Pages:
Author

Topic: a new strategy for dice (all or nothing or double or nothing!) - page 3. (Read 1520 times)

hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 510
Ya right win or die. I did try this with my profit i was like let's try with 0.1 btc. I went all in and what happened i lost. This is obviously best with faucet only and some sites offer 10 times claim per day. But i don't think i have the same luck with dice sites now which i had few months ago.
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1011
to the two posters above:
why are you calling it "reverse martingale" because from what i read once about martingale and its reverse. the reverse version is when you start with max amount and if you win you put the same amount again and if you lose you decrease the amount. and it actually is called reverse because you decrease it not increase the amount like martingale.
or am i missing something?

to OP
i have to try this, it should be fun Wink

To what I know reverse martingale is the opposite version of martingale itself. With martingale, we increase our bet size after a loss while with the reverse version we increase our bet size after a win. In reverse martingale, we have to reset our bet size to it initial value after we hit couple of greens. Both martingale and reverse martingale have their own risk.
I did not know that was called reverse martingale, that seems like is less risky in the long term if after a few wins you go back to your original bet and the only reason that seems less risky is because you are not going to lose your entire bankroll in a single roll of a dice.
If we get more greens in a row, then it is profitable, but it is not possible in a dice game. After hitting 4 or 5 greens, we again get one red colour. So this is never ending the story. You will make a profit and the same way you will lose all winnings in a single bet. I think this strategy will not work. Martingale method is ok, but reverse martingale is not worth.
hero member
Activity: 2814
Merit: 734
Bitcoin is GOD
to the two posters above:
why are you calling it "reverse martingale" because from what i read once about martingale and its reverse. the reverse version is when you start with max amount and if you win you put the same amount again and if you lose you decrease the amount. and it actually is called reverse because you decrease it not increase the amount like martingale.
or am i missing something?

to OP
i have to try this, it should be fun Wink

To what I know reverse martingale is the opposite version of martingale itself. With martingale, we increase our bet size after a loss while with the reverse version we increase our bet size after a win. In reverse martingale, we have to reset our bet size to it initial value after we hit couple of greens. Both martingale and reverse martingale have their own risk.
I did not know that was called reverse martingale, that seems like is less risky in the long term if after a few wins you go back to your original bet and the only reason that seems less risky is because you are not going to lose your entire bankroll in a single roll of a dice.
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
To be honest, i've seen lots of people share/use similar trick by claim faucet then bet everything or use auto-roll bot. I also tried this strategy when casino still offer more than 1000 satoshi easily and i saw many people could earn 1 mBTC to 50 mBTC depends on their luckiness.
Even now, i still see few people doing this for hours only to earn 1 mBTC or less Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 655
The strategy is too aggressive in my opinion
i agree, and that is what makes it interesting Smiley

Going double or nothing is perhaps a good way to lose fast but hitting enough wins in a row so you can withdraw from a single faucet claim is just too unlikely.
it is a lose fast win fast kind of strategy in my opinion. to make it better, i believe it is best to come up with a number of rolls for example 10 to 15 and you never go above that number. and stop after it.

I remember once I tried to gamble on multiple gambling sites at a time. Opened 4 or 5 dice gambling sites then I went for betting all the faucet amounts to do or die kind of attempts. If I keep on winning I will be sticking with one site otherwise I will switch over to next one and will do bet with all faucet amount and keep repeating the steps and finally come back to the first site and claim faucet and then continued.

This is a good way to kill our time and nothing else. When we are sure about we will lose everything at the end, I believe no gambler will be finding fun with it like what I have concluded.
i liked the name, so i am going to call it "roll or die".
but i don't like the opening of multiple sites. it is going to take all my time then. i am doing other things while i make bets for example i am reading bitcointalk and making some posts then i go make a bet then i go check my orders in the exchange to make some trades and ....

to the two posters above:
why are you calling it "reverse martingale" because from what i read once about martingale and its reverse. the reverse version is when you start with max amount and if you win you put the same amount again and if you lose you decrease the amount. and it actually is called reverse because you decrease it not increase the amount like martingale.
or am i missing something?

to OP
i have to try this, it should be fun Wink

this is correct, reverse martingale is different.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martingale_%28betting_system%29#Anti-martingale
hero member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 504
Instead of loosing easy by easy it is much better to place few big bets and get whatever you want to do. I was doing sometimes ago aggressive gambling by doing believe in all in or go home. If the purpose of gambling is more fun and less to make money then careful gambling is always suitable.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1000
to the two posters above:
why are you calling it "reverse martingale" because from what i read once about martingale and its reverse. the reverse version is when you start with max amount and if you win you put the same amount again and if you lose you decrease the amount. and it actually is called reverse because you decrease it not increase the amount like martingale.
or am i missing something?

to OP
i have to try this, it should be fun Wink

To what I know reverse martingale is the opposite version of martingale itself. With martingale, we increase our bet size after a loss while with the reverse version we increase our bet size after a win. In reverse martingale, we have to reset our bet size to it initial value after we hit couple of greens. Both martingale and reverse martingale have their own risk.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1004
This is the strategy (I'd rather call it a method) I usually use when I am bored and ready to claim some Dice faucet.
I tried it many times, and so far only once managed to win enough to be able to withdraw bitcoin from PrimeDice.
It is definitely fun - mainly because it is risky, and I would never try that with with high rolls.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
Bazinga!
to the two posters above:
why are you calling it "reverse martingale" because from what i read once about martingale and its reverse. the reverse version is when you start with max amount and if you win you put the same amount again and if you lose you decrease the amount. and it actually is called reverse because you decrease it not increase the amount like martingale.
or am i missing something?

to OP
i have to try this, it should be fun Wink
hero member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 517
That was simply your lucky day! What you are doing in effect is to maximize your faucet harvest and you will need to come prepared with tons of patience, because most days you would hardly go beyond your nose and I think the time it takes from you to baby sit all that can be put into something much more productive and if that turns out your routine source for getting money out of a casino, most would complain or simply lock you out.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001
disclaimers before everyone kills me here:
1. this is not a new strategy, i know. it is a new strategy that "I" am using today.
2. it is not supposed to be good, 100% win,... it is supposed to be fun and exhilarating Tongue
3. i am sharing it here for fun purposes because i believe gambling should all be about fun and nothing else.
4. i am using faucet, you can too. but it can also be done with bankroll or with any amount.

here it goes:
- i claim faucet
- starting amount is max faucet amount but it can be a portion of it to prevent waiting for timer.
- multiplier is on 2x
- on lose back to start (another faucet or other portion of the first faucet)
- (here is the twist) on win switch between hi and lo and click max amount again then roll

i think the strategy is called double or nothing or something like that.

i have had pretty good runs on switching between hi and lo before but never did all in with max amount. so this is also a new part for me.

if you tried this strategy, share how long you went and how much fun you had.

Seems a reverse martingale for me.  I had used this method, this is kinda fun but well one lost can take your winning away but if you got a 5+ winning streak, it will really give you a good amount of profit.  This need a forced stop to book a winning.  If you let yourself play continuously, you will lose at the end.
This is sounds like normal martingale, not a reverse. Oh my, yes, this is reverse martingale (double your money when you win). All you do just bet all your faucet until you hit good winning streak and if you lose, you will start again from faucet. If you got 5 winning streak from your faucet (~1000-2000 satoshis= you only get 32000 satoshi (that's still not enough if you want withdraw your winning. We know mostly all gambling sites have min withdrawal around 0.001-0.002BTC)
@Red-Apple, i had tried this and the highest i can reach only 0.00128 BTC from 0.00001 BTCOr you can see this winning streaks from faucet Wink
haha... Just looked through some old pd photos and guess what i found... Cheesy ...


For all the people that say you will never get some greens in a row....




What a run Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1153
disclaimers before everyone kills me here:
1. this is not a new strategy, i know. it is a new strategy that "I" am using today.
2. it is not supposed to be good, 100% win,... it is supposed to be fun and exhilarating Tongue
3. i am sharing it here for fun purposes because i believe gambling should all be about fun and nothing else.
4. i am using faucet, you can too. but it can also be done with bankroll or with any amount.

here it goes:
- i claim faucet
- starting amount is max faucet amount but it can be a portion of it to prevent waiting for timer.
- multiplier is on 2x
- on lose back to start (another faucet or other portion of the first faucet)
- (here is the twist) on win switch between hi and lo and click max amount again then roll

i think the strategy is called double or nothing or something like that.

i have had pretty good runs on switching between hi and lo before but never did all in with max amount. so this is also a new part for me.

if you tried this strategy, share how long you went and how much fun you had.

Seems a reverse martingale for me.  I had used this method, this is kinda fun but well one lost can take your winning away but if you got a 5+ winning streak, it will really give you a good amount of profit.  This need a forced stop to book a winning.  If you let yourself play continuously, you will lose at the end.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
That is really a very fun to do all in a dice site especially when you get some bits on that site from their faucet but my own money I do not like to go all in because I want to play for a longer time to get entertained.
hero member
Activity: 1302
Merit: 540
Honestly experience this method before but its not fun for me you have low happiness if you use faucet because if you full bet you lose.. .
But sometimes if you do that you can nearly make i think 90k sat or more if you do this step..
So i think if you want to reach minimum withdrawal you should depost and do this method but don't be greedy it can turn you lose it all..
that's what killing the fun when you become greedy this strategy is only adding your enjoyment its testing your luck what if you
will able to win huge amount by using only faucets and with making all in allows you to win 100k sat, surely it will be fun and
enjoying experience.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Massive price drop coming...
Honestly experience this method before but its not fun for me you have low happiness if you use faucet because if you full bet you lose.. .
But sometimes if you do that you can nearly make i think 90k sat or more if you do this step..
So i think if you want to reach minimum withdrawal you should depost and do this method but don't be greedy it can turn you lose it all..
hero member
Activity: 1722
Merit: 528
A strategy and yet it called "all or nothing".

Sometimes as we play on dice sites, we are creating some sort of techniques and startegy so that we can think that it will increase our chances of winning. If we win, then it's effective in our part. If it's loss then we will make again another strategy and the process just repeats. No need for sarcastic response as OP put some disclaimer as a header lol. Smiley

If people found this as good and worth to shot then just follow at your own risk. We have working minds to think in the first place. Smiley

Points Taken. Strategies can only make your Gambling Activities really fun, unless you lose a lot, yes. But with these strategies you are like making a charge in a war with something up your sleeves. But the thing is, whether you have a strategy or or none, there are always two results that will come up, it's either you lose or win. It will not change the fact thatyou may end up with these two, because if strategies are really effective, noone is trying to make a gambling site for a living.
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 511
I remember once I tried to gamble on multiple gambling sites at a time. Opened 4 or 5 dice gambling sites then I went for betting all the faucet amounts to do or die kind of attempts. If I keep on winning I will be sticking with one site otherwise I will switch over to next one and will do bet with all faucet amount and keep repeating the steps and finally come back to the first site and claim faucet and then continued.

This is a good way to kill our time and nothing else. When we are sure about we will lose everything at the end, I believe no gambler will be finding fun with it like what I have concluded.
asu
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1136
Nice i tried your stragety and it works fine for e and its coll. Noce first the first try it win and win win, obvoiusly your right its funny to use this type of stragety because it doesn't need to deposit jist try it for faucet and it will came up nice hahaha. I like your stragety i feel comfortable using this type of shady and funny strat.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1065
Undeads.com - P2E Runner Game
A strategy and yet it called "all or nothing".

Sometimes as we play on dice sites, we are creating some sort of techniques and startegy so that we can think that it will increase our chances of winning. If we win, then it's effective in our part. If it's loss then we will make again another strategy and the process just repeats. No need for sarcastic response as OP put some disclaimer as a header lol. Smiley

If people found this as good and worth to shot then just follow at your own risk. We have working minds to think in the first place. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1398
For support ➡️ help.bc.game
A strategy with a little bit of designed to make them cool. Smiley Well that is OP's own strategy so if ever that is effective to him just let it like that way and for others up to you follow. We all know that there is no strategy that can give a decent profit in playing dice.

On the first phase of betting, clearly it was a randomized shot (obviously) and we must understand that all bets are under the provably fair system so whatever injections or modifications we made, once the result was given by calculations then it was the thing must happened.
Pages:
Jump to: