We all have different opinions on games and he have clearly showed us his own view of the game but what I don’t understand is why he would take such risk and stake on Arsenal to win despite watching how terrible Arsenal was in the first half, their entire midfield bullied and overshadowed by South American combo Enzo Fernandez and Moises Caicedo who also got help from Conor Gallagher. Chelsea’s midfield was rock solid throughout the game which was why it was difficult for Arsenal to penetrate them and their most creative midfielder Odegaard was lost throughout the game. Merely seeing Arsenal’s performance in the first should have made him know he was making a wrong decision and winning Chelsea at stamford bridge will be a difficult task.
In my opinion Arsenal was even lucky to have draw the game and had it been Chelsea converted their chances it would’ve been a different story.
In my opinion Arsenal was even lucky to have draw the game and had it been Chelsea converted their chances it would’ve been a different story.
I think wealthy people usually have the notion that bigger risks brings bigger rewards if successful so they often go for endeavors with bigger risks. I think this is very similar to how Drake picks his games at stake. I believe that even though they lose several bet slips, one win can cover many of their losses. Risks is an appetizer for them afaik.
In this guys own case, 5 m in naira means nothing much to him and as a matter of fact, he can and will make that money through another bet, and he should be cool with it, it is only a problem if he has some close member of his family still living in poverty and he wastes such an amount.
