Pages:
Author

Topic: A new name for mining - page 2. (Read 8095 times)

legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003
March 08, 2013, 08:17:37 AM
#18
Currently there's still more than 10% inflation per year because of _mining_. Once this number falls below 1% or so, you might want to call it something else, but at the moment the main income of miners is creating NEW coins, not auditing transactions.

You miss what is important. Being allowed to issue coins does not matter to Bitcoin and with it alone Bitcoin fails miserably. It's the validating of transactions part which keeps Bitcoin functioning, the issuing of new bitcoins and fees are just the benefits.
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1007
March 08, 2013, 08:06:04 AM
#17
Currently there's still more than 10% inflation per year because of _mining_. Once this number falls below 1% or so, you might want to call it something else, but at the moment the main income of miners is creating NEW coins, not auditing transactions.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Another block in the wall
March 08, 2013, 08:05:14 AM
#16
When talking to newbies I describe the network as a collection of independent auditors, who verify all the transactions in return for a small fee. Then later on I might use the word mining and compare it to gold/silver once they roughly understand the concept.

'Ok, that's good and all, but where do I get coins?'............From the independent auditors?
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003
March 08, 2013, 07:58:28 AM
#15
When talking to newbies I describe the network as a collection of independent auditors, who verify all the transactions in return for a small fee. Then later on I might use the word mining and compare it to gold/silver once they roughly understand the concept.

This really should be the go to phrase and way of introducing new people to mining, many say it and I agree that it's the easiest to grasp.
sr. member
Activity: 250
Merit: 250
March 08, 2013, 07:54:57 AM
#14
When talking to newbies I describe the network as a collection of independent auditors, who verify all the transactions in return for a small fee. Then later on I might use the word mining and compare it to gold/silver once they roughly understand the concept.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003
March 08, 2013, 07:52:36 AM
#13
Mike Hearn want's us to believe it should be called "Heating, inefficient but with a few added benefits!"  Cheesy
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Another block in the wall
March 08, 2013, 07:49:38 AM
#12
some have been proposing "auditing".
Good approximation of a descriptor but the Scientology connotations...?

This person has a point....
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 506
March 08, 2013, 07:48:02 AM
#11
some have been proposing "auditing".
Good approximation of a descriptor but the Scientology connotations...?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Another block in the wall
March 08, 2013, 07:43:54 AM
#10
Lets try a new name for Satoshi while we're at it....................Oh, and the BTC logo, we SOoo need to change that too.

Hashing?........What!?.  "Sorry, I don't do drugs"
sr. member
Activity: 412
Merit: 250
March 08, 2013, 07:43:28 AM
#9
'Transaction validation/processing' may be more accurate, but it lacks the simple appeal of 'mining' imo. Renaming such a widely used term would be extremely difficult in any case.
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
March 08, 2013, 07:38:46 AM
#8
Hmm...




Would this be better?
full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 100
March 08, 2013, 07:13:20 AM
#7
Quote
How about ... winning

hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 587
Space Lord
March 08, 2013, 06:49:25 AM
#6
How about

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1007
March 08, 2013, 06:31:35 AM
#5
some have been proposing "auditing".

it seems to me that the term "mining" indeed has always been kind of unfortunate. It makes people suspicious ("what ?!? Huh free money with the graphics card ?!?? Huh"), especially gold bugs ("that crap is not _real_ money !!!1!! and they say _mine_ it !!! like gold !!!1! ridiculous !!!1!").

something like "auditing" is much more neutral, and it's more intuitive to understand that users get rewarded for running hardware and software that is auditing transactions.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1722
March 08, 2013, 04:26:05 AM
#4
How about ''accountants''?
hero member
Activity: 752
Merit: 500
bitcoin hodler
March 08, 2013, 04:25:00 AM
#3
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
March 08, 2013, 04:18:37 AM
#2
How about "mining?"
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1111
March 08, 2013, 04:12:55 AM
#1
I think the word "mining" does not really reflect the nature of the work. As we have moved to ASIC era, mining will become a more specialized activity and no longer a way to attract new users. To make it sounds more professional, I think we should rename it to "transaction validation"/"transaction processing", and miners to "transaction validators"/"transaction processors".

Any thought?
Pages:
Jump to: