If you want someone to reasonably tag these, then you need more than very circumstantial proof. I mean, I could attempt to analyze the behavioral pattern of each of these users and then make a (personal) conclusion as to whether they should be tagged or not. However, this would take up too much time / would not be worth the effort. Therefore, I suggest that you try finding better proof (e.g. changes in the local boards that the user posts). Additionally, I suggest that you better format the list and avoid using fonts that are very large.
Thanks alot for your reply Lauda!
I took your advice, and will only add accounts that suddenly start posting on local boards that has never been used before.
Do you consider personally that being enough proof for a sold/hacked account?
Im still a starter on this type of thing, and i appreciate every tip that is given to me.
Seems like most accounts on that have been potentially sold/hacked, start posting on turkish local boards.
I'll add
Haveibeenpwned just incase to the OP, so if people see this thread, they can see if their accounts are potentially in danger.
Edit: And by posting on local boards, i mean account that woke up from a long period of inactivity (1-5 years or so on) and has made alot of posts on local boards recently that account has never been used to post on. Many of the accounts listed have only been used on the english boards before inactivity.