My question is why projects don't pay in fiat in the bouny Hunters?why bounty Hunters need to wait and need to exercise patient to wait for the tokens to have value? And at the same time no tokens has been profitable. Thats my questions why is it the management did not pay in bounty Hunters well who works to promote it.
because bounty hunters are the last people the project cares about. they are not interested in the opinions of those people who are promoting the project
In fact, a Bounty Hunter may also be an investor who is interested in developing a specific project. Nevertheless, the Bounty Hunter is an employee who must receive his remuneration for the work done. One way or another, the Bounty company goes through and the work is done, and the team in any case must pay for the work of the Bounty hunter. For example, if people work at the enterprise, but they are not paid a salary, then people start to rebel. No matter what the administration of the enterprise does, people should receive their salary for the work done.
Because the developers are not for real, they are just around to try to collect funding and then right after the sale period is over the team will runaway with the money.
Real developers are concern with everyone's opinions not just the investors but also with the team who helping them to promote and attract investors. If there's no appeal every recommendation from the bounty participants, chances that the project is not willing to accept opinions for further improvement.
I really liked what you said, because each member of the team that works for the good of the project should be accordingly rewarded. For some reason, everyone speaks very badly about Bounty hunters, but if the project developers run a Bounty company, then it is very important for the team to resort to the services of Bounty hunters. To a greater extent, the team is unprofessional and therefore the project is developing poorly, and for some reason everyone blames the participants in the Bounty companies.