, then there would be less of it. But many don't. They just check post count and say "he did his 30 posts for the week"
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
You should accept this trash on the forums, it is inevitable to launch a bounty campaign. The BMs will have their own way, and sometimes it may be imperfect, but we don't have to be so absolute in everything. If you find that the BM does not follow the procedure, you can contact directly or in a worse case, underestimate them on the forum. Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
The bounty campaign itself a junk that is why people who post something make sense avoiding them for very long time so the bounty teams are exposing the projects with the participants they get. And there is no loss for the bounty team due to the spammers and not much reputed campaign managers also promoting bounties these days. So now hunters needs to stop because team itself managing their bounties most of the time. Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
Today some managers have their own blacklists. If the manager sees bad or empty posts, he can easily remove such a member and add him to the blacklist. You also have the option to report to moderators if you see low-quality posts.
But something else is important and interesting. Bad posters need to understand that with their level of publication, it will be difficult for them to get into a company that can pay well. And here you need a choice, or try and write competent posts, thereby being able to earn a little, or just spend time on companies that may not pay at all.
But something else is important and interesting. Bad posters need to understand that with their level of publication, it will be difficult for them to get into a company that can pay well. And here you need a choice, or try and write competent posts, thereby being able to earn a little, or just spend time on companies that may not pay at all.
i feel you OP, we already know that the 10% that are like me are the only ones who care.
the bounty manager could really impose strict rules when it comes to accepting participants so he can make sure that the only ones who join are the ones that can participate in a good discussion. this will however make the campaign slightly unsuccessful since the goal of promoting a new project is to make their project visible to the community. if only a few people can participate, the project might not get attention.
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
The only problem is the massive number of the bounty project which is of course need a huge number of bounty participants as well and the end result is, those who care about their posts often recruited to the legit signature campaigns because of their posts qualities. Those who are not capable of doing such things are listed to the token signature campaign and I'm not saying all of them are trash posters some of them are also fine and doing their job well. But the main cause of this problem is the number of signature campaigns in the bounty section which required lots of users to join.
If the accounts that are joining mainly are newbies, you could expect that kind of quality from them. Not all, but there is a lot for sure. I think their bounty's main reason is to get noticed and be advertised whether or not it's quality. That's up to the bounty manager to decide.
I think it's still best to go to do bounty if they are being managed by a great campaign manager, great meaning trustworthy, and abides by the rules.
But in every Bounty page for the project, the rules are always there about what the bounty managers want with regards to the quality of posts that is expected from a bounty Hunter but the thing is, hunters will always want to complete their number of post required but whether it is considered quality enough or not but it is the responsibility of who ever is in charge to check those posts and I believe the bounty managers do because I have seen on many bounty spreadsheets where bounty managers have not awarded points, reasons are “Need quality post”I think it's still best to go to do bounty if they are being managed by a great campaign manager, great meaning trustworthy, and abides by the rules.
So you might not see it here on the thread but it is noted on their bounty sheet where the points are been awarded.
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
I don't think other bounty managers check them manually because they even accept and pay cheaters I wonder why they can't spot and disqualify them all. But shitposting is not a problem anymore since moderators are checking them regularly and delete all of those kind of posts. Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
I don't want to fool myself into not saying that 90% of forum users who join the bounty are bad posters who never care about the quality of their posts. For obvious reasons, why do these people continue to be given opportunities and get paid just for sending spam or junk?
This has been the problem since 2017 bull run, a lot of newbies joined this community just to do bounty hunting. And it's the most frown activity here, but what can we do? they bring traffic to this community that Theymos are not going to totally ban bounties here.
Not sure many bounty manager really care about the quality of the posts from the participant. This doesn't make any sense, but hasn't really been fixed for a long time. Based on my research, some of these bounty manager still accept participant who have been tagged as seemingly violating the rules legally.
Don't generalised things, there could be bounty managers who are very strict as far as post quality is concern before accepting participants.
Jump to: