Pages:
Author

Topic: A story about Barney, the 10K Prospector (Read 2729 times)

sr. member
Activity: 284
Merit: 250
February 27, 2015, 11:33:24 PM
#23
lose money day after day due to hyper inflation ,no thanks.
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
February 26, 2015, 10:34:47 AM
#22
I personally think that Fred is smarter than Barney  Smiley


10k with the current insane PoS % is simply unsustainable, while MMXIV at 2014% PoS seem to be perfect, from my own experience.

I was very sceptic about the viability of MMXIV when it began (at a much lower PoS rate at that time, wich was increased after) and I sold all my coins few months ago.
Then, after re-thinking about my portfolio lately, i've decided to re-buy MMXIV... and I will explain you why I did :

I see MMXIV as the perfect "mining plan", wich is way more profitable than mining.  Instead of leasing a mining plan/time for mining a random coin, holding and staking MMXIV gives you a return after day 1.  A return (call it dividends, interests) that you may sell already or not, there are advantages in doing either.  I would say that with an alt markets currently in a depression state, holding and increasing your stakes seems smarter to do, as the market will get better in the following weeks/months.

MMXIV recipe is the most perfect one, imho. iGotSpots made simply the best PoS altcoin, and i very like also the idea of gorillastake. The only thing i don't like from him is that he knows he made something great with maieuticoin and reproduced that concept with other coins, first Balls then 10k. I would really like that he stop to 3 now, because the first one is already the king. no need to flood his portfolio with more.



BALLS and 10k are very much simply tests for changes to use in MMXIV. BALLS showed the v03 protocol switch is shit, so we just forked it back. 10k showed us that 1 hour maturity is very resource dependent, but that our units can handle it. Each coin is very different, and the changes we need to test are far too drastic to stack on one chain. I cannot be more clear that making MMXIV better is the reason for all of this. MMXIV also has the best client with more features than the others do. Plus it looks very pretty  Wink

It is not a secret that MMXIV is my focus. I can't be any more adamant for people not to participate in other coins if they cannot understand and accept the risks involved with stress tests. I'm not dumping on people, that is pointless, since these chains are for testing and if I have no coins, I can't test performance
legendary
Activity: 1111
Merit: 1000
crypto-enthusiast since 2012
February 26, 2015, 09:09:03 AM
#21
I personally think that Fred is smarter than Barney  Smiley


10k with the current insane PoS % is simply unsustainable, while MMXIV at 2014% PoS seem to be perfect, from my own experience.

I was very sceptic about the viability of MMXIV when it began (at a much lower PoS rate at that time, wich was increased after) and I sold all my coins few months ago.
Then, after re-thinking about my portfolio lately, i've decided to re-buy MMXIV... and I will explain you why I did :

I see MMXIV as the perfect "mining plan", wich is way more profitable than mining.  Instead of leasing a mining plan/time for mining a random coin, holding and staking MMXIV gives you a return after day 1.  A return (call it dividends, interests) that you may sell already or not, there are advantages in doing either.  I would say that with an alt markets currently in a depression state, holding and increasing your stakes seems smarter to do, as the market will get better in the following weeks/months.

MMXIV recipe is the most perfect one, imho. iGotSpots made simply the best PoS altcoin, and i very like also the idea of gorillastake. The only thing i don't like from him is that he knows he made something great with maieuticoin and reproduced that concept with other coins, first Balls then 10k. I would really like that he stop to 3 now, because the first one is already the king. no need to flood his portfolio with more.

hero member
Activity: 561
Merit: 500
February 25, 2015, 06:52:42 PM
#20
So should we just sell off whats left in our wallets and call it a day?
Or hope for some cool shit Spots might come up with to raise the value.

I tripled my investment. I think I'll just let 'er stake and see what happens Smiley

Personally I made a small profit and am now staking to see how many coins I get before the whole thing breaks down.

I wouldn't buy any more at this point.
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
February 25, 2015, 06:06:34 PM
#19

So if it's a ponzi, then where is my giant fund





I'm #1 on the rich list of all 3 coins




Am I not allowed to BUY my own coins...? I don't understand. I spent my own money, I didn't ask for anyone else to contribute to my fund. I bought them all on the exchanges, same chance as everyone else
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
February 25, 2015, 05:59:57 PM
#18

So if it's a ponzi, then where is my giant fund





I'm #1 on the rich list of all 3 coins


legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
February 25, 2015, 05:51:38 PM
#17
Why do people think the 10,000% was the Experiment? The massive amount of inputs is what we needed to test, which is also why it starts staking after only an hour...the stake rate was just set at 10,000% so I had a round number to use. It was never even intended to be launched; people were begging me to post a version of the chain we use to test shit, so I did

I just read up on your ANN, and you said it pretty clearly there. Let me be clear, my statement wasn't a criticism on you for releasing this coin, more of a critique on those who are lampooning the sustainable profitability of this coin.

That said, I'm confident you complicitly made a profit with this coin too.

You can only profit if you sell. I'm #1 on the rich list of all 3 coins and still buying
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
February 25, 2015, 05:32:23 PM
#16
Why do people think the 10,000% was the Experiment? The massive amount of inputs is what we needed to test, which is also why it starts staking after only an hour...the stake rate was just set at 10,000% so I had a round number to use. It was never even intended to be launched; people were begging me to post a version of the chain we use to test shit, so I did

I just read up on your ANN, and you said it pretty clearly there. Let me be clear, my statement wasn't a criticism on you for releasing this coin, more of a critique on those who are lampooning the sustainable profitability of this coin.

That said, I'm confident you complicitly made a profit with this coin too.
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
February 25, 2015, 05:18:06 PM
#15
Why do people think the 10,000% was the Experiment? The massive amount of inputs is what we needed to test, which is also why it starts staking after only an hour...the stake rate was just set at 10,000% so I had a round number to use. It was never even intended to be launched; people were begging me to post a version of the chain we use to test shit, so I did
sr. member
Activity: 301
Merit: 251
February 25, 2015, 05:04:06 PM
#14
So should we just sell off whats left in our wallets and call it a day?
Or hope for some cool shit Spots might come up with to raise the value.

I tripled my investment. I think I'll just let 'er stake and see what happens Smiley
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
February 25, 2015, 04:53:15 PM
#13
Folks, there is no future for 10k. The interest rate is simply too high. You can use a compound interest calculator online to see what I mean. Here's the one I used:

http://www.thecalculatorsite.com/finance/calculators/compoundinterestcalculator.php

Let's say you buy with a single 10k coin and start staking. Using a 10,000% interest rate and daily compounding, your one coin will grow thusly:

Month 1 - 1,579
Month 2 - 2,495,966
Month 3 - 3,943,284,117
Month 4 - 6,229,847,648,442
Month 5 - 9,842,304,172,222,498
Month 6 - 15,549,489,632,025,366,528

You're reading that correctly, in 6 months a single 10k coin will have staked its way up to over 15 QUINTILLION coins.

Yep, this would be the case if the nominal interest rate is 10000% per annum compounded daily.

I haven't looked at the code for this coin; but if this is the case, anyone with a modicum of financial knowledge would know how stupidly unsustainable this is. You don't need an experiment to show that.
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
February 25, 2015, 04:41:25 PM
#12
so please...continue


Ok, since you asked.

I'll come back after some time has passed and see if anyone is still making money with this coin.

Of course, your answer will be "Plenty of people made money", and you'll be referring to the people at the top of the pyramid who made money from all the people below them.  
hero member
Activity: 561
Merit: 500
February 25, 2015, 04:29:15 PM
#11
Folks, there is no future for 10k. The interest rate is simply too high. You can use a compound interest calculator online to see what I mean. Here's the one I used:

http://www.thecalculatorsite.com/finance/calculators/compoundinterestcalculator.php

Let's say you buy with a single 10k coin and start staking. Using a 10,000% interest rate and daily compounding, your one coin will grow thusly:

Month 1 - 1,579
Month 2 - 2,495,966
Month 3 - 3,943,284,117
Month 4 - 6,229,847,648,442
Month 5 - 9,842,304,172,222,498
Month 6 - 15,549,489,632,025,366,528

You're reading that correctly, in 6 months a single 10k coin will have staked its way up to over 15 QUINTILLION coins.
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
February 25, 2015, 04:26:28 PM
#10
It's the definition of a pyramid scheme.  The only way to make money is by dumping the worthless coins to more and more people, and the final bagholders will lose all their money.

Except nobody at the top makes shit from anyone below. Nice example  Roll Eyes


I guess you're saying it's a Ponzi scheme rather than a pyramid, but it can be described either way depending on which definitions you're using.  

Because of the hyperinflation built-in to the coin, it is designed to become more and more worthless.  The people who get in at the top make the most money, since they can start dumping their stake rewards while the price is relatively high.  The people they sell to are the next level down, who can sell their stake rewards for less than the top level, but still at a profit.  The second level is selling to the third level of people, and it will be much less likely for them to make any money because everybody in crypto who wanted to buy in has already bought in by that point.  

If we could get an honest answer from the person who made this coin, I'm sure he would say that he intended the coin to function that way.


Quote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_scheme

A pyramid scheme is an unsustainable business model that involves promising participants payment or services, primarily for enrolling other people into the scheme, rather than supplying any real investment or sale of products or services to the public
 


Quote
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/04/042104.asp

The Fraud

The problem is that the scheme cannot go on forever, because there are a finite number of people who can join the scheme (even if all the people in the world were to join). People are deceived into believing that by giving money, they will make more money; however, no wealth has been created, no product has been sold, no investment has been made, and no service has been provided.

The fraud lies in the fact that it is impossible for the cycle to sustain itself, so people will lose their money somewhere down the line. Those who are most vulnerable are those toward the bottom of the pyramid, where it becomes impossible to recruit the number of people required to pay off the previous layer of recruiters. This kind of fraud is illegal in the U.S. and most countries throughout the world. It is estimated that 90% of people who get involved in a pyramid scheme will lose their money.


So if it's a ponzi, then where is my giant fund that I'm using to pay people back? Oh wait, the blockchain must be running the ponzi  Roll Eyes

Honestly, you are proving how unlike either of these they are, so please...continue
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
February 25, 2015, 04:07:30 PM
#9
It's the definition of a pyramid scheme.  The only way to make money is by dumping the worthless coins to more and more people, and the final bagholders will lose all their money.

Except nobody at the top makes shit from anyone below. Nice example  Roll Eyes


I guess you're saying it's a Ponzi scheme rather than a pyramid, but it can be described either way depending on which definitions you're using. 

Because of the hyperinflation built-in to the coin, it is designed to become more and more worthless.  The people who get in at the top make the most money, since they can start dumping their stake rewards while the price is relatively high.  The people they sell to are the next level down, who can sell their stake rewards for less than the top level, but still at a profit.  The second level is selling to the third level of people, and it will be much less likely for them to make any money because everybody in crypto who wanted to buy in has already bought in by that point. 

If we could get an honest answer from the person who made this coin, I'm sure he would say that he intended the coin to function that way.


Quote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_scheme

A pyramid scheme is an unsustainable business model that involves promising participants payment or services, primarily for enrolling other people into the scheme, rather than supplying any real investment or sale of products or services to the public
 


Quote
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/04/042104.asp

The Fraud

The problem is that the scheme cannot go on forever, because there are a finite number of people who can join the scheme (even if all the people in the world were to join). People are deceived into believing that by giving money, they will make more money; however, no wealth has been created, no product has been sold, no investment has been made, and no service has been provided.

The fraud lies in the fact that it is impossible for the cycle to sustain itself, so people will lose their money somewhere down the line. Those who are most vulnerable are those toward the bottom of the pyramid, where it becomes impossible to recruit the number of people required to pay off the previous layer of recruiters. This kind of fraud is illegal in the U.S. and most countries throughout the world. It is estimated that 90% of people who get involved in a pyramid scheme will lose their money.
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
February 25, 2015, 03:51:59 PM
#8
It's the definition of a pyramid scheme.  The only way to make money is by dumping the worthless coins to more and more people, and the final bagholders will lose all their money.

Except nobody at the top makes shit from anyone below. Nice example  Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
February 25, 2015, 02:58:35 PM
#7
It's the definition of a pyramid scheme.  The only way to make money is by dumping the worthless coins to more and more people, and the final bagholders will lose all their money.
full member
Activity: 144
Merit: 100
February 25, 2015, 09:37:38 AM
#6

If only there was a LTC (or other secondary) market...

If only.....................

Yea, I'd like to see an LTC or DRK market/exchange for 10K and/or MMXIV.  It's one of the reasons I liked trading on Cryptsy, with the different trading markets.
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
February 25, 2015, 09:28:18 AM
#5
looks like a race down to 1 satoshi, buy orders are already below 1k now.

When it is 1 satoshi, it cannot go down more in satoshi...

If only there was a LTC (or other secondary) market...

If only.....................
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 500
February 25, 2015, 04:59:41 AM
#4
looks like a race down to 1 satoshi, buy orders are already below 1k now.

When it is 1 satoshi, it cannot go down more in satoshi...
Pages:
Jump to: