What is the minimum workable network configuration?
For example, in Bitcoin you just need a single node and it can mine blocks already. In Delegated Proof of Stake, as I understand it, you need minimum 3 delegate.
What is it for the described consensus case?
Topic: A new type of consensus protocol (Read 279 times)
updated with new node names. 
redrew the pictures
and other modifications
https://github.com/yj1190590/POnD/blob/master/README_eng.md
redrew the pictures
and other modifications
https://github.com/yj1190590/POnD/blob/master/README_eng.md
Nice idea, but could you please explain in easy words which problems your new protocol solves and how. And yes, the concept with bees and flowers is not really "geeky". 
this may help to explain
https://github.com/yj1190590/POnD/blob/master/README_eng.md#benifits
there is an arrow after each clause.
Nice idea, but could you please explain in easy words which problems your new protocol solves and how. And yes, the concept with bees and flowers is not really "geeky".
Nothing. There was also a project in the past that I have found very funny called Dragonchain. The founder said that it would have 6 different types of layered nodes to which I found funny lol. But he was also serious about the project and even said that it was supported by Disneyland which I also found funny lol.
Are you serious? I am getting the giggles when I see the flower and the honeycomb in the diagram. I assume the worker is the bee gathering the honey then lol?
Nothing. There was also a project in the past that I have found very funny called Dragonchain. The founder said that it would have 6 different types of layered nodes to which I found funny lol. But he was also serious about the project and even said that it was supported by Disneyland which I also found funny lol.
If you do even simplest prototype, it'll be perceived much more positively. Also, it could bring more understanding to the implementor and, actually, affect the original writing.
Reasonable. It is necessary to make the prototype and do some experiments with it.But I honesly don't have the time or programming skill to do it alone.
And before that , I must do some feasibility study and preliminary work of the project.
That's why I am trying to explain the theory and the project plan to you.
If they proves feasible, I hope to find someone to work with.
Have you written any code yet?
no.It is at the Design Stage yet.
Coding it ought to be a team work.
If you do even simplest prototype, it'll be perceived much more positively. Also, it could bring more understanding to the implementor and, actually, affect the original writing.
Have you written any code yet?
no.It is at the Design Stage yet.
Coding it ought to be a team work.
Have you written any code yet?
Reedited for readers to understand the central idea quickly.
Translation completed. thank nuszjj
I think I can understand what he means. It is of course your only view, but if you posted it here, I guess, you want opinions then. Honeycombs and Flower are, probably, not sounding very serious for some people and in some languages. I'm not the one to giving advices or something, but you might be want some more dramatic? Like Thunder and Lightning? Or Fortress and Army?
Thank you for your opinion!I don't want any dramatic, but I have to give those nodes names.
I thought it would be better if those names help understand what their functions are.
If there is any misunderstanding of those names, I am sorry about that, please ignor them and read on.
They are just names.
Are you serious? I am getting the giggles when I see the flower and the honeycomb in the diagram. I assume the worker is the bee gathering the honey then lol?
I think I can understand what he means. It is of course your only view, but if you posted it here, I guess, you want opinions then. Honeycombs and Flower are, probably, not sounding very serious for some people and in some languages. I'm not the one to giving advices or something, but you might be want some more dramatic? Like Thunder and Lightning? Or Fortress and Army?
Are you serious? I am getting the giggles when I see the flower and the honeycomb in the diagram. I assume the worker is the bee gathering the honey then lol?
The network scheme is shown as below:
Are you serious? I am getting the giggles when I see the flower and the honeycomb in the diagram. I assume the worker is the bee gathering the honey then lol?
Do you have thoughts on a transition strategy that takes into account the vested interests of existing miners in the Bitcoin network? (money, equipment, energy, location) after all, they are the ones to be tempted in a more environmental direction. At this point i am more interested in a tempting transition strategy than any secure principle... in my opinion this needs to be a slow transition over many years where hashing is phased out... Thanks for the post!
I 'm afraid I have not thought that way.But they can at least stop spending more money into it.
Do you have thoughts on a transition strategy that takes into account the vested interests of existing miners in the Bitcoin network? (money, equipment, energy, location) after all, they are the ones to be tempted in a more environmental direction. At this point i am more interested in a tempting transition strategy than any secure principle... in my opinion this needs to be a slow transition over many years where hashing is phased out... Thanks for the post!
Figure 2: Process of block generation vote and validation
As shown in the scheme above, the system will count votes in certain existing blocks and the honeycomb with maximum votes can have the highest chance to win the competition.
Figure 3: Process of main chain vote and validation
As shown in the scheme above, whenever there is any fork, the transactions will also vote for the branch, which determines the number of votes (stakes) for different branches in the next voting, i.e. the amount of block generation difficulty parameter Y is determined. Thus, the more votes one branch can get, the faster it will be to generate the next block, and the faster broadcast is helpful to gain more votes in the next round. This process will increase the gap between these two branches and determine the main chain in short time.
Jump to: