I do believe I need 10gpm @ 15ft of hea. For expansion and some margin of safety in flow rates (due to balancing) I would prefer 20gpm or as high as economically possible @ 15 feet of head. Remember each rig is in parallel so 10gpm across the mainline is only 1.5gpm across the server if the minimum of 6 servers are used. If that is expanded to 10 servers (~32 GH/s) for a full rack it is only 10 gpm mainline = 1 gpm per server.
I already used a flow/pressure calculator:
The server has 4.2ft of head loss (@ 2gpm) measured by me.
remember 8 GPUs worth of blocks in serial is rather restrictive this isn't your "normal" loop.
As I don't have a manifold yet I am reserving 1.0 ft of head loss for the manifold (and various fittings).
The heat exchanger has 2.2ft of head loss at 20gpm (thankfully it has 1" inlets and 8x 3/8" copper branches).
The mainline as planned is 70ft of 1" PEX. At 20gpm that is ~8ft of head loss.
4.2 + 1.0 + 2.2 + 8 ~= 15ft.
So options:
Options 1) Could use a pair of radiators in parallel to reduce the flow across each and the corresponding head loss. At 10 gpm the head loss is only ~ 1 ft. Still I doubt that saves much money when you consider the additional cost of 2nd radiator and fan assembly.
Option 2) Use a less restrictive mainline. 1" PEX is just so cheap and easy to use. Going to 1.25" CVPC is an option but a lot more work installing.
Option 3) I could just accept lower flow across each rig but I worry that if I go that route flow isn't going to be perfectly balanced and one rig ends up getting too low of a flow. That would require either putting in expensive balancing valves on the manifold or buying a larger pump.
Given those options I would rather not skimp on the pump and end up needing to waste time and money putting a second radiator in parallel, dropping in balancing valves, or re plumbing a larger mainline (1" PEX = $0.80 per foot. 1.5" PEX = $3 per foot
). Going "cheap" on the pump may save $100 or so but it may end up costing three times that in extra work and modifications.
On evaporative cooler:I don't think any home grown evaporative cooler is going to handle 7KW of heatload. Regardless the summers in southern VA approach 90% humidity so I think a forced fan heat exchanger is going to be superior for year round operation.
I don't mind looking at alternative brands I just haven't found anything that gives me what I need for less. No doubt it likely exists so if you have a pump model in mind I am all ears. I have found some industrial pumps but they tend to be lower efficiency and dump as much as 500w into the loop which make them useless.
Your thoughts?