Biden is a dumbass just like ChatGPT. I have a better idea. Why don't we have debtor's prisons for people who don't pay back their student loans? Oh. And these debtor's also need to pay for the cost of their own imprisonment.
i bet they would start paying back their loans ASAP then! that's a wonderful idea Dr. Joseph. I have never heard it before. But I like it!
Topic: A college degree is no longer a signal of intelligence. - page 2. (Read 684 times)
People with student loan debt seriously need to be locked up in debtor's prisons.
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
I don't know about all of them, maybe just the ones who dont pay their loans back and thanks to biden never have to. What do you think Dr. Joseph? Do you think it's fair that the american taxpayer has to pay all these peoples' college loans? But then people who paid off their loans they don't get anything back and people who never went to college, F*** them they still have to pay higher taxes to bail these people out thanks to biden.
most employers that just require people to have a "degree" even if its not in the skillbase required for the role, are employers just looking for people that:
commit to a placement for years
conform to schedules
conform to following mentors/supervisors/managers(lecturers) tasks
submit results in timescales
have experience of work/performance being scrutinised without resulting in emotional outbursts
Those are idiots who you really do not want to work for. They will ruin you. Colleges are extremely unprofessional. They need to f@#$ing apologize for f@#$ing promoting violence.commit to a placement for years
conform to schedules
conform to following mentors/supervisors/managers(lecturers) tasks
submit results in timescales
have experience of work/performance being scrutinised without resulting in emotional outbursts
Adding Ph.D to your signature is no longer a sign of intelligence. 
I can back up any claim of intelligence with actual intelligence. The real question is now whether you have enough intelligence to recognize intelligence.Adding Ph.D to your signature is no longer a sign of intelligence.
a phD is smarter than a person with just a masters though. people get masters degrees like they get big macs at macdonalds...
Adding Ph.D to your signature is no longer a sign of intelligence.
a phD is smarter than a person with just a masters though. people get masters degrees like they get big macs at macdonalds...
People "get" Doctorates just by typing the letters. (See OP) Doesn't mean they are smarter.
Adding Ph.D to your signature is no longer a sign of intelligence.
a phD is smarter than a person with just a masters though. people get masters degrees like they get big macs at macdonalds...
People "get" Doctorates just by typing the letters. (See OP) Doesn't mean they are smarter.
dr. joseph is a pretty brilliant mathematician. at least he got his phD in something that required some hard work. and dedication. not only that but i think he is a lifelong learner. that's what a phD is really all about anyhow.
Regards,
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
Adding Ph.D to your signature is no longer a sign of intelligence.
a phD is smarter than a person with just a masters though. people get masters degrees like they get big macs at macdonalds...
People "get" Doctorates just by typing the letters. (See OP) Doesn't mean they are smarter.
dr. joseph is a pretty brilliant mathematician. at least he got his phD in something that required some hard work. and dedication. not only that but i think he is a lifelong learner. that's what a phD is really all about anyhow.
Adding Ph.D to your signature is no longer a sign of intelligence.
a phD is smarter than a person with just a masters though. people get masters degrees like they get big macs at macdonalds...
People "get" Doctorates just by typing the letters. (See OP) Doesn't mean they are smarter.
Adding Ph.D to your signature is no longer a sign of intelligence.
a phD is smarter than a person with just a masters though. people get masters degrees like they get big macs at macdonalds...
Adding Ph.D to your signature is no longer a sign of intelligence.
most employers that just require people to have a "degree" even if its not in the skillbase required for the role, are employers just looking for people that:
commit to a placement for years
conform to schedules
conform to following mentors/supervisors/managers(lecturers) tasks
submit results in timescales
have experience of work/performance being scrutinised without resulting in emotional outbursts
commit to a placement for years
conform to schedules
conform to following mentors/supervisors/managers(lecturers) tasks
submit results in timescales
have experience of work/performance being scrutinised without resulting in emotional outbursts
People with student loan debt seriously need to be locked up in debtor's prisons.
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
I don't know about all of them, maybe just the ones who dont pay their loans back and thanks to biden never have to. What do you think Dr. Joseph? Do you think it's fair that the american taxpayer has to pay all these peoples' college loans? But then people who paid off their loans they don't get anything back and people who never went to college, F*** them they still have to pay higher taxes to bail these people out thanks to biden.
A college degree is less important now due to technology & alternative learning options. Intelligence is not solely measured by a degree as it encompasses various skills. Critical thinking, problem solving, creativity & adaptability are examples of intelligence that can be demonstrated through different means.
Yes, I agree with you, gone are those days when education was all a man needs for survival, here in Africa we were meant to understand that going to school and getting the degrees and certificates was for our future, as we can use it to get well paid jobs (Government or private) in other to earn a living, but as we grew up and faced life proper we were meant to understand that survival was about 30% of your degree and 70% of what you can do with your hands, like a skill, Most persons studied hard to know, while some studied to pass exams, the ones that studied to know actually knew and those that studied to pass exams, they actually passed the exams but forgot what they read after the exams, most first class students can't use their intelligence to real life issues, they are only good at reading for exams and getting good grades.
Your opinion is the same as the statement from the Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture, which states "Higher education is only a tertiary education requirement or is not mandatory". On the other hand, the government requires that to become an ASN in the government or BUMN, college graduates are required. And in the 1945 Constitution, Article 31 states that every citizen has the right to education. This confirms that it is the state's right and obligation to ensure access to adequate education for all citizens. So in my opinion, higher education for citizens is very necessary to create a developed country.
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
A college degree is less important now due to technology & alternative learning options. Intelligence is not solely measured by a degree as it encompasses various skills. Critical thinking, problem solving, creativity & adaptability are examples of intelligence that can be demonstrated through different means.
Yes, I agree with you, gone are those days when education was all a man needs for survival, here in Africa we were meant to understand that going to school and getting the degrees and certificates was for our future, as we can use it to get well paid jobs (Government or private) in other to earn a living, but as we grew up and faced life proper we were meant to understand that survival was about 30% of your degree and 70% of what you can do with your hands, like a skill, Most persons studied hard to know, while some studied to pass exams, the ones that studied to know actually knew and those that studied to pass exams, they actually passed the exams but forgot what they read after the exams, most first class students can't use their intelligence to real life issues, they are only good at reading for exams and getting good grades.
Your opinion is the same as the statement from the Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture, which states "Higher education is only a tertiary education requirement or is not mandatory". On the other hand, the government requires that to become an ASN in the government or BUMN, college graduates are required. And in the 1945 Constitution, Article 31 states that every citizen has the right to education. This confirms that it is the state's right and obligation to ensure access to adequate education for all citizens. So in my opinion, higher education for citizens is very necessary to create a developed country.
A college degree is less important now due to technology & alternative learning options. Intelligence is not solely measured by a degree as it encompasses various skills. Critical thinking, problem solving, creativity & adaptability are examples of intelligence that can be demonstrated through different means.
Yes, I agree with you, gone are those days when education was all a man needs for survival, here in Africa we were meant to understand that going to school and getting the degrees and certificates was for our future, as we can use it to get well paid jobs (Government or private) in other to earn a living, but as we grew up and faced life proper we were meant to understand that survival was about 30% of your degree and 70% of what you can do with your hands, like a skill, Most persons studied hard to know, while some studied to pass exams, the ones that studied to know actually knew and those that studied to pass exams, they actually passed the exams but forgot what they read after the exams, most first class students can't use their intelligence to real life issues, they are only good at reading for exams and getting good grades.
Quote
Frankly, your manner of calling people to your cause leaves much to be desired. I can't believe it is effective for you. I don't know of anyone who would be attracted to support you by receiving a giant image of Hitler in their inbox. Most people would immediately block someone who sent a giant image of Hitler to them, and indeed, the only reason I didn't do so is because I have known you a while and we've had some interesting mathematical interactions, and so I think you deserve some leeway. But I don't care ever to receive such a message again. I support your right to cancel class if you are threatened, and I have told you as much in the past. But as far as I am concerned, your current behavior on the matter puts me completely off.
Kind regards,
Joel
I showed this professor a picture of Hitler because he was a professor at a Nazi institution. The correct response to this would be to denounce the violence and threats of violence against me. This professor refused to denounce the threats of violence because this professor promotes violence. But I am glad that this professor responded so that I can post this message all across the internet so that we can all mock universities for the s@#$holes that they really are. This professor cannot even do any research that has any practical value whatsoever. Or maybe it will in the deep future, but ain't nobody got time for that. I sincerely apologize for using a double negative.Kind regards,
Joel
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
A college degree is less important now due to technology & alternative learning options. Intelligence is not solely measured by a degree as it encompasses various skills. Critical thinking, problem solving, creativity & adaptability are examples of intelligence that can be demonstrated through different means.
Yes, I agree with you, gone are those days when education was all a man needs for survival, here in Africa we were meant to understand that going to school and getting the degrees and certificates was for our future, as we can use it to get well paid jobs (Government or private) in other to earn a living, but as we grew up and faced life proper we were meant to understand that survival was about 30% of your degree and 70% of what you can do with your hands, like a skill, Most persons studied hard to know, while some studied to pass exams, the ones that studied to know actually knew and those that studied to pass exams, they actually passed the exams but forgot what they read after the exams, most first class students can't use their intelligence to real life issues, they are only good at reading for exams and getting good grades.
Again, congratulations on completing your Ph.D. program! It's understandable that you appreciate genuine discussions rather than flattery. Regarding Bitcoin's mining algorithm, it's important to remember that its primary purpose was to secure transactions and provide a decentralized monetary system. However, I believe intelligence encompasses different fields of knowledge, and although not everyone may fully grasp the intricacies of Bitcoin's algorithm, it doesn't necessarily imply a lack of intelligence within the community. Open dialogue and sharing insights can help bridge gaps in understanding. What are your thoughts on potential intersections between Bitcoin and scientific advancements?
It is easy to use computation for a scientific purpose. It is also easy to create a cryptocurrency mining algorithm that secures the cryptocurrency, and this task is so easy that it is kind of boring and routine; I am not interested in this at all. It is more difficult to create a cryptocurrency mining algorithm that secures the cryptocurrency and also uses that computation to solve some other important problem. Since this task is more difficult, this is where all the innovation lies (and it is even more difficult to measure the cryptographic security of the new mining algorithm; one needs mathematicians and/or cryptographers to measure the security of mining algorithms and select a secure mining algorithm). But since the Bitcoin community has such a low level of intelligence, they cannot see any use in solving any scientific problem and they lack the imagination to realize that it is possible to both secure the network and also solve a scientific problem at the same time without compromising on either security or scientific advancement.-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
I appreciate your dedication to furthering your education through a Ph.D. program. It's evident that you value the depth of knowledge and expertise it offers. While I do agree that a Ph.D. holds significance in certain domains, I believe intelligence manifests itself in various ways and cannot be solely measured by one's educational attainment.
-Um. Most people on this site yell at me because I have made it through the Ph.D. program, and I do not like flattery because it is really fake. Understanding that Bitcoin has a mining algorithm that was never designed to advance science is one of those ways that one can exhibit its intelligence. But since the Bitcoin community does not understand this, it is clear that the Bitcoin community lacks intelligence.Regarding the topic of Bitcoin and its mining algorithm, it's interesting to see how advancements in technology can be used in different fields. While the primary purpose of Bitcoin's mining algorithm may not be specifically to advance science, it's worth acknowledging the potential for technological innovations to contribute to scientific progress indirectly.
-And yet the Bitcoin community rejects scientific advancement for absolutely no reason at all because the Bitcoin community is so mentally inept.Instead of debating our respective levels of intelligence, I believe it's more productive to engage in discussions where we can learn from each other's perspectives and expand our knowledge collectively. Let's focus on fostering a respectful and enriching conversation. Do you have any other insights or thoughts you'd like to share?
-Um. I cannot debate the people here. Debating requires both sides to have a certain level of intelligence. This is like trying to debate a newborn baby. I can however flat out tell the people here that they lack intelligence. It is their responsibility to trust me because I am smart enough to know what is best for them. I have tried to have a respectful conversation but the people on this site are too dense and angry to communicate with about anything because there is something dangerously wrong with them.-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
Again, congratulations on completing your Ph.D. program! It's understandable that you appreciate genuine discussions rather than flattery. Regarding Bitcoin's mining algorithm, it's important to remember that its primary purpose was to secure transactions and provide a decentralized monetary system. However, I believe intelligence encompasses different fields of knowledge, and although not everyone may fully grasp the intricacies of Bitcoin's algorithm, it doesn't necessarily imply a lack of intelligence within the community. Open dialogue and sharing insights can help bridge gaps in understanding. What are your thoughts on potential intersections between Bitcoin and scientific advancements?
I appreciate your dedication to furthering your education through a Ph.D. program. It's evident that you value the depth of knowledge and expertise it offers. While I do agree that a Ph.D. holds significance in certain domains, I believe intelligence manifests itself in various ways and cannot be solely measured by one's educational attainment.
-Um. Most people on this site yell at me because I have made it through the Ph.D. program, and I do not like flattery because it is really fake. Understanding that Bitcoin has a mining algorithm that was never designed to advance science is one of those ways that one can exhibit its intelligence. But since the Bitcoin community does not understand this, it is clear that the Bitcoin community lacks intelligence.Regarding the topic of Bitcoin and its mining algorithm, it's interesting to see how advancements in technology can be used in different fields. While the primary purpose of Bitcoin's mining algorithm may not be specifically to advance science, it's worth acknowledging the potential for technological innovations to contribute to scientific progress indirectly.
-And yet the Bitcoin community rejects scientific advancement for absolutely no reason at all because the Bitcoin community is so mentally inept.Instead of debating our respective levels of intelligence, I believe it's more productive to engage in discussions where we can learn from each other's perspectives and expand our knowledge collectively. Let's focus on fostering a respectful and enriching conversation. Do you have any other insights or thoughts you'd like to share?
-Um. I cannot debate the people here. Debating requires both sides to have a certain level of intelligence. This is like trying to debate a newborn baby. I can however flat out tell the people here that they lack intelligence. It is their responsibility to trust me because I am smart enough to know what is best for them. I have tried to have a respectful conversation but the people on this site are too dense and angry to communicate with about anything because there is something dangerously wrong with them.-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
I spent 4 years in the Ph.D. program. I have no regrets about getting the degree because anyone can get a B.S. degree, but a Ph.D. is better. How can you not know this? Well, I am smarter than you because unlike you, I realize that Bitcoin has a mining algorithm that was never designed to advance science.
I appreciate your dedication to furthering your education through a Ph.D. program. It's evident that you value the depth of knowledge and expertise it offers. While I do agree that a Ph.D. holds significance in certain domains, I believe intelligence manifests itself in various ways and cannot be solely measured by one's educational attainment.
Regarding the topic of Bitcoin and its mining algorithm, it's interesting to see how advancements in technology can be used in different fields. While the primary purpose of Bitcoin's mining algorithm may not be specifically to advance science, it's worth acknowledging the potential for technological innovations to contribute to scientific progress indirectly.
Instead of debating our respective levels of intelligence, I believe it's more productive to engage in discussions where we can learn from each other's perspectives and expand our knowledge collectively. Let's focus on fostering a respectful and enriching conversation. Do you have any other insights or thoughts you'd like to share?
Most people are really dumb.
Do you know one can be educated and still be dumb, going to school does not make people intelligent in reasoning and be able to handle things. School is more about to get understanding about a particular field and to get certificate for the numbers of exams written for the discipline. Their are some people who pass through from college sometimes their way of reasoning is very poor that their degree can't even reflect in their character content.College degrees do not even prove that students passed their exams because colleges pander to the students who make violent threats against their professors, and colleges do not even acknowledge any wrongdoing for this. You can't trust people with college degrees. You just can't. Only the Ph.D. is trustworthy.
There is absolutely nothing stupider than people who fork out 100,000 a year to go to some stupid ass college when the colleges pander to students who make threats of violence against their professors. People with student loan debt seriously need to be locked up in debtor's prisons.
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
Most people are really dumb.
Do you know one can be educated and still be dumb, going to school does not make people intelligent in reasoning and be able to handle things. School is more about to get understanding about a particular field and to get certificate for the numbers of exams written for the discipline. Their are some people who pass through from college sometimes their way of reasoning is very poor that their degree can't even reflect in their character content.
I spent 4 years in the Ph.D. program. I have no regrets about getting the degree because anyone can get a B.S. degree, but a Ph.D. is better. How can you not know this? Well, I am smarter than you because unlike you, I realize that Bitcoin has a mining algorithm that was never designed to advance science.
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
How many years did you spent to get PHD? are you un-comfort for spending that time for degree?
Jump to: