Topic: A statistical table of bounty campaigns run on Bitcointalk - page 2. (Read 297 times)
Sorry there is no solution to bounty campaigns presently and if you are tired of not getting paid try to look for escrow paying platform like bountyhive, you will always get paid but there will be same delays like bounties on here
At this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/90-of-project-bounties-are-scams-5235688 the OP assume (no evidence provided) that 90% of bounty campaigns are scam. Most of comments agree with OP but there are still against opinions. Why we don't create a statistical table of bounty campaigns run on Bitcointalk to see the truth? Honestly I'm not good at mathematical statistics and don't know how to start with it, but some of you can do that. Guess that you will have free time to do that when you stay at home because of the virus ( i don't want to talk about it anymore). A table like that will stop the debate and maybe we will have some solutions for bounty campaigns, such as if a bounty manager had 90% of his campaigns scam, we put negative trust on him and call people don't join his campaign. not work.
Your idea will work if everyone are willing to cooperate especially the tool creator who can create the said tool, the forum moderators, the project owners, the bounty hunters and the investors. They are the most important individuals in every project but this is not a simple job and not easy to get approve because if it will be simple then there is already a tool or a thread that will purely guide all the bounty participants on what to join and on what to avoid. There are projects that became successful but in the end they end up scamming the money of the investors the same with the bounty participants so if we really want to report or take out those scammers we need to unite and do something that cannot be penetrated by the scammers.
At this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/90-of-project-bounties-are-scams-5235688 the OP assume (no evidence provided) that 90% of bounty campaigns are scam. Most of comments agree with OP but there are still against opinions. Why we don't create a statistical table of bounty campaigns run on Bitcointalk to see the truth? Honestly I'm not good at mathematical statistics and don't know how to start with it, but some of you can do that. Guess that you will have free time to do that when you stay at home because of the virus ( i don't want to talk about it anymore). A table like that will stop the debate and maybe we will have some solutions for bounty campaigns, such as if a bounty manager had 90% of his campaigns scam, we put negative trust on him and call people don't join his campaign. not work.
Guy we don't need a list failed projects, I won't do that because it's a complete waste of time to list scam or fake projects, there are too many scam projects on here and that's undeniable because many are aware of this I don't think I will create a statistics table unless you do it myself and I don't think I need statistics either because we see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=238.0 then we can see directly if there are too many now. scam project
We dont need an statistics for bounties we have here. Even those project that listed in exchange can be considered scam if they leave the project without development make after they collected the money and they only do is to list that token's in that exchange?
We cant call it as scam since its tradeable but its already a scam base on what they do to a project becuase they do not have any supporters even the project dont give any updates for the roadmap and leavinf it empty and tradeable.
His just voicing out his opinion and there is nothing wrong with that. 90% assuming isnt bad since he based it on his experienced but this will differ on each user on how they earn from certain campaigns. But your idea is also good gicing such statistic for potential rate. But the one who will make this should not be bias about his work. Also considered category on which campaigns he will rate cause there are lots of bounty in the past. Few takes, more are scams than legit. So I understand why the creator of that post said so.
if a bounty manager had 90% of his campaigns scam, we put negative trust on him and call people don't join his campaign.
Or what about we stop joining any campaign which has not escrowed the payment or hired a very reputed manager? That would be more easier than what you talked. If someone tags the scam bounty manager, people will still join their campaign. You can never resist them from that. That's what I am watching for this long time. Bounty hunters never consider anything. They blindly join on all the campaign.You're right. I just rethink that my suggestion will not work.
I don't like it when bounty managers are the ones being pinned with all the blame of bounty failure.
That is not cool at all.
Scammers can be so good that you won't even realize it.
If you are a veteran here you will understand it.
There are a lot of users here who have been a victim of a lot of scams that looks so perfect without any stain of an error.
Managers job is to keep the bounty hunters in a disciplined way which they would do their job in a right way.
They are not someone who is really a part of that ICO team.
Let us always consider that.
It is also our job as bounty hunters to dig deep into knowing if the ICO is a scam.
That is not cool at all.
Scammers can be so good that you won't even realize it.
If you are a veteran here you will understand it.
There are a lot of users here who have been a victim of a lot of scams that looks so perfect without any stain of an error.
Managers job is to keep the bounty hunters in a disciplined way which they would do their job in a right way.
They are not someone who is really a part of that ICO team.
Let us always consider that.
It is also our job as bounty hunters to dig deep into knowing if the ICO is a scam.
I don't think I will create a statistics table unless you do it myself and I don't think I need statistics either because we see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=238.0 then we can see directly if there are too many now. scam project
I agree about the statement that bounties should be escrowed and managed by a reputable bounty manager, however some team or project owners want to have to their bounty managed by themselves hence, it is really hard and there is no rules about it that it should be managed by a known one, well, campaign manager such as julerz always have the bounty escrowed but still we will never know if the project will succeed until the end of campaign, we might get paid but it is not an assurance of earning even a little until we see that it is listed to any exchange whether good or bad one.
if a bounty manager had 90% of his campaigns scam, we put negative trust on him and call people don't join his campaign.
Or what about we stop joining any campaign which has not escrowed the payment or hired a very reputed manager? That would be more easier than what you talked. If someone tags the scam bounty manager, people will still join their campaign. You can never resist them from that. That's what I am watching for this long time. Bounty hunters never consider anything. They blindly join on all the campaign.You're right. I just rethink that my suggestion will not work.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 2100
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
if a bounty manager had 90% of his campaigns scam, we put negative trust on him and call people don't join his campaign.
Or what about we stop joining any campaign which has not escrowed the payment or hired a very reputed manager? That would be more easier than what you talked. If someone tags the scam bounty manager, people will still join their campaign. You can never resist them from that. That's what I am watching for this long time. Bounty hunters never consider anything. They blindly join on all the campaign.
At this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/90-of-project-bounties-are-scams-5235688 the OP assume (no evidence provided) that 90% of bounty campaigns are scam. Most of comments agree with OP but there are still against opinions. Why we don't create a statistical table of bounty campaigns run on Bitcointalk to see the truth? Honestly I'm not good at mathematical statistics and don't know how to start with it, but some of you can do that. Guess that you will have free time to do that when you stay at home because of the virus ( i don't want to talk about it anymore). A table like that will stop the debate and maybe we will have some solutions for bounty campaigns, such as if a bounty manager had 90% of his campaigns scam, we put negative trust on him and call people don't join his campaign. not work.
Jump to: