This thread has been edited and captured via archive.is and two other capturing websites just in case it gets deleted.
https://archive.is/jyYN9https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/updated-list-of-all-signon-signature-spammers-1263464https://archive.is/qvlSs https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1223138.60Lauda, this post you made
Not exactly. It is much different when people are not part of a signature campaign. Those who are in them, tend to spam in order to get money which is wrong. However, those that are not part of one do not have such an incentive. It is much harder to judge and just because someone has low quality posts (again, no signature campaign) that doesn't necessarily mean that they are spamming. Not everyone can write and contribute as much as the next person. Note: I haven't looked into any individual listed here.
Does not match up with this post you made in regards to codishmumu's ban:
That person deserved it, probably even more. It's quite rare that we encounter someone who spams so much without a campaign, where 99.9% posts are useless. Anyone who comes here just to constantly make useless posts in the off-topic section is not welcome. This is a forum primarily focused on Bitcoin.
They were proven to post things that helped Bitcoin according to their business partner. Here are the posts. I have screencapped them just in case they get deleted. For now, the original links will do.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/end-the-negative-appearance-of-bitcoin-and-bitcointalk-1223138https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/do-you-believe-we-need-more-ways-of-advertising-bitcoin-currency-1199258https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/should-bitcoins-logo-color-be-gold-and-not-orange-1211674https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/how-do-you-feel-about-the-negative-reputation-of-the-bitcoin-currency-1202719UPDATE: Lauda even mentioned that he doesn't want a post restriction in this thread I posted:
https://archive.is/sMEdRIt is even more contradicting that they would post that when they said that they didn't appreciate someone who "spams so much". In that context, spam to Lauda meant posting too much. Wouldn't a post restriction prevent that?
Apparently, some other users have
indirectly vouched for codishmumu. "minifrji", a somehow trusted user posted this:
https://archive.is/C0NbyAccounts such as
Gleb's and
Phinnaeus's have a large amount of posts in Off Topic, but they have provided enough elsewhere to the forums to warrant it. Users that do nothing but spam in Off Topic shouldn't be here.
As proven in the links, she posts tons of useful ideas for the growth of Bitcoin and has been seen as vital. As minifriji just said, people can post a ton in off topic, but they should make some useful posts along the way. To confirm my research, I had made sure to make a poll asking people if people who post mostly in off topic should be banned, or if they want the off-topic forum deleted completely. Here's what the public voted:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/update-should-the-off-topic-forum-be-deleted-vote-now-1268829I'd like to conclude my thoughts with this quote she posted in someone's thread in regards to the possibility of Bitcoin ever becoming mainstream. You can see the direct link to the quote here:
https://archive.is/sMlF4It will be when I make my merchandise. Don't worry you guys. I'm gonna do everything in my power to make these items beautiful and jaw dropping to give wonderful advertisement for Satoshi's work. All you have to do is give me a chance. I love you all very much from the bottom of my heart because you've honestly given me concepts to believe in, and I'll honestly do anything to contribute to the growth of this currency.
One day, bitcoin will be worth one million USD each, and we can all enjoy our success together.
That sounds like someone who cares.
With that said, I'm just trying to ask for an explanation to Lauda's mismatched opinions. That's all. She's unbanned now, but I genuinely want an explanation before I let this go. Lauda might have to be stripped of staff label because it seems as though she/he is applying favorites based on whether or not they personally like the person. Apparently, codishmumu would never do that.
https://archive.is/PhbDR If we ever want to see bitcoin evolve, we gotta put personal feelings aside about others in the community, and work together to create ways to advance our business and make money to put food on the table for our families, and roofs over our heads for loved ones. It doesn't really make sense to not hire somebody who can perform a job perfectly to the highest extent just because you have personal hatred for them. Work life and personal life should be separate. People who do that are hurting their businesses.
Definitely professional.