Pages:
Author

Topic: A new lower standard on max post quota for weekly paid campaigns - page 2. (Read 368 times)

hero member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 738
Mixing reinvented for your privacy | chipmixer.com
Long story short: It's a good initiative. But you should know that lower weekly post quota does not mean higher quality posts. It's all dependant on the person.
true but at least it helps reduce unnecessary spam posts, compare to higher weekly minimum post requirement
and with fix payment scheme like that, participants don't need to chase for maximum post to get more payout
they could spend time to concentrate more on the quality of their posts, just like the OP said

one thing I notice is these campaigns are paying with fixed $ rate instead of BTC amount/post/week
that would be slightly a disadvantage from participants perspective when BTC price is rising
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1302
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
This isn't a general reduction on the number of weekly posts to be made, this is two campaigns handled by the same user(Hamphuz)and probably based on his agreements with the project company decided on 15 posts, he could manage a bounty tomorrow and it'll be 25 posts, there's nothing fixed, the weekly posts for those campaigns could even increase in the second week.

If you wish to know why he reduced the number of posts per week, you can go to him via pm, as far as we are concerned there is no enforcement for the reduction of weekly posts in the forum.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1329
Stultorum infinitus est numerus
Relatively low amount of member slots in comparison to other campaigns and lower pay too. Also, I just want to add on that lower weekly post-quota does not mean that their shitpost ratio will go down. This is especially important on Local boards. Most members of this forum know English at various levels so we have a lot of people reporting content that's on the global forum, on top of having multiple moderators. Unfortunately, however, local boards do not have these reassuring elements. Even after Yahoo's and other members contribution to the ban list of Cryptotalk shitposters, there are still a lot spamming away.

Long story short: It's a good initiative. But you should know that lower weekly post quota does not mean higher quality posts. It's all dependant on the person.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Look at how many open spots there are. This is the free market at work.
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 4085
Farewell o_e_l_e_o
I woke up today, and saw updating posts in Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns [Last update: 28-Oct-2019]. Those updating posts announced there are two new campaigns from Hhampuz.

I already in one of Hhampuz's campaign but I am curious what are his new ones, then I visited bounty threads and checked.

Amazingly, both two campaigns have very low weekly post quota, only 15 in total. To be honest with you all, it is my first time I saw weekly paid campaigns that have required post quota that require only 15 posts each week.

Blender.io
Make a minimum of 15 constructive posts each week that you participate to be eligible for a Payout. (Posts need to be at least 200 characters long).

Smartmixer
Make a minimum of 15 constructive posts each week that you participate to be eligible for a Payout. (Posts need to be at least 150 characters long).

I don't talk about campaign which does not require a minimum post weekly like ChipMixer, it is an outlier in the forum.

It is unclear why Hhampuz decided to change weekly quota (previously his campaigns and most of campaigns from other managers, usually require 25 posts weekly). Personally, I think it is very good change because it will give participants more time to make better posts. They don't have to make posts to satisfy post quota (at 25, as previously), and it will potentially increase their post quality.

I know accepted participants in those campaigns are surely good posters and it is rarely or unlikely to see them making shit posts.
Anyway, lower weekly post quota will boost their post quality in average.

You rocked, Hhampuz!
Pages:
Jump to: