Topic: A Bitcoin Credit Union? (Read 6103 times)

I don't see anything wrong in principle with bitcoin banks and credit unions, in the sense of businesses that, through some kind of mechanism, pay you interest on your BTC while finding people they can loan to at (higher) interest.

But it's still getting way ahead of ourselves.  Before this kind of Bitcoin bank can exist, the Bitcoin economy must be a lot more mature, to the point that both lenders and borrowers can gauge what their payments/income would be in real terms.  That requires higher liquidity and lower volatility than currently exists -- and, of course, wider acceptance.

At this point, the only function of a bank that you need is to keep your money safe so that e.g. when your government inflates your currency, you can convert back out to the inflated units.  But you can already "be your own bank" in that sense, without any financial intermediary, simply by following regular protocols for backing up your wallet, running a client, etc.

Certainly true.  I don't think bitcoin is a financial panacea.  It might one day stop governments from doing (some) stupid things with our money; but it won't stop us ourselves doing stupid things with our money.


It might mitigate the problem slightly as (at present) those things that you've named are more stable than bitcoin; but none of them has retained value exactly.  Gold has rocketed up over the last few years; if you'd borrowed gold in 2007, you'd be feeling queasy now (assuming you spent it).  If you borrowed fiat on the other hand, you'd be pretty happy.  Your bank... not so much.

If there is one good thing about all this fiat inflation it is that my bank foolishly denominated by mortgage in fiat.  HA!  Win for me.  Not so good for the savers.

"credit requires something bitcoin cannot supply at present: stability"

Thank goodness for that, debt as we're seeing is a pain in the butt. I think there can come a point where centralised banking and money printing is fixed by bitcoin but all the problems we had before (now) come back just the same.

Still, if you wanted to do this you could store reserves in gold and just do the transactions in Bitcoin, or perhaps prepaid debit cards denominated in fiat.

How about a BTC pawn shop. You could establish one with partners all over the world . Partners could get a nice piece of the commission to verify and store the property and the central pawner would supply the BTC. You would only need to trust/verify the partners and not every customer.

Credit unions are a nice idea, but credit requires something bitcoin cannot supply at present: stability.

Is anyone going to be willing to bet that bitcoins won't change by an enormous amount over 6 months?

If they go up, the borrower is screwed as the btc/hour of their work falls, but the debt doesn't.

If bitcoins go down, the lender is screwed as the borrower just spends a few dollars to payback what was originally (say) a car loan.

Credit denominated in bitcoins is years away.

I have no job, no income, and I'm broke.  My credit is therefore way down.  When I HAD employment I tried to keep up with all of my bills, and maintained a pretty good credit rating.  Having a bad credit rating, these days, actually makes it harder to get a job, harder to get a place to live, etc.  How could I possibly build up BT credit?  Or reputation, if you are talking about a trust system, like Web of Trust.  I was given 0.5 BTC way back when I first started on my own BTC journey.  Since then I've received and spent a total of 8 BTC, or something, even though at any given point I rarely had more than 1 BTC in my wallet.  Does that mean I've built up some trust?  I dunno.  Could I borrow and pay back a bitcoin?  Then borrow and payback two?  Then three, etc.?  Incrementally working my way up?

If someone gave me enough BTC to purchase and run my own mining rig, I'd be able to Earn BTC and pay a monthly amount till I finally pay off the loan.  And I'd do that, and not skip off with the BTC, because the incentive of being Trusted for higher and higher loan amounts is far better than the horrible feeling I'd have from stealing all those bitcoins and losing all the trust I'd built up over time.

I just posted some observations on this idea over at the Credit Union History blog: http://cuhistory.blogspot.com/2011/04/bitcoin-natural-experiment-for-credit.html

Shhhh...... Don't give away the bank here.

Shorting is where the money is, especially when you can cause the rate to go down.

Fixed time period deposits, such as CDs, are perfectly compatible with 100% reserve banking.

If people actually wanted loans of bitcoins, you deposit money in the bank.  You cannot withdraw it for 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, whatever.  I loan the money to a group of other people over a similar time period.  When your time is up, you can renew the CD or you can cash out and get your interest.

No problems there.

I could see borrowing bitcoins for trading purposes as well.  If you want to "short" a bitcoin, you borrow one, you then sell it to someone else, then buy back when the time is up at the end.

A key element might involve the creation of many credit unions, as one of the original bases of the movement was that the members of the organization shared a "common bond," which ensured that members would be generally aware of each others' financial situations, and that there would be social consequences for people who default.  As such, perhaps you would have many small "credit unions," and if any one has a surplus of deposits or credit demand, they could make inter-institutional loans through a meta-credit union that would be owned co-operatively by the credit unions.

As a historian of the credit union movement, I think this idea is the bee's knees. I'll be curious to watch for new developments...

The beauty here is that there does not have to be majority rule. If you have a solid idea... go for it... even if it's not anonymous. Let those that don't wish to participate choose not to, or come up with a better idea. I think many will participate as is.

You don't understand what fractional banking is... Nor do you understand why it's a problem.

It's common sense to take a collateral for a loan. This may require the transaction to be done in the open. From my stand point, a Bitcoin CU would operate the exact same as a regular CU, only that it lends Bitcoin. Certain financial practices require for the parties involved to be known. The anonymous aspect of Bitcoin is a plus, but not a necessity in itself. And frankly, the anonymous part is really icing on the cake. As long as your funds can't be ceased or frozen, you're exposing yourself to much less risks by dealing in the open.

Fractional reserve banking is not necessary.

Investors (credit union members) make an initial deposit into the credit union. The stipulations for investing is that you can not withdrawal your money for a certain period of time. The reason for wanting to invest is profit from interest. So, the bank is funded. It can then loan out money. When the money is paid back, interest is added. The interest is returned to the investors as profit. Since the members own the credit union, all of the profit goes to them. Of course if there are extra expenses, they will be taken from the profit.

As you can see, this is far different from depositing money into a bank that does with it whatever it pleases. Investments and loans are an important part of an economy, neither of which requires anything close to fractional reserve banking.

I think it's a fantastic idea with many hurdles to overcome to function properly.

Fiat, government-inflicted world.

Bitcoin is real, unless you mean the Fiat world?!

People folding on loans won't ruin Bitcoin. Unlike in the real world, the banks will fail and the government won't be there to pick them up. Loss will be mostly isolated.

Credit Unions ... Nice .. FRACTIONAL BANKING ALL OVER AGAIN .. the bubble begins, slavery and death to all


Stupid idea .. that's why we use BTC, Gold, Silver ... if you don't like it ... go back to Fiat.

That's the main problem ALL lenders face.

I have been on both sides of that equation, in various capacities. In reality, I think everyone has their thresholds. Most people, most of the time, have every intention of paying, and even doing so on time. However, everyone has a threshold at which point they need to make a decision, pay the loan, or pay for something else. There is also a ceiling where its not a decision, and they just can't pay (at least, on time). Sometimes the threshold is above the ceiling.

Some people, have very low thresholds, others, have just have very low ceilings. As a lender, these people are pretty similar in their effects. Certainly, its much easier to feel sorry for people who get laid off, have deaths in the family, or other events that leave them unable to pay than say, someone who blows it partying and doesn't put the time and effort in to even find a job. However, the end result is the same whether they have a good song and dance or not.

Anyway here is my thought. A credit union is usually also a bank. So, registering an account, and keeping that account open, moving balances in and out, all that, adds up to a certain credibility in and of itself. What if, instead of just being a normal bank that's borrowing from peter to lend to Paul, what if you allowed depositors to be investors in the loans to spread the risk and profit.... and only lend to other customers who have been doing business there for at least say... 6 months to a year.

It only helps so much.... when a business dies, it dies, when income goes away, it goes away, and sometimes these are unpredictable to the person it happens to, never mind to his creditors. However, it does at least establish some history and credibility to weed out some scammers and some of those who are just too desperate to be making promises at repayment.

There is also some relevant technical discussion in this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/new-wiki-page-on-bitcoin-credit-5027