I agree on other suggestions but I don't agree with KYC implementation. We all know that personal information is a very sensitive information that I cannot afford to compromise. In terms of dumping of coins, I don't believe that the bounty participants are the main reason of dumping of value because the campaign allocation is so small compared to investors and team allocation.
As I have already clarified many times, I don't want the bounty hunters to go through the KYC procedure. It's just for the ICO promoters, and to an extent the bounty campaign managers. Now if you are planning to raise $50 million or $100 million, then you need to take some responsibilities.
The problem is who will supervise these frozen deposits？I don't think this is what Bitcointalk staff should do. As a Bitcointalk staff, their job is to ensure the clean and order of the forum Instead of being custodians.
So we need some other people，But what if custodian collude with the promoter? Who is going to supervise them, this is a never-ending problem.
In my opinion, the best way is to set up a credible supervisory body, preferably with a government background.
